KILLER LORD AHMED TARD OF LARD BLAMES DA JOOOOS FOR HIS JAIL SENTENCE

Repugnant a-hole.

This is the piece of crap who ran over Martyn Gombar, 28, a Slovak living in Leigh, Lancashire, with his car while texting on his cell phone, who ended up receiving only a 12 week sentence, of which he served only 16 days. And he’s still complaining. The man simply has no remorse whatsoever for the poor Slovak he murdered. Strip the jerk of his title, citizenship and send him packing.

NOTE: It can be safely assumed that Finland’s Pertti Salolainen, prone to believing anti-Semitic conspiracies, would feel sympathy for the Lord Tard of Lard.

pertti salolainen anti-semitic smear on US Jews 30.11.2012

Lord Ahmed in the slammer

UK MP blames jail sentence on Jewish ‘conspiracy’

By JONNY PAUL, JERUSALEM POST CORRESPONDENT
03/14/2013 04:03

Lord Ahmed says prison sentence for texting while driving due to pressure on court by Jews who “own newspapers, television.”

Britain's Lord Nazir Ahmed

Britain’s Lord Nazir Ahmed Photo: Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah / Reuters

LONDON – A British politician who was jailed after sending a text message while driving on a motorway, which killed another motorist, has blamed his fate on a Jewish conspiracy.

Lord Nazir Ahmed, 55, who became one of the first Muslim peers in the UK after former Prime Minister Tony Blair appointed him in 1998, has said that his prison sentence was a result of pressure applied on the court by Jews “who own newspapers and television channels,” the Times said on Thursday.

He also claimed that the judge in the 2008 case was appointed to his position after he helped a “Jewish colleague” of Blair during an important case. According to Ahmed, Justice Wilkie was hand-picked to carry out the sentencing because no other judge was willing to handle his case.

He also alleged that Jewish-owned media organizations pressured the courts to charge him with a more serious offense.

Ahmed maintained that the plot to stemmed from Jewish disapproval of his support for the Palestinians in Gaza. The Times said he repeated his comments during a television interview in Pakistan, which was said to have been broadcast last April.

“My case became more critical because I went to Gaza to support Palestinians. My Jewish friends who own newspapers and TV channels opposed this,” he allegedly said in the interview.

More here.

8 Replies to “KILLER LORD AHMED TARD OF LARD BLAMES DA JOOOOS FOR HIS JAIL SENTENCE”

  1. He’s been suspended from the Labour Party over his remarks, the second time he’s been suspended in less than a year. In April last year he was suspended over the £10 million bounty he offered for the capture of Obama and Bush.
    The Labour Party is a revolving door for him.
    He was appointed to the House of Lords by Tony Blair, and has called for Tony Blair to be indicted as a war criminal.

  2. But I fear he may be right …
    had atheists been running things, we would have said – you destroyed the only life that man will ever have, no grapes, no harps, no fig trees.
    Hard labour until you are ready to beg the forgiveness of the family and give them everything you own.

  3. @Santor
    It would require an Act of Parliament permanently to exclude a member of the House of Lords.
    http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN05148

    They haven’t expelled those convicted of serious offences: for example Conrad Black, Jeffrey Archer and Mike Watson.
    The House of Lords has in the past suspended members for a period or for the remainder of a parliament but cannot stop a life peer from receiving a call to each new parliament. They’d have to suspend him anew each time.
    Nazir Ahmed can’t be pressured to quit the House of Lords, as while hereditary peers can surrender their title, life peers cannot.
    New rules for discipline were under debate in a parliamentary bill but were dropped when the last election was called.

    Removing the actual title is a different issue.
    http://www.parliament.uk/about/faqs/house-of-lords-faqs/lords-members/
    A peerage is created by Letters Patent and it can only be removed by an Act of Parliament.

    The last time a peerage was removed was in 1917 under the Titles Deprivation Act, which provided for peers who fought against the Crown in the First World War – and thus were guilty of treason – to be deprived of their titles.

    One practical measure to remove a title has been taken in the past but has fallen into disuse.
    It involves an axe.

  4. Lord Fish and Chips, an affirmative action Lord to show the ‘Slums what a successful splash they have made in Britanistan. Of course he is an embarrassing buffoon, he is a Muslim.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*