Captains Journal:
5 days, 23 hours ago
As precursors to my analysis, take note of the following inconsistencies and contradictions. First, Dr. Steve Metz, Professor at the U.S. Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, in response to Sharia is coming, left this comment: “Should we worry about the creeping influence of the Boy Scout laws? More people follow that in the United States than sharia.” Note well. Steve is comparing Boy Scout law with Sharia law. This Boy Scout law – compared to this sharia law.
On the other hand, because of political correctness, in the Spring of this year, US Army Lieutenant Colonel Matthew Dooley was condemned by the Joints Chiefs of Staff (JCS) and relieved of teaching duties at Joint Forces Staff College for teaching a course judged to be offensive to Islam. The course he taught, Perspectives on Islam and Islamic Radicalism, was an elective course that Lt. Col. Dooley’s superiors judged as presenting Islam in a negative way. His superiors were persuaded to come to this conclusion after receiving an October 2011 letter in which 57 Muslim organizations claimed to be offended by the course. The fact that Lt. Col. Dooley is a highly decorated combat veteran with nearly 20 years of service under his belt apparently held little or no sway with the JCS. As a matter of fact, JCS Chairman General Martin Dempsey “personally attacked” Lt. Col. Dooley on C-Span on May 10, 2012, during a Pentagon News Conference.
Anarchists see American law just as bad, if not even far worse, than Sharia. Locking people up into concrete boxes, which is insanely inhuman, has become almost a norm and institutionalized perpetually. Many people refer to this as the ‘other capital punishment’… death via slow imprisonment which is far more painful than anything sudden.
US laws are no less corrupt than Sharia laws, when it comes to anyone who opposes them. In the US you will be hanged or shot for treason or sedition, or raising a hand against the corrupt as hell state..
Lets look at how hypocritical US law is… take for instance, the assassination of Osama Bin Laden in his home. Now who knows if Bin Laden actually had anything to do with 9/11, or was just some kook wanting the notoriety of claiming he was. The world is full of nutcases, who prefer any fame, to no fame at all.
Now I’m the first one to admit, flying two planes into two cities in two dastardly surprise attacks that kill thousands of innocent men, women, and children in big fireballs… is a horrible crime… and… wait… sorry… wandering off topic, Hiroshima and Nagasaki are for the history books. That’s right, the US did it first. 300,000, instead of 6,000 died.
Back to Osama Bin Laden…
Here the US government sends an assassination squad into a foreign country, into a person home, a political figure, at night, and assassinates them in cold blood. In their home. No arrest, no trial, no jury, no due process, no habeas corpus nothing. An outright assassination.
Not only is murder against their own laws, this is against all international law, and doubly so because he was a politcal figure inside another country… which is tantamount to an act of war.
Sharia is bullshit… and so is Islam… but so is Christianity (the same shit… more fairy tale gods and lauding its bogus morality upon everyone else)…. but so is the rotten state that the United States, and the sell out tool thugs (the military, CIA, and police forces) that do the dirty mercenary work for the Republican and Democratic party.
The US government and its laws are totally hypocritical, once you put them under a looking glass, you see them for what they truly are… a codified protection racket of thugs… we can kill people at will, but you can not. We can extort steal money in taxes and eminent domain, but you can not. We can have slaves in prison, but slavery is illegal for you. Even gangsters have a Constitution…
Choppergirl wrote: The US government and its laws are totally hypocritical, once you put them under a looking glass, you see them for what they truly are… a codified protection racket of thugs… we can kill people at will, but you can not. We can extort steal money in taxes and eminent domain, but you can not. We can have slaves in prison, but slavery is illegal for you. Even gangsters have a Constitution…
True in many respects – like Western governments can “print” money using the fiction of Quantitative Easing, but we cannot. The trouble is what do you propose that is better.
Choppergirl wrote: The US government and its laws are totally hypocritical, once you put them under a looking glass, you see them for what they truly are… a codified protection racket of thugs… we can kill people at will, but you can not. We can extort steal money in taxes and eminent domain, but you can not. We can have slaves in prison, but slavery is illegal for you. Even gangsters have a Constitution…
True in many respects – like Western governments can “print” money using the fiction of Quantitative Easing, but we cannot. The trouble is what do you propose that is better. The Swiss form of government puts all the power in the hands of the people. It is suitable for a country with a small population, and a coherent and homogenous population. It wont do for a nation the size of the USA with a large and varied population mix.
Choppergirl is simply trying moral equivalence, she wants to destroy the US by saying that we are as bad as the ones we fight, yet under the system she wants to impose might would make right (utter anarchy) or the elite would rule and everyone else would shut up and obey (Marxism). She seems to think we don’t know enough history to know how flawed our governments are, or how evil her ideas are, they always lead to tyranny, they have been tried many times in history and have always failed. The left are so arrogant that they think they can make their evil system work when no one else has been able to, they ignore the flaw in their plan, what happens when they die?