A few thoughts on the Clancy murder trial as part of a mass line attack on the sanctity of life: The weaponization of the response to it

Yesterday we posted 3 videos that offer a kind of overarching world view on how feminism was predicted, and then fulfilled to be an attack on Western civilization and especially on women. This video was left in the comments. It is quite interesting and gets more so in the last 3rd where it makes biological and evolutionary arguments for and against the state of things today. For and against not in the moral judgement sense but in the ‘how these disciplines shape the current state of the culture and attitudes’ way.

Watching it though, started us thinking about how the judgement and attitudes on the well publicized case of Lindsay Clancy who killed her 3 children might be seen through the lens of information warfare.

First, looking at the definition of a Maoist Mass Line Narrative attack, the idea that the state has an objective in mind – they then drop a narrative into the media which the media broadcasts out to the public, and the public which sees themselves as good or smarter than average people pick up and start to parrot and then form political tribes around these narratives, which the state then re-frames as the actual voice of the people and so the state can now do its will claiming that in fact it was the Vox populi, the people’s voice when really its closer to something from MK Ultra of the masses. Now the state can do whatever it wanted in the first place claiming it’s what the Intelligentsia and regular folks wanted. This also helps to explain the curious oft repeated phrase of Justin Trudeau and now Mark Carney, where he would patiently explain to Canadians what exactly their values are. This was part of the mass-line feedback loop.

This is assisted of course by critical theory attacks on all who resist the narrative. Usually with the now familiar terms of racism, homophobia, islamophobia, supremacy and a number of other terms used to negate any opinion that is in opposition to a state narrative sent out as a mass line.

Now if we look at what the state actually wants, (and we ascertain this by looking at multiple recent policies which are in stark contradiction to Western culture and legal frameworks) we can see a couple of glaring things once you kick the dirt off the glow just under the surface. The first is the total destruction of the Judaeo-Christian concept of the sanctity of life. The amplification of this trial and all the noise around it, especially the amplification of those sympathetic to the murders (most notably feminists) is an acid to the belief in the sanctity of life as it dissolves it over repetition of how women support these killings.

But a second reason could also be the normalization of Islamic honour killings of their children. This is a stone cold fact very well explained in the book of Islamic Jurisprudence for Muslims living in non-Muslim lands called, The Reliance of the Traveler, and is a lot more common than the media would let you believe. While many of them have happened even in our minor city of about a million people, 1.the media downplays or eliminates the Islamic motives for these killings. Also when Muslim men murder their wives. This receives from zero to a small amount of press coverage compared to a white male with a sign who might object to one of these Leftist world changing mass lines. We saw this during Covid. At that time site speculated that at least a part of the mask BS that was being strictly enforced in most or all of Canada, was to normalize face veils on Muslims, or give Muslims a way of veiling that looked like it was a public health measure. We still see Muslim women on the streets today wearing those five cent surgical masks outdoors on a hot sunny day with the head cloth and other Islamic clothing. So it’s unlikely to be the leftist uniform symbolizing contempt for “capitalist society” that it has become now since you usually also see tattoos piercings and unnatural hair colour along with the masks in that case.

(The following photo is from the one allowable holiday among communists. May 1st. Masks were everywhere even in 2026 with people handing out free ones. It clearly had nothing to do with disease)

So we see the potential of the Clancy case to accelerate two state objectives. The destruction of the sanctity of life in general, which they also did from the making of abortion into a sacrament, and MAiD which is now a well greased slippery slope to the state just killing anyone it wants to based on category, Categories the state imputes attributes on, so no one is safe, as anyone can suddenly find themselves in a category that MAiD allows for and is encouraged. And the normalization of sharia cultural and legal architecture of murdering women and children for reasons of honour.

1.As a footnote, we would point out how the excellent website, Blazing Cat Fur once caught the CBC editing an audio file released by the RCMP about the Mohammad Shafia murders where he killed one of his wives and three daughters with the help of his sons by putting them in a car and shoving the car into a canal drawing them all. Shafia had said that “they had betrayed Islam” as one of his motives for killing them. The CBC edited that out but after Blazing Cat fur posted the CBC version and the original RCMP side by side, CBC put in the unredacted one. Actually unredacted is the wrong word. Redaction is MUCH more honest than what the CBC did because with a redaction you know there is additional material you cant see. A known unknown. What CBC did was reframe the entire issue by presenting something as authentic information which was actually propaganda.