Sharia courts ‘as consensual as rape’, House of Lords told

H/T EDL Buck


 MUSLIM women in Britain are being forced to “live in fear” because of the spread of unofficial and unregulated sharia courts enforcing Islamic rules, the House of Lords was told.

Sharia courts ‘as consensual as rape’, House of Lords told

One study estimated that there are around 85 Sharia bodies operating in Britain Photo: Paul Grover

By , Religious Affairs Editor

7:00AM BST 20 Oct 2012

Rulings by informal religious “councils” and tribunals are sometimes no more “consensual” than rape, peers were told.

The warnings came in the first ever full Parliamentary debate on the subject in the UK.

Baroness Cox, the independent peer and Third World campaigner, last year tabled a private member’s bill in the Lords setting out plans to rein in a network of unofficial self-styled “courts” which apply Islamic principles.

One study estimated that there are around 85 Sharia bodies operating in Britain, although there is no official estimate.

They include legally recognised arbitration tribunals, set up primarily to resolve financial disputes using Islamic legal principles but which have taken on a wider range of cases.

Click to continue:

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

4 Replies to “Sharia courts ‘as consensual as rape’, House of Lords told”

  1. It’s about time somebody got a grip of the situation. Our government/s have given far to much to these cretins including the setting up of Shiria courts for muslims. It’s obvious that the people responsible for allowing the use of Shiria in this country have not a clue as to what Shiria is all about.

  2. Further to our discussion

    DP111 wrote: What is needed is a strategy that makes Muslims leave of their own accord. No expense of repatriation or deportation. No squeals of discrimination. No appeals to Human rights. No media sympathy. This way we maintain our unblemished record of humanism and tolerance.

    Fred says: October 20, 2012 at 11:54 am


    The only way that could be done is to make it financially and legally not lucrative for them to remain here. Which in turn and again would confront us with a criminality that would render all normal workings of society impossible. And where you would have to use force. It’s a vicious circle really. Oh wait. I think I found a solution. We could create a muslim kalifate somewhere in africa for them, with the promise that if they agree to join there, we will indefinitely subsidize everything, from cradle to grave. Other than that, sorry. Some riddles just don’t have a solution. And all of a sudden, H.G. Wells’s time machine springs to mind. The Eloi and the Morlocks.

    You have struck on one very important point.

    1. Caliphate – we are doing this for them under the guise of taking the “light of freedom and democracy”, or WMDs, or whatever excuse is convenient

    The establishment of a caliphate is quite suitable for us.

    2. The position of Muslim women in the West. If we play this right, Muslims will become increasingly worried that they will lose their women to the Infidel culture. Any family that limits the freedom of Muslim boys or girls, to be imprisoned or fined heavily. But repeat, no mention of deportation.

    This to be done with nothing but good intentions for the welfare of Muslim girls and women.

  3. Freedom is more important than money, whether in the form of welfare or free money.Moslems and other asians tend to go to Western countries to make more money and NOT because they they want more freedom. Their moslems women also tend to love money more than freedom. Therefore, the West should not waste time or money on moslems whims and fancies.

  4. Therefore, if those moslems lose their freedom in the West, don’t blame the West. Blame themselves or their islamic community or their sharia or their islamic greed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *