1. Iconic Sauble Beach sign changed overnight ahead of Canada Day
An iconic sign that for decades has greeted beachgoers upon arrival to a popular beach on the Lake Huron shoreline was switched up on Canada Day. […]
Following a court decision that solidified ownership of a roughly two-kilometre stretch of land to the Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation, the recognizable, red-lettered Sauble Beach changed overnight, catching elected officials and visitors by complete surprise.
2. This is a calm, clear headed analysis of the British political landscape at this time. Initially, the description of the interview subject as a “prominent academic” set my warning lights off as it is the kind of anaesthetically effective language used to prepare people for usually leftist propaganda, but also controlled opposition operations.
This is a worthwhile look though from a very practical point of view. I suspect the take away may be that the Starmer government is deploying a great deal of anti-Russian jingoism to get the UK to prepare for a civil war that will most certainly be caused by Starmer’s own communist policies. But Prof. Hasley’s remarks here about the real threats and equations facing GB, Israel etc. are quite refreshing. The Russians are not going in to rural England and taking over towns. They don’t have the manpower for one thing. Russia is not the Roman Empire, or even the Nazis whose motives included “Lebensraum”, or living space for a population that still had babies at that point. Russia’s motives are likely what they always have been, Trying to establish the critical ports and accesses a country which is enormous and structured in a way that is very difficult to service. This was a content from the Czar’s and even in the Soviet Union, although communism saw to it that they did it very very badly.
Stalin actually launched a propaganda campaign explaining how the Soviets were superior to the ancient Egyptians, because 3000 years earlier, the Egyptians built the pyramids but with more sophisticated tools than Stalin’s Gulag inmates had, to build the White Sea-Baltic Canal.
But back to this video. It feels like Starmer has launched an active-measure against the British Public using anti-Russian jingoism and fear mongering.
Please feel free to leave comments if you feel I am misunderstanding or misrepresenting the speaker here, or if I generally have this wrong.
3. Here is some really instructive enemy propaganda as controlled opposition by Global News. It appears to be about the government failure in its programs to deal with those who suffered vaxx injuries thanks to Global, CBC, and CTV propaganda campaigns that helped coerce something like 80% of the Canadian population to inject multiple doses of this product into themselves.
Let’s review the evidence.
Global never had a real expert on to question the need for a vaccine for Covid, let alone the experimental nature of gene therapies.
Global treated all truth and reality around the mRNA shots as “conspiracy theories”
Global did fear mongering along with CBC and CTV to the same amplitude and frequency as each.
In this clip they slip in that the victim’s husband “still believes in science” propagating the narrative that state diktats on things are science, while actual science is a conspiracy theory if it challenges state narratives.
This ‘story’ comes out when no one but no one, not the most dedicated lefty state toady is still taking the stuff. In other words, they are getting out front of the narrative as it is now, and not contradicting it whatsoever. Global is once again making it appear that they speak truth to power, representing people injured by the state, while really positioning themselves to be amplifiers and enforcers of the next state narrative attack on us. Global Warming, ‘Palestine’, the introduction of other freedom crushing measures like CBDCs, or deracination by mass immigration or others we don’t know about yet or have forgotten there have been so many.
Global News, CBC and CTV are more guilty of crimes against humanity, even than Trudeau. They had a fiduciary responsibility to create informed consent, or more importantly, informed refusal of state diktats. Someday people must hold Nuremberg Trials and put these agencies on the stand. Even if it is just symbolic and without state participation, but done in a procedurally correct way with a good defence lawyer for the accused. Maybe this would be a great project for the NCI.
I think I know what the verdict would be though. Here is just SOME Sworn testimony by a veteran CBC journalist at previous NCI hearings:
To a now-retired R&D scientist in the life sciences myself, there were numerous cues or “