Bat-wielding Muslim kills man in French mosque

Funny, you hardly ever see a headline like that about a church or a synegogue or like, a Hindu temple or anything. OK maybe a knife or sword fight at a Sikh one, yeah that happens.

AP.ORG:

By JAMEY KEATEN
Associated Press

PARIS (AP) — A Muslim worshipper said to have psychological troubles entered a mosque in northern France and repeatedly beat two elderly men with a bat Friday, killing one and badly injuring the other, a Muslim leader and a police official said.

The assailant identified only as “Seddik” – his first name – carried out the attack in the tiny Ennour mosque in the city of Arras shortly after afternoon prayers, said Abdelkader Aoussedj, of Paris’ main mosque.

A local police official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of office policy, told The Associated Press that the suspect lived in Arras, was in his 30s, and had a police record for violence.

Click to Continue:

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

5 Replies to “Bat-wielding Muslim kills man in French mosque”

  1. What the heck was the point of putting the link about the Sikh temple here?

    You know, there’s a Hindu temple where they feed rats. Yes rats. Not only that, check up ‘sacred prositution’ on wikipedia.

    Peadophillia happens in churches.

    This ridiculous-biased article gives of a reference to a singular incident and let’s the other faiths of the hook, for long standing controversies.

  2. PARIS (AP) — A Muslim worshipper said to have psychological troubles entered a mosque in northern France and repeatedly beat two elderly men with a bat Friday, killing one and badly injuring the other, a Muslim leader and a police official said.

    The MSM always manages to find “psychological” reasons when the perpetrator is a Muslim.

  3. Good point robocopter.

    That being said, it’s notable that minorities batten down the hatches when it’s Friday prayers.

    Would that the secular West take an interest in learning about religions, all of them, to learn the many differences in order to make informed opinions. So many of the secular lump all of them together as the worst evil of humanity.

    By definition, being secular implies that there has been very little learning of religions and their writings in the first place. However, the vicious judgments they make are with an air of righteousness, as if these judges had actually taken the time to learn about them. Ignorant opinions, while not valid, are nonetheless dangerous.

    I believe that the thought process goes something like “I know that there is no value in religion, only negatives, therefore my judgment is valid, and there is no point in boring myself to death by actually studying them. I therefore would never suffer through actually reading for example, the Bible.”

    And so the circle of ignorant righteousness forms an endless loop.

  4. PD111 I suspect there is an actual rule for the media stating that, as this diagnosis is nearly always given, and often way before the person could possibly have been seen by a psychiatrist. The Muslim who attacked several others at a cafe in Holland not so long ago was a great example. He was said to have psychiatric issues without benefit of ever having seen a shrink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*