Girl beats old Sikh in UK. Friends stand by and do nothing. I would do the same.

There is a great deal being made of this clip and the girl who seemed to have attacked the elderly Sikh man is now under arrest. But pay close attention to the last thing she says in the video and remember, whoever decided to start filming this must have seen something that made him decide it was worth doing. My guess is when the old man in fact groped her breasts. Her reaction was exactly what it should have been as was the reaction of her friends. To make sure he didn’t hit her back.

And they say chivalry is dead. Of course, they will try and make this about racism. But had a white guy grabbed her tits and she fought back like that she would be being hailed as a hero by the same exact media. Here is the story as spun by the Daily Mail.

If he did what she accuses him of doing to her, then the Daily Mail headline is exactly what he deserved. If more women did that, more men would be respectful of other women’s bodies.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

35 Replies to “Girl beats old Sikh in UK. Friends stand by and do nothing. I would do the same.”

  1. Years ago I and my wife travelled in India. She was always being groped, even in the “holy” site of the Golden Temple. She finally began carrying an attaché case, and wacking them between the legs whenever possible when this happened….kind of like this gal.

  2. God has created diverse human beings to live in this tiny global village of one family. Creation by its very nature is diverse with different species, different communities, different cultures and languages. These differences represent the beauty and wonder but diversity is sometimes not fully appreciated, resulting in all sorts of clashes. The British society and Establishment must learn to respect and accommodate others, as if in a family.

    A Muslim is a citizen of this tiny global village. He/she does not want to become notoriously monolingual Brit. He/she is supposed to be well versed in standard English, Arabic, Urdu and other community languages, to be part of the British society, as well as proud of his/her cultural roots and enjoy the beauty of his/her literature and poetry.

    During colonial days, British did not follow local customs or culture. They didn’t exactly “go native”. They even forced the native Americans and native Australian to adopt all the evils of their culture and customs. They are still the underdogs of American and Australian societies. At least Australian Prime Minister apologised to the natives for their evil deeds. Brits living in Spain and France don’t even bother learning the language of the new adopted country.Frankly suggesting that people don’t want to become “British” they should move elsewhere is extremely irritating. Immigrants are in UK because they are needed, it was never an act of charity. Without migration, British economy and society will bleed to death. British culture and customs will undoubtedly change as it has for millennium due to immigration. I am not quite sure why Brits would be worried about that.
    IA

  3. I don’t know. I can’t imagine that a Sikh would have intentionally done what she claimed. It is out of character completely for a Sikh. A muslim in a group would have definitely done it and more perhaps. Check out the propaganda above from our old mate Iftitkhar. Always good for a laugh:) Sorry Bro, the final Crusade is coming…. Good luck being on the opposite side to ANZACS…:)

  4. You note, Iftikhar Ahmad did not address the subject in hand, that is of a young woman attacking and old man after claiming he touched her breasts.

    So Iftikhar was using a standard circular, a weapon of propaganda as from the Far Right or Far Left.

    This is the template.

    1. Establish a Big Lie from the get-go.

    National Socialism: God has created diverse human beings to live in this tiny global village of one family.

    International Socialism: “Mankind is a body of diverse human beings to live in this tiny global village of one family.”

    The truth: mankind have evolved from primates into diverse human beings and is continuing to evolve. The only laws required are ‘thou shall not’ to determine who are the outlaws that harm the others.

    Socialists determine ‘thou shalt’ because they are control-freak paranoid sociopathic behaviorists.

    2. Use false science.

    Creation by its very nature is diverse with different species, different communities, different cultures and languages.

    Creation is not Diverse. Animals compete and the eventual winner fills that niche. It’s called the food chain. A fox and a chicken are not diverse.

    These differences represent the beauty and wonder but diversity is sometimes not fully appreciated, resulting in all sorts of clashes.

    This ‘wonder’ is based on ignorance.

