about the Anonymous video on Islam from the UK

Some things really are too good to be true. A video we posted here yesterday claiming to be from AnonymousUK and on an anon YT channel, which by the way is both accurate and excellent and a testament to the British will to fight totalitarianism and preserve classical liberalism, turns out to be a concern for more orthodox ‘Anonymous’ activists.

IMG_24072013_152546

As it turns out, ‘Anonymous is pretty much like every other group claiming to be open and anyone can be a member and they represent everybody etc. unless of course, you deviate 3 degrees from whatever it is they believe and then they will ‘arrange a counter-strike’ against you.

I wish they would show a little more honesty and actually have a real name and a charter so others might know what they believe and either stand with them or against them with integrity. As it is if you join them but aren’t perfectly inline with them then you are in some real trouble I bet. And doesn’t that make them pretty much exactly like who they attack?

The video again:

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

9 Replies to “about the Anonymous video on Islam from the UK”

  1. Hello there…..its me again……Don Laird…..

    Below are a few comments I cobbled together…because I am a lazy bastard……mea culpa, mea culpa….

    We have seen far, far too much of this sort of criminality and “activism” from these children, little more than self appointed judge, jury and executioner for matters that bruise their tender and delicate political sensibilities.

    From the sociopathic little Australian albino Julian Assange to a festering little collection of pimply faced, pathetic social failures that sit behind computer monitor’s terrorizing private citizens and government for their own sick sense of satisfaction, their warped amusement and their downright vile mechanism to fill the powerless little self inflicted voids in their lives.

    The reality is that this little band of thugs, Anonymous, is doing more to prompt the darkening of the internet than any government or corporation, and that’s a fact. Punks like these simply are those who will provide all the ammunition the real foes need to say “Look at what Anonymous did!!! We must keep the information safe”……We must control the internet!!!!……what a farce.

    And when the Internet light does go out around the world and the dictators once again have free reign to catalogue the next batch of the denounced, to dig the mass graves and begin mass slaughter anew…..where will these vulgar little failures be?……sitting behind computer screens flaming and trolling each other and masturbating with their blood drenched political hands to their only available social outlet…cyber porn.

    How laughably typical.

    If these little worms had one shred of courage they could have easily taken on the mantle of political prisoners, like Alexsander Solzhenitsyn, and fought from the inside, paying the price for their little games. Or they could have followed the well worn paths of courage of conviction and selfless devotion, paths trod by the likes of Nelson Mandela of South Africa, of Mother Theresa of Calcutta, of Tenzin Gyatso of Tibet or Aung San Suu Kyi of Burma…….but that’s too much like work for these little vermin. That involves courage of conviction, that involves horrific beatings, that involves months and years of solitary confinement where your sanity slowly withers away leaving you as nothing more than a babbling, incoherent life-support system for a mouthful of rotting teeth……..and that……is not the currency the little worms at Anonymous like to deal in……something a little less final, a little less rigorous is their stock in trade.

    The reality is that Anonymous is simply playing politics, dirty little games of partisan politics.

    The actions of Anonymous has the excrement of Marxist fascism smeared all over this little “avenging” and all their other “actions”

    They wrap themselves in the robes of altruism and an air of self righteousness claiming to be the “protectors” of democracy, fighting the “good” fight against “the man” and the “evil corporations” what a gut wrenching farce, this reeks of the Occupy circus.

    The reality is that most of Anonymous have a deep seated seething hatred for Western culture, pure and simple.

    The reality is the internet is the most powerful weapon/tool ever placed in the hands of the citizen/worker/employer/entrepreneur/activist. With one click of a mouse injustice can be exposed and sent to millions around the world, so too acts of mass murder and oppression.

    But do these little Anonymous worms really and truly know what they are playing with? and who appointed them judge jury and executioner.

    Think about it for a moment.

    Words like “hack” and “revenge” and “avenge” may titillate and amuse pathetic little social failures sitting behind computer screens gorging themselves on Red Bull and marathon masturbation sessions but to the hundreds of millions of average people that read of this horseshit in the media it makes them very angry and very uncomfortable. With just one little stunt like this Anonymous just wiped out hundreds of thousands of votes for internet independence as now government can point to incidents like these and call it “cyber-terrorism”…..these stupid fucking bastards just shot us all in the foot.

    We badly need a free internet, an unbiased, open internet and one without the influence and control, in any form of either government or corporations. Stupidity like this just scares the shit out of the general population and gives totalitarian tyrants carte blanche.

