This from the Brussels Journal with a H/T to AA to bringing it to my attention.
A Multicultural Conference Hijacked By Islamists
During the last weekend of October, a conference in Antwerp got a lot of resonance in the Arab world. The same conference was virtually ignored in Belgium, even within the local Muslim community. “The place of Islam in the new Europe” was the title of the conference which was widely reported on Al Jazeera (see video below this article) and the Moroccan newspaper Le Matin. In Belgium, only Gazet van Antwerpen published a short article on the local pages in three of its six regional editions. Make no mistake: this was a conference to promote multiculturalism en mutual understanding between the Islamic world and Europe. The conference was organized by the Institute for Moroccan and Mediterranean Studies of the University of Antwerp, abbreviated as “IMaMs“.

CHAOTIC
The conference was announced as a big event, but its course was chaotic. Jacques Attali was announced as the keynote speaker, but he didn’t come. The program and the panelists were very different from what was announced in the invitation, and a complete schedule was distributed on paper only halfway through the conference. What should have been a conference on an academic level, turned out to be an event with very few high-level scholars and with very few references to scientific studies, statistics or serious references.
REFERENCE TO NAZI SCIENTIST
Already at the opening session, the first blunder was heard, even though most of the audience never noticed it. Speaker Muhammad Bensalah highlighted the contribution of Islam to European civilization, and suggested that few Western scholars fully recognized the Islamic contribution without covering it up. He named three: the American John Esposito, the German Sigrid Hunke and the Belgian George Sarton. Now, Sigrid Hunke was an employee of the scientific department of the SS under the Nazi regime, where she was researching racial psychology. In that position she came in contact with the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem who openly advocated the extermination of the Jews. In her book “Allahs Sonne über dem Abendland” (“Allah’s sun over the Occident”) she asserted that the roots of European civilization were not Christian, but are a mix of Islamic, pagan-Celtic and Germanic elements. She illustrates this argument with now discredited theories like the sea map of Piri Reis allegedly used by Columbus, and the fact that in German and Dutch one does not say “twenty three” but “three twenty” (Dreiundzwanzig, drieëntwintig), because in Arabic, one reads from right to left.

John Esposito is a no good weasel.
Daniel Pipes has written about him – but not in those same terms.
http://www.danielpipes.org
I have also heard him on radio. He is a traitor sell out for $$ from House of Sod.
Our friend John Esposito is indeed a no good weasel. Him and his creator, Edward Said, are the reason all our university educated “Middle East Experts” are so totally out to lunch. He is the central conduit of misinformation. He is indeed evil.
Anyone who is talking about multiculturalism and saying it can and does work if lying, when you are looking at such meetings look and see if there is anyone talking about how multiculturalism is a failure? If there isn’t then it is a propaganda show for the Moslems.
It would seem that 50 years of multi culti foolishness and wide open immigration from nations that do not have a comon belief system are coming home to roost. How far behind are we? Not as far as we think we are, I’d wager.
Dr. Esposito has submitted. With all his heart, soul and mind. There’s nothing left of him to think for himself.
comments above are acceptable since edward said goes enough beside the story, esposito made his contribution as like as sigrid hunke and debate still open to reduce violence and terror’s scourge.
much people don’t like sigrid hunke because it seems she; belongs to nazi’s party but his famous book was a considerable acadimical work whether, we accept its content or not.as like as raymod aron ; pierre bourdieu…. or charles darwin….
from 1936 to 1945 all people in germay were nazi , they have no choice . nazism is a small part of the history ….as like as marxism / leninism….