    3. Use false instruction.

    The British society and Establishment must learn to respect and accommodate others, as if in a family.

    Note the same way some use the word “love” as here the word “family” is employed as a universal, homogenous equal term.

    They are nothing of the sort with lesser and greater meanings. If a member of your family starts touching people’s todgers or wants to destroy your home for being kuffar, that person is excluded for the safety of the children. There is no ‘universal family’ that any criminal and deviants belong to. They exclude themselves from civilized society. However, in Socialism there are no prisons to separate the human family from the United Fraternity of Socialist Deviants, because in these societies it is one big open prison with surveillance cameras and Community Enforcement Officers to police the non-deviant with a culture of fear not to offend.

    Socialist and Muslims are not civilized. Listen to how they speak in private to each other.

    When you enter a person’s home, you respect their values and customs. British Society is made to feel it owes the world, to dhimmi itself for cheap industrial wares from Communist China and cheap oil from Islamic caliphates. Because the British Public schoolboy is bisexual and takes it both ways, this is how he imprints his identity on the rest of the country. Britain is no more than a diplomatic outpost where the natives must be divided and ruled.

    4. Use false inferences.

    A Muslim is a citizen of this tiny global village. He/she does not want to become notoriously monolingual Brit. He/she is supposed to be well versed in standard English, Arabic, Urdu and other community languages, to be part of the British society, as well as proud of his/her cultural roots and enjoy the beauty of his/her literature and poetry.

    There are many Muslims who had once assimilated into British life and dropped their religion to a mere token of a barbaric past. The new influx of hundreds of thousands have no respect for the country.

    They once came because they wanted to have the same opportunities the British people once enjoyed. In the last 10 years a deliberate European Scorched Earth Policy of Diversity using the welfare and housing stock paid for by British people to bring about a New Order of a European Zone. Criminals who breed on Welfare, those women who steal children from their one night stands and are proud of their crudeness, are no longer willing to learn to be independent but fill their heads with “Allah is Great” and “Man-Boy Love” and then vote for them.

    5. Lie about the country’s past

    During colonial days, British did not follow local customs or culture. They didn’t exactly “go native”. They even forced the native Americans and native Australian to adopt all the evils of their culture and customs. They are still the underdogs of American and Australian societies. At least Australian Prime Minister apologized to the natives for their evil deeds.

    The British Common Wealth is a testament to the success of the British Empire. Nigerians look at South Africa and wished the British had not left so soon. Countries could not wish the Muslims left soon enough.

    6. Use Marxist cultural relativism

    Brits living in Spain and France don’t even bother learning the language of the new adopted country.

    We know these Brits are slobs. But then you use it to argue why Muslims equally don’t assimilate. It is like the feminist who judges her equality by living like the most deviant male, or the sexual-pervert gang-banging his way to family values.

    7. Express faux outrage

    Frankly suggesting that people don’t want to become “British” they should move elsewhere is extremely irritating.

    8. Lie again.

    Immigrants are in UK because they are needed, it was never an act of charity.Without migration, British economy and society will bleed to death.

    Industries exported to China, large unemployment and the culture of welfare-dependency. Nope, I can’t think any other reason for importing the most unintelligent from around the world other than it was political, like when Russia displaced its indigenous populations across the whole country to create a massive Russian federation of soviet states.
    A dumbed-down Public Service and Media. Bankrupt. The Detroit of Europe.

    9. Deceive
    British culture and customs will undoubtedly change as it has for millennium due to immigration. I am not quite sure why Brits would be worried about that.

    The British are fleeing their cities. They don’t want to die.

  5. You note, Iftikhar Ahmad did not address the subject in hand, that is of a young woman attacking and old man after claiming he touched her breasts.

    So Iftikhar was using a standard circular, a weapon of propaganda as from the Far Right or Far Left.

    This is the template.

    1. Establish a Big Lie from the get-go.

    National Socialism: God has created diverse human beings to live in this tiny global village of one family.