    Whether its music, movies, books, scripts, artwork, or anything to which a copyright or claim of intellectual property is attached……it belongs to its creator.

    When it comes to the sneering arrogant worms like Julian Assange or the Anonymous crew, I recommend you watch a small ramble by Douglas Murray…….it sums up my sentiments quite nicely.

    This is a debate that involved Douglas Murray, Julian Assange and is hosted by the New Statesman / Frontline Club.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emPIz7Sv1LE

    For all the supporters of Anonymous…….listen very carefully to the words of Douglas Murray……and then think very carefully before you so enthusiastically act as cheerleader for a sorry collection of juvenile delinquent vandals who wrap their personal axe-grinding in the robes of altruism and freedom fighting.

    Regards, Don Laird
    Dogtown Bastard
    Alberta. Canada

  2. Message to the wannabe lynch-mob hiding behind the coward’s mask of ‘anonymous’:

    Unlike you, the EDL don’t seem to hide. They actually send their message quite openly.

    As to the video: the poster’s comments clearly identify him as one (the only one?) ethical member of the club. Here is what he says:

    “For those of you wondering why I used? the word “I” instead of “We”, it is simply because I know other Anons will not feel the same way about this, and therefore I did not use the word “We” as it would have given a false representation of the opinions of other Anons. I would also like to say I respect the opinions of others and if you have something to say please feel free to comment it. I do also understand that not all Muslims are like this and that some just want to live a normal life.”

  3. To quote you: “I wish they would show a little more honesty and actually have a real name and a charter so others might know what they believe and either stand with them or against them with integrity. As it is if you join them but aren’t perfectly inline with them then you are in some real trouble I bet. And doesn’t that make them pretty much exactly like who they attack?”

    Think about it. Anonymous having a charter, principles, a mission statement, integrity, even ? That’s ludicrous and naive. Anyone can be an Anon, since it’s not a close-knit organization. Just go to the store and buy a mask, don it while videoing yourself to say what you want and rail against any ‘system’ you can think of that takes your personal fancy to criticize, and you’re a member of anonymous by default ! It’s as simple as that ! These people are basically post-puberty mid twenties to mid thirties with a juvenile attitude, like sixteen-year olds rebelling against their parents. The less attention they grab from real intellectuals and the media the better. It’s just a bunch of sad bastards with too much time on their hands and nothing better to do. Attention seekers, plain and simple.

  4. LUCH:

    “Anyone can be an Anon, since it’s not a close-knit organization. Just go to the store and buy a mask, don it while videoing yourself to say what you want and rail against any ‘system’ you can think of that takes your personal fancy to criticize, and you’re a member of anonymous by default ! It’s as simple as that !”

    My point is that it isn’t at all like that. What you say above is the claim but the actual reality is, they do have a very strict code of what is an acceptable position for anonymous and what is not and if you claim to represent anonymous and make a video which is outside those rather ‘progressive’ and anti-nationalist views then they will punish you. My point is that they are dishonest by their own standards. Not yours or mine. The evidence is what I posted. That they plan to do some sort of action against the maker of the AnonymousUK video because its views are not inline with the vigilantes who are the actual agenda setters and hackers behind the anonymous brand.

  5. I seriously disagree. I know for a fact that Anonymus Belgium for instance had threatened to screw around with the Sharia4Belgium website and the organization as a whole, if possible. Which they announced as an collective Anonymous action. I did not hear of any “counter initiative” from Anonymous to nip this in the bud or bring their individual members to heel, which supports my view. It was reported in the MSM at the time. And nothing came of it.

    Now, I never thought for one instance that this was anything other than a juvenile attempt of these wankers to gain attention for their stupid claims to be able to grind institutions or organizations collectively to a halt. Which is basically the wet dream of individual hobbyist hacking students still stuck in their teens. Neither did I for one moment believe that these people would be seriously concerned about Islamization in the 21st century or Salafism in particular, being the intellectual nitwits they are. That would, by the imaginary standards, be too ‘rightwing’ for Anonymous, if there were such anarchist standards in the first place. But still they made the claim they were going to hinder this group for the benefit of society as a whole ??? Absolutely none of it rang true in my mind. Simple fact: there are no standards, neither to uphold, nor to break. Idiots playing around, and trying to make us believe they are cogwheels in a well-organized machinery, that’s all there is to it.

    What would you expect from a bunch of loonies developing this so-called universal doctrine from something as juvenile as 4chan ? There’s not as much coherence or cohesiveness in Anonymous present as some people claim there is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*