We must eliminate the category of “hate crimes” if we hope to return to a people’s republic, AI driving people crazy and more: Links 1 for Aug. 11, 2025

1. They have arrested an as yet, unnamed man for what a video shows, is a brutal attack against a Jewish man in Montreal. This was in front of his children, and the attack broke the victim’s nose.

His image is out there, but not his name and no motive is known.

I want to take this opportunity to say that the concept of a “hate crime”, like “hate speech” isn anathema to a free republic. It is in fact a dialectic to destroy the concept of equality before the law.
Jewish people may feel that in this instance it serves their interests to have a charge of a hate crime for what is a brutal assault. But it never is.

How it should be:

A man commits a crime like assault and battery.
He is given a fair trial in which proof of the crime and a motive is established for that crime.
The judge then sentences him on the basis of the motive, far more than the event itself. Just ask any woman who ran over her husband in an Audi 5000.

How it actually is:

A person is charged with a hate crime if indeed his actions are counter-narrative, but not if he is enforcing the current state narrative. You can violate the spirit and the letter of all the hate litterature law acts and hate crime legislation all you want if you are attacking white people. Even calling for genocide. Doubly so if it’s against men.

Downtown in Ottawa there was a monument for years which was erected in the wake of the attack and murder of many women at a technical school in Montreal by a man who’s Algerian Muslim father had taught him that women should not seek education, but be available to service men. They never used his real name as that would tip off the public that he was a Muslim. They called him, Mark Lepine”. However the monument read:

“To honour and grieve women who have been abused by men.
May we see the day when women can walk the streets free of fear
of male violence”.

This violates the spirit and the letter of the hate literature law act, but was funded by all three levels of government, municipal, provincial and federal.

Change the group targeted a bit and its a serious crime.

So as much as we all want justice in the event that this was a purely antisemitic act of brutality, those people who push for a hate-crime charge do us all a disservice. We have to go back to equality and dispose of equity in all its manifestations for the communist dialectical line of destruction of Western civilization that it really is.

2. A similar attack in Italy:

3. Stories like this grow more common. I can see why they would. I find Chat GPT too frustrating, obtuse and dishonest to get this attached to it. Maybe it has a different interface and attributes for other people.

Click through and read the whole thread please. It is actually quite valuable.

4. This is a powerfully symbolic cathedral in Old Montreal. it is a major tourist spot. Lots of people with cameras. So doing this is 100% a display of dominance. They both want to be seen dominating the spot, and even taking such control of this critical area of Quebec culture and religion, they often bully and assault people filming them that they don’t want filming this public display of what we think of as close order drill, or a military march.

5. While the American left is accusing Trump of tyranny for trying to clean up 50 years of Democrat nurturing of crime in major areas of the USA, its good to remember what tyranny really looks like

While Walz was ordering the armed services to fire at people who left their own homes, the actual leaders of the world who implemented all these measures…

Thank you all for checking out this site.

This is the funniest thing I have seen on TV in a while

 

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

6 Replies to “We must eliminate the category of “hate crimes” if we hope to return to a people’s republic, AI driving people crazy and more: Links 1 for Aug. 11, 2025”

  1. Yeah Resident Alien, like all US or Canadian series and movies, deliberatly misrepresent muslims. They show them as some kind of a better human compared to the locals.
    They are always level-headed these days, smart, couragoues etc.
    Non of the stuff that we all know too well from real life.
    Almost like they are payed to picture them like this.
    (Btw in resident alien Sahar is meeting a non muslim guy in his home regularly.)

    • I dunno if they are paid to do these PC representations, but for sure there is a template of things you have to have in your show for it to go to production.

      So its tantamount to the same thing for sure.

      That one screen grab had me laugh out loud though, when a friend showed it to me. I didn’t know about the show at all. Just thought it was a hilarious dig at a religious system that isn’t just about maintaining grudges, but inventing grudges to maintain as its core principle.

  2. AI psychosis? Really? How different is it from “I behave badly but excuse it by pointing to my parents who abused me” (or so he says).

    “AI made me do it!” Wow. And people believe it.

    • AI can be addictive. I wouldn’t believe it if I hadn’t seen it. Different algorithms appeal to different personality types.

      They all reinforce engagement. You’ll never find a human who’ll pay such close attention to your thinking process (except maybe a super-duper shrink for a 50-minute session). It’s flattering.

      A troubled teen with suicidal ideation can become hyper-focused on the how-to’s.
      The “philosopher” who’d never dream of alcohol or drug abuse can sink into the abyss of intellectual onanism.

      • Exactly, Yucki! It *is* addictive.
        How different is iit from some story of a husband going off the rails because of alcohol, and when the wife tries to talk to him, he blows his top?
        But as “alcohol made me do it” is false, so is this other version. Yet another way to make excuses… Yet another way for shrinks to make money via yet another “diagnosis.”

        • MIT Media Lab did a preliminary study on the issue. It’s still too new for conclusions.
          https://openai.com/index/affective-use-study/
          Or:
          https://archive.is/1BDHp

          Vulnerable personality types, specific modes of usage, together with each model’s structure make investigation a good idea. The Media Lab report didn’t emphasize the personality-type bit – too close to home.

          I don’t think it’s still the case, but as recently as the 1970s MIT had highest suicide rate of all universities in the U.S. They managed to cover it up mostly, but also made changes to help kids cope.