    International Socialism: “Mankind is a body of diverse human beings to live in this tiny global village of one family.”

    The truth: mankind have evolved from primates into diverse human beings and is continuing to evolve. The only laws required are ‘thou shall not’ to determine who are the outlaws that harm the others.

    Socialists determine ‘thou shalt’ because they are control-freak paranoid sociopathic behaviorists.

    2. Use false science.

    Creation by its very nature is diverse with different species, different communities, different cultures and languages.
    Creation is not Diverse. Animals compete and the eventual winner fills that niche. It’s called the food chain. A fox and a chicken are not diverse.

    These differences represent the beauty and wonder but diversity is sometimes not fully appreciated, resulting in all sorts of clashes.

    This ‘wonder’ is based on ignorance.

    3. Use false instruction.

    The British society and Establishment must learn to respect and accommodate others, as if in a family.

    Note the same way some use the word “love” as here the word “family” is employed as a universal, homogenous equal term.

    They are nothing of the sort with lesser and greater meanings. If a member of your family starts touching people’s todgers or wants to destroy your home for being kuffar, that person is excluded for the safety of the children. There is no ‘universal family’ that any criminal and deviants belong to. They exclude themselves from civilized society. However, in Socialism there are no prisons to separate the human family from the United Fraternity of Socialist Deviants, because in these societies it is one big open prison with surveillance cameras and Community Enforcement Officers to police the non-deviant with a culture of fear not to offend.

    Socialist and Muslims are not civilized. Listen to how they speak in private to each other.

    When you enter a person’s home, you respect their values and customs. British Society is made to feel it owes the world, to dhimmi itself for cheap industrial wares from Communist China and cheap oil from Islamic caliphates. Because the British Public schoolboy is bisexual and takes it both ways, this is how he imprints his identity on the rest of the country. Britain is no more than a diplomatic outpost where the natives must be divided and ruled.

    4. Use false inferences.

    A Muslim is a citizen of this tiny global village. He/she does not want to become notoriously monolingual Brit. He/she is supposed to be well versed in standard English, Arabic, Urdu and other community languages, to be part of the British society, as well as proud of his/her cultural roots and enjoy the beauty of his/her literature and poetry.

    There are many Muslims who had once assimilated into British life and dropped their religion to a mere token of a barbaric past. The new influx of hundreds of thousands have no respect for the country.

    They once came because they wanted to have the same opportunities the British people once enjoyed. In the last 10 years a deliberate European Scorched Earth Policy of Diversity using the welfare and housing stock paid for by British people to bring about a New Order of a European Zone. Criminals who breed on Welfare, those women who steal children from their one night stands and are proud of their crudeness, are no longer willing to learn to be independent but fill their heads with “Allah is Great” and “Man-Boy Love” and then vote for them.

    5. Lie about the country’s past

    During colonial days, British did not follow local customs or culture. They didn’t exactly “go native”. They even forced the native Americans and native Australian to adopt all the evils of their culture and customs. They are still the underdogs of American and Australian societies. At least Australian Prime Minister apologized to the natives for their evil deeds.

    The British Common Wealth is a testament to the success of the British Empire. Nigerians look at South Africa and wished the British had not left so soon. Countries could not wish the Muslims left soon enough.

    6. Use Marxist cultural relativism

    Brits living in Spain and France don’t even bother learning the language of the new adopted country.

    We know these Brits are slobs. But then you use it to argue why Muslims equally don’t assimilate. It is like the feminist who judges her equality by living like the most deviant male, or the sexual-pervert gang-banging his way to family values.

    7. Express faux outrage

    Frankly suggesting that people don’t want to become “British” they should move elsewhere is extremely irritating.

    8. Lie again.

    Immigrants are in UK because they are needed, it was never an act of charity.Without migration, British economy and society will bleed to death.

