Several news stories and flippant to serious analysis of them to clarify the nature of the state of The United Socialist Provinces of Canada: Links 1 for June 19, 2026

On June 17, a news release said a day later, Ottawa police received a report that four children under age 12 were approached by an unknown man driving a sport utility vehicle near the community centre. The man reportedly made inappropriate sexual comments toward the children before leaving the area.

Further down at the bottom of the article there is an illustration of a white middle aged man with white har and glasses, which, if you read quickly you might think was a court house sketch, but is actually apparently part of an advert for some kind of retirement savings thing.

But if you connect the next item to it, it takes more shape:

2. A 3 year old boy thrown into an alligator pit

Not an absolute truth but 100% consistent with modern reality across Western Europe and in particular, the Commonwealth, which at this point is better referred to as the COMINTERN.

I asked Grok about this case:

This X post is about a completely separate (and horrific) incident on June 18, 2026, at Johnsons of Old Hurst zoo in Cambridgeshire, UK. A 3-year-old boy was thrown into a crocodile enclosure and suffered serious injuries. A 30-year-old man from Norfolk was arrested on suspicion of attempted murder. He has since been released on bail (until September 18) because he was deemed unfit to be interviewed (likely mental health-related).
bbc.co.uk

Police and all news outlets (BBC, Guardian, Telegraph, etc.) are still only referring to him as “a 30-year-old man from Norfolk” with no name, photo, or further identifying details released.
theguardian.com

Our guess is the ONLY part of the description that is true is ‘man’. We would think he is not from ‘Norfolk’, not 30 and not mentally ill unless Islam is a mental illness. And books could be and should be written about that. People should feel safe though, that an unnamed person is walking around free who pushes kids into alligator pits.

3. In case you think we have posted too much on Bill C-22, it looks more and more like no amount is enough. Gotta say though, Canadians at this point deserve what they are getting. They are demoralized to the point that Yuri Bezmenov claimed people would be. You can show them all the evidence to the point of walking them to the Gulags and they won’t believe what is happening till they are being interrogated by one of the Organs.

The article he discusses is here to be sure Mario is not misrepresenting the situation. 

An excerpt:

The government is planning to shut down hearings into Bill C-22, the lawful access bill, with no further debate or discussion on potential amendments to the bill. It has just placed a motion on the Order Paper that would limit today’s committee meeting to only 30 minutes for standard clause-by-clause review. After that, it plans to cancel all further debate or discussion on any other amendments. The committee will instead be required to vote on all remaining amendments with no further debate, discussions or questions to officials. In fact, the substance of the amendments will remain secret and will not even be disclosed to the public. The government’s intent is clearly to complete clause-by-clause review tonight to ensure that the bill passes through the House of Commons by the end of the week

Yesterday, the government introduced privacy reforms that shuts down the Privacy Commissioner of Canada’s role in private sector privacy regulation. Today, it is shutting down hearings into one of the biggest privacy threats in years. Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree had committed to amendments during the lawful access hearings, but this move means that only secret government amendments that will not be made public during the hearing will pass. Opposition parties have submitted many amendments based on testimony from the Privacy Commissioner, bar associations, security companies, and privacy experts. These include potential changes to the rules on mandatory metadata retention, risks to security and encryption, and privacy safeguards. None of these amendments will even be made public, let alone open to debate and discussion. Weeks of hearings and public concern tossed aside by the government in a rush to shut down debate and consideration of amendments to a deeply flawed, risky legislative plan.

The police are officially lobbying for bill C-22. One wonders why. Is it to “keep us safe”?

I think we posted something on this yesterday but it dovetails to well here not to post it again.

Just to tie these bills together:

The full text of the Tweet:

The Carney government is preparing internet censorship on the British model (oh surprise!).

Four bills are currently advancing in Ottawa with four different justifications, but forming a single architecture

1. C-8 allows a minister to order your internet cut off without a judge and with a prohibition on talking about it;

2. C-9 expands speech offenses and removes the attorney general’s filter on prosecutions;

3. C-22 requires providers to retain one year of metadata and location data for everyone. Not just suspects but for the entire population;

4. C-34 is sold as a ban on social media for those under 16. In practice, verifying the age of minors requires identifying all adults.

Taken in isolation, each bill has a defensible justification: cybersecurity, hate, crime, children.

Assembled, they form a closed loop:

Identify everyone (C-34) and log everyone (C-22), then redefine acceptable speech (C-9) and finally disconnect the recalcitrants (C-8).

Under Carney, Canada will sink into progressive authoritarianism and the repression of ideological dissidents.

4. Andrew Bostom did an interview today about the Iran war. In part, he lays the blame on the Iranian people. They blew an opportunity. As he said, they DID manage to take to the streets and overthrow the Shaw, which led almost immediately to the reinstatement of a theocratic Shiia totalitarian regime. So why didn’t they take the opportunity to overthrow the Mullahs and create a Republic? Or even the new Kingdom they seem to want? Maybe because not enough of them wanted it enough to hit the pavement. Apparently a recent poll said 85% of the Iranians want sharia law. You can hear Andrew’s interview at the 10 minute mark at this link.

5. Now and again when one tries to explain the communist nature of Carney’s actions and intentions, one gets pushback. Carney is rich, carney is a banker etc. etc.

Here is a photo of Lenin’s country cottage and retreat. Yes, it was state owned officially. But was for his private use for life, and any attack or breach of it would be treated as if it was an attack or breach of Lenin’s private property.

Very similar to the Governor General’s palace in Ottawa actually.

Thank you all for checking out this site