I’m sure everyone is aware of this by now. Bt it is not trivial. In the flood of real information and simultaneous target obscuring, disinformation that followed the release of the mRNA gene therapy shots, this is actually a shiny diamond in a giant and deliberately made great lake of propaganda mud. This is not something that can be dismissed by Hanlon’s Razor, which is the typical response of anyone still determined to maintain faith in a system which now works against individualism. This is proof of who knew what and when. This means that authorities were not wrong. They were lying. This matters. A lot.
Below, the CDC spokesman, Peter marks makes it clear that pregnant and breastfeeding women should get these shots.
This was released as an official communique from the CDC on May 19, 2022
Up to this point, pretty much everything was dismissible by a determined detractor. Political authorities flagrantly defying their own edicts was to our mind the proof they were lying. We saw that a lot. When the cameras were off, they would remove their masks and gather fat private parties, arranging restaurants to be opened for them and many more events like that. But detractors could dismiss it one way or another.
This is another matter though. This is them admitting they knew. The forced release of the Pfizer papers should have been enough. The massive amounts of post vaxx deaths should have been enough., After all they stopped the Swine flu vaccine, which was a regular vaccine, after I think 40 deaths. This was at least 2 orders of magnitude greater than that in mortality overall. (I will catch flak from both sides for that off the cuff estimate I know)
This was, as readers of this site know, in effect a communist revolution where reality and science are sidelined for arbitrary state diktats. But this might offer a chance to pull civilization out of the fire.
As an afterthought, this also puts the prosecution of Helen Grus into sharp relief. While it was already clear this was a political prosecution and not a breach of conduct one, anything but a complete dismissal of her case makes it clear what this is really about. Protecting a state narrative attack on the public.