    Industries exported to China, large unemployment and the culture of welfare-dependency. Nope, I can’t think any other reason for importing the most unintelligent from around the world other than it was political, like when Russia displaced its indigenous populations across the whole country to create a massive Russian federation of soviet states.
    A dumbed-down Public Service and Media. Bankrupt. The Detroit of Europe.

    9. Deceive
    British culture and customs will undoubtedly change as it has for millennium due to immigration. I am not quite sure why Brits would be worried about that.

    The British are fleeing their cities. They don’t want to die.

  6. Newpaper states: “Sorry we are unable to accept comments for legal reasons.”
    Well of course they can’t, since any British woman who grew up in the 1960s/1970s was told by police – “if groped in a public place scream out what he has done to anyone listening and try to mark him for later identification”.
    Women have been attacked in trains and on the street. Nowadays it seems women are supposed to thank the attacker for the attention.
    We (women) are still more than 50% of the population, instead of covering up or avoiding the area, let us insist that women are shown more respect in public. Let us have a 100% turn out at the next election.

  7. @Iftikhar Ahmad
    As good little colonizers, the Pakistanis have moral duty to teach Urdu to the indigenous British. Also, could you explain how Pakistan became Muslim? 😀

  8. A report published by UK Young Ambassadors (UKYA) includes results of consultations held with almost 1,000 11- to 25-year-olds over three months, with 11 per cent from migrant backgrounds. More than half of the young people who had witnessed or experienced discrimination said it took the form of verbal abuse, while more than a quarter described it as “social or legal discrimination”. Other findings in the report suggest young people feel politicians fuel negative portrayals of migrants through “anti-immigration” talk and using terms that isolate migrant communities, such as “British jobs for British people”. Tamanna Miah, a young ambassador involved in the research, said it was “shocking to see so much appalling prejudice against people who are part of our diverse society”. She added: “Being a second-generation migrant myself I can really relate to the daily challenges that young migrants face despite having lived in the UK for the majority of my life.” The report includes recommendations to improve young migrant people’s participation, such as the government providing better funding for language classes. British Youth Council vice-chair for participation and development, Carly Walker–Dawson, said: “Everyone has a duty to reach out and welcome young people from migrant backgrounds, especially through organised groups or representative networks.” UKYA collected the data in the report through online surveys, consultation workshops, interviews and a roundtable meeting. The report was published to mark yesterday’s International Youth Day, which took the theme of young migrants. – See more at: http://www.cypnow.co.uk/cyp/news/1078064/majority-migrants-discrimination?
    IA
    http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

  9. As individuals we can choose to follow any religion without persecution. This school provides a choice for parents whom want to teach Islamic values to their children. What is the problem with choice?
    Anything Muslim is met with negativity by most people in this country. get over it, I don’t see anyone complaining about St John’s or St Edmunds Catholic schools? If Muslims people want to send their children to a Muslim school, what difference does it make to you???

    Seriously, don’t worry about the kids not integrating in society, Saying all kids who go to a single faith school won’t integrate is like saying that all kids who go to a single sex school will grow up gay. It’s such an idiotic point but not a surprising one for your typical insular Portsmouth citizen.
    IA

  10. Did you forget how your white asses came on boats, robbed people of their wealth from colonies in East? And killed and tortured them? Did you ´integrate´ then? You Britishers are-were nothing but thieves. Majority British population does not know its own history of crimes against humanity because your government there wants to regiment you with false propaganda and tell you bed time stories about your ´royalty´… who were, as I said, nothing but thieves.

