Proof: Huma has Ties to Muslim Brotherhood – Countless Documents Surface

This is the first part of this PDF file:

INTRODUCTION
Media figures and politicians alike have demanded “proof” regarding Congresswoman Michele Bachmann’s allegations that Huma Abedin has connections and family ties with the Muslim Brotherhood. It is understandable that many want to get to the bottom of this story regarding Huma herself. Many even demanded that Bachmann offer a public apology to Huma Abedin. Others watch the media and listen to politicians that provide short, nondescript arguments. An apology by Bachmann in this case is unnecessary since we have established what is probably the most extensive research done to date on the matter; the readers can decide for themselves by examining the overwhelming evidence to see that in reality that it is Bachmann who is owed an apology and has a valid point to demand the vetting of Huma Abedin, the aid to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Bachmann’s focus was hardly on Huma Abedin, but the infiltration of extremist Muslims into government. An issue that was completely ignored is the level of importance that should be given to vetting government employees.

We are sure that many will point to ‘specs’ of errors in our findings in an attempt to lead many to ignore the ‘mountain’ of evidence we present. The fact is that politicians are responsible for causing the controversy to escalate. John McCain – along with other politicians – denounced Bachmann and demanded “proof” regarding such ties. Said McCain:

“The letter alleges that three members of Huma’s family are ‘connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations…these sinister accusations rest solely on a few unspecified and unsubstantiated associations of members of Huma’s family”.

Rep. Keith Ellison told Anderson Cooper on CNN on July 17th that:

“U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann’s allegations of a Muslim Brotherhood “deep penetration” of the federal government is “untrue” and a “phantom.”

We will prove beyond doubt that McCain, Ellison and the others are wrong. The evidence will show that Bachmann’s claim is not based on a “phantom,” “sinister accusation,” or “unspecified and unsubstantiated associations of members of Huma’s family.”

MEDIA / POLITICIANS VS. EVIDENCE
Honest researchers at times need to differentiate between what the ‘media’ and ‘politicians’ say, versus ‘verifiable proof’, which we will present in specific detail, by providing the facts, mostly from Arabic sources, both secular and Islamic, which the media and politicians did not research due to linguistic limitations. This is no excuse since they could have easily commissioned linguists to examine the Arabic sources or acquired what is considered common knowledge from Middle Eastern archives. CNN for example, critiqued Bachmann by flashing a chart showing what they termed “six degrees of separation” between Huma and the Brotherhood. Their coverage was devoid of any sources or detailed information; Keith Ellison’s view was expressed without any being challenged by supposed experts on the subject.

CNN’s Anderson Cooper made a demonstrably false statement:

page1image24920
page1image25192
page1image25464
page1image25736
page1image26008
page1image26280

“As per Abedin’s mother and brother, Bachmann never gives any evidence of their alleged links to the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Bachmann absolutely did. We will begin with Huma’s brother, Hassan Abedin, followed by her mother Saleha Abedin, then Huma herself to conclude that: 1) Either no vetting process has been done on Huma, or 2) perhaps she obtained a waiver for her security clearance. So let’s start.

Please click here to download the entire document:

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

10 Replies to “Proof: Huma has Ties to Muslim Brotherhood – Countless Documents Surface”

  1. Does she have direct involvement with the Muslim brotherhood or evil affiliations?
    I see one thing in that list but I don’t know how they are affiliated or if she is still part of it?

    My dad is an idiot but that doesn’t mean I am.
    I am sorry guys but what other peoples actions are in your life doesn’t mean you are.

  2. OxAO Your logic is flawless. And there is very solid information on all the links involved. I haven’t even had time to go over it all yet, but start here:

    http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.ca/2012/07/the-gop-establishment-and-muslim.html

    Over the next 24 hours between what should appear at this site (It will take me longer than usual to sort through it all because there is law fare involved in publishing some of the material) and at Gates of Vienna, you should find satisfactory information. I would welcome your thoughts on it.

  3. To me the most telling evidence is the lack of action, verbal or physical by her family, they appear to be the type of people who would gleefully engage in honor killing yet they haven’t even voiced dis-satisfaction at her choice of a husband or her dress. This is circumstantial evidence but still evidence.

  4. The fact that Huma is a moslem or comes from a moslem background itself is a problem and most probably will cause problems to the American society who wish to defend Western freedom.

  5. It already is causing a problem for us, her influence on Hillary and through her the rest of the administration is one of the problems with the current foreign policy.

  6. It is not surprising that people like Huma are making use of the gullibility of the West to further herself in an infidel world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*