    As a British Asian myself, and a Muslim, I tend to disagree with Warsi. I am deeply proud of my heritage and language. At home I speak my own languages, Punjabi and Urdu. When out and about with family, I speak in Urdu etc. I will speak in whatever language I like. Nobody, absolutely nobody will tell us what language to speak. Obviously I appreciate everyone living here should be able to speak a bit of English. But its not a must, especially for elders. After all, look at how many white brits move to other nations yet refuse to learn the languages? No, they expect others to learn or speak English, and the brits just don’t wanna integrate. If u white brits don’t do it when u move to other nations, don’t expect or demand other others, Asians, Africans etc to have to learn English to fit in. Warsi is now selling out, turning on her own kind just to fit in. Me, I’m Asian, I’m proud of my languages and if it riles others when they cant understand our conversations, well get over it.

    We are told that child sex abuse happens ‘in all communities’, that white men are really far more likely to be abusers, as has been shown by the fall-out from the Jimmy Saville case. The people who let these girls down were the social workers & police & the judges who made the orders for these kids to be in care! I note that it is always “we will investigate why it went wrong, lessons will be learnt, we will review care plans in the future” but nothing happens. They should work with families to keep them at home as they are the ones who pick up the pieces when, if, they return home damaged. They will return home damaged as putting them in care in the first place damages them! I feel so sorry for these abandoned children. No love or kindness or attention at home so they look elsewhere and are taken in and taken over by these appalling men who are not allowed to touch Muslim women in this way so take advantage of these poor children. Then the children are let down by social workers and the police who won’t believe them or can’t be bothered to investigate, so letting these children down even more. Did anybody hear the Head of Social Services, she said one employee has been sacked why only one surely the employee’s manager should have known about this and that managers manager all the way to where the buck stops. And she said I am not going to resign, she thinks that the one employee is enough to stop any more bad comments about her social services team, and the police. A question it is not politically correct, how many females are in charge of social services where the social services have failed young children?

    Muslim community is a part and parcel of the British society paying taxes like any other law-abiding citizen of the United Kingdom. According to the Education Act of 1944, the children should be educated according to the needs and demands of the parents. It is the parents who are going to decide what kind of education their children will receive. The Muslim community was not satisfied, therefore, they decided to set up Muslim schools and not faith based schools. The number of Muslim children is on the increase due to high birth rate, immigration and conversion. We do not have the resources to set up schools for each and every child. Now the only alternative is that those schools where the Muslim pupils are in majority should be managed and controlled by Muslim Educational Trusts and Charities just like private companies managing failing state schools in Islington and Surrey. This demand is in accordance with the law of the land and nothing to do with Islam. There is no shortage of state schools where Muslim pupils are in majority one can easily find them in all big cities inner areas.

    The Muslim schools will follow National Curriculum along with Islamic studies and Islamic History based on The Holly Quran and Sunnah. There is no place for Comparative Religion and European Languages. English will be the medium of instruction because it is an economic and social language for communication in the global village. Special attention will be given to its teaching right from Nursery level by qualified British educated teachers, but Arabic, Urdu and Islamic studies will be taught by qualified Muslim teachers from abroad. Arabic and Urdu will be taught as religious, social and emotional languages, so that the Muslim children do not find themselves cut off from their roots. It will help them to develop Islamic Identity crucial for mental, emotional and personality development. The multicultural policy of the LEAs could not improve race relation and the recent riots are the clear examples of its failure.

    The Muslim community has been passing through a phase of fourth Crusades. The battleground is the field of education, where the young generation will be educated properly with the Holly Quran in one hand and Sciences in other hand to serve the British society and the world at large. A true Muslim is a citizen of the world, which has become a small global village. We are going to prepare our youth to achieve that objective in the long run. A true Muslim believes in Prophet Moses and the Prophet Jesus and without them one cannot be a Muslim. My suggestion is that in all state, independent and Christian based school special attention should be given to the teaching of Comparative Religion and Islam should be taught by qualified Muslim Teachers to make the children aware the closeness of Islam to Christianity and Judaism which will help them to think about Islam, as “A Pragmatic and Modern Way of Life,” during their life time.
    IA
    http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

  11. Why has nobody pointed out the obvious? She was already attacking him when he put his hands out to defend himself. That is when he accidentally touched her chest! She then used this as an excuse to attack him further.

    This is a non-story!

  12. I read on a Sikh counter jihad forum that the boyfriend appeared to be hitting on the girl, the old man stepped in, literally between them to protect her, then she started on him. It was set up, could be why the camera was rolling. Anyway, hopefully it will all come in court.

  13. “This was a random attack. The Police are confused as to the motive of the teenager.” That’s how the story would run in the US if a black beat a white pensioner. When Muslims beat up whites the stories are suppressed. Look at the ethnic cleansing in Egypt, trick question you won’t see coverage outside of the counter jihad media! Look at what happened to the Serbs or the Greeks in the Ottoman Empire… who remembers any of that?

    The trouble with England is that the “Chavvy” remnant of the working class is being fed into a meat grinder as “Rayciss Scum worthy of death and flaying and dispossession” by Tarquin MA Cam and Penelope MA Oxon…These English kids have been abandoned to the wolves by the shepherds. They should have been armed and shipped over to invade and resettle some province in Africa or Asia instead of this slow genocide.

    The palpable hatred from ethnic commentators toward whites on Youtube, Mirror, Mail is obvious. Ignore the hostility at your peril chaps, eventually the savages will find you too. The assorted Third Worlders of all stripes do not like us. When Muslims have us in the same position that they have the Copts in Egypt or the Israelis the knives will come out and slit our throats in our own motherland. It’s a shame she got into a fight with a Sikh of course, they are generally quite Pro-English in outlook.

    As a product of the public school system our current overlords are not too concerned with this disorder. Their wealth inoculates them. Having Sikhs (Who are not really much of a problem as an individual case) and Muslims among us simply replicates Imperial model of “divide and rule” their grandfathers enjoyed in India or Ireland. It’s hard enough to deal with class stratification, adding race and religion and you always get these incidents.

    It’s a set up, the Whites are tyrannized by threats of being hauled into court as evil wicked “Rayciss!” scum and the invading third world can then lord it over the prostrated white majority as a new breed of diversity Commissars. Amazingly, it’s all sanctioned by editors, politicians and TV news producers who function a PC version of the Cheka (early Soviet secret police).

  14. Christianity is the culmination of Graeco-Roman civilization as expressed by the Latin Occident. It is teh crowning achievement of human civilization. It’s equal parts Platonic-Stoic with a gloss of Jewish bon mots.

    Islam is just a Ponzi scheme for freebooting desert pirates that plagiarizes the Christian hit parade and a twisted version of the meaning of Jewish folk tales.

  15. Hey Iffy, you didn’t answer my questions. Before the British invaded America, Africa etc., non-Muslim Europe suffered centuries of Muslim invasions. In order to circumvent Muslim lands, non-Muslim Europe started to “explore” other countries.

  16. iftikhara: “As individuals we can choose to follow any religion without persecution.”

    Bukhari, volume 9, #17: “Narrated Abdullah: Allah’s Messenger said, “The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Messenger, cannot be shed except in three cases:

    in Qisas (equality in punishment) for murder,
    a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and
    the one who reverts from Islam (Apostate) and leaves the Muslims.”

    You see how iftikhara uses words that mean one thing to him and one thing to you?

    “individuals” you think of as anyone. You even think Muslims as individuals as you consider religious people to be able to act on their own initiative.

    But he knows Muslims are not individuals. They look alike sound alike and act alike. They are slaves for Allah. Just as Communists are knee-jerk reactionaries. He means “individuals” means who are non-Muslims.

    And the deception goes on. The Socialists’ willing misunderstanding and the Fascists and Sexualphiles who enslave a generation. Because once you’ve submitted – you’re in.

  17. PerfectChild:

    The Islamic device of using common words in a proprietary way is an extremely important tactic in their arsenal against everyone else indeed. I even did a video series on a few of the common ones like ‘defending islam’ which really means justification to attack anyone who defends themselves from being forcibly subjected to sharia etc. and of course peace, slander, (anything that puts Islam in a bad light with zero importance placed on the truth of any given matter) and so on.

    So thank you for pointing out how faithful to the standard set of tricks Iftikhar uses here. I also noticed on this thread how he seems to have moved from Mecca style victim-face tactics to aggressive PC based accusations of the evil deeds of Europeans. That was so unexpected it was almost refreshing. However like all his posts it begins with a massive lie so distorting any reality that, for me at least, it is very hard to read all that follows as the premise is more attack than fact.

    I hope someday all muslims like him can go back to Islamic lands in the middle east and practice that stuff on each other. What a shame for Iftilhar that even the Arabs are getting fed up with it. Maybe we need to hire a few thousand Egyptians to go to England and show them how to get rid of that particular threat.

  18. The British Empire morphed. There were several British empires. the British government learned due to the American revolution. That is one place to make a break. Canada was rule differently than the U.S. because the British learned. After the American revolution for example Quebec was give much autonomy. When the Americans invaded in 1812 expected roses, they were shocked.

    The British in China ruled like Mandarins that is according to local customs so as to not make waves.

    The British in India like in America practised Mercantalism. This is not defensible. but I still think that British rule in India was better and preferrable to Muslim rule where they filled the rives with the bodies of Hindus. The mercantalism shows in some respect where the British did not learn or refused. Still British rule was better than Mughal rule.Northing like taking a city and killing everyone like the Muslims did. .

    Also one might say there where 3 British empires. an English one, an Irish one and a Scottish one. They all filled different niches.

  19. The French SPanish and British founded new civilizations as pioneers. The Muslims on the other hand are parasitic. The Ottomans could have easily colonized parts of the new world. But that would have required hard work. It was easier to invade and trash Egypt, Visigothic Spain, assault Constantinople, wreck Syria. They are only in the US today to cheat and steal from the white population. Rich pickings for piracy.

  20. Since it’s easy to paste a soundbite over a video recording and thus distort the truth, all the more when there’s no close-ups of the face with the lips moving, I am skeptical of things like this. I’m just saying.

  21. Doesnt it seem strange that a 80 year old man would walk upto a girl in a group to touch her tits?

    Perhaps in their “dust-up” it may have hit her tits.

  22. Kulwant: Yes that is certainly possible. But the knee jerk reaction of the media to this clip offended the crap out of me. Everyone assumed that this girl was a racist, the great ideological crime of our age, tantamount to a Nazi, and worked from that assumption. The one I gave is more likely as at least their is evidence to support it albeit just what she said on this clip. Hopefully the court will determine the facts and a just solution will be found. If it was an unprovoked attack by this girl then she deserves punishment. But if it wasn’t then she deserves a major apology from mass media and compensation.

  23. Eeyore is a sick individual with no life!! She is some sick screwed up bit*h with no shame or common sense. This poor sikh gentleman DID NOT touch her and neither did the attacker say that -she’d be a liar to use it as a get out of jail card like many girls do when they are caught committing crime – falsely accuse someone of rape, assault or groping.

    Also all the lunatics who have followed this stupid sick version of events by this loser EEOYRE are sick – hope she gets her sick face kicked in and then accused of starting it!

    Just because the criminal is a woman, we all race to defend her even though she committed the most despicable savage attack on a defenceless 80 year old frail man. I’m ashamed of being a woman after seeing the video and all the sick comments on this page!!

    If that was my grandfather/father I would have killed her by now, as would anyone!

    I now hope that when she goes to jail her fellow inmates torture and beat her to death slowly!

    Go to hell you sick feminist bitches.

    Most of us women are NOT sick like you.

  24. perfectchild,
    Thanks, you really do have a lot to teach me. I can’t always follow sociology/psychology comments because I haven’t studied the basics. When you break it down, you do it so very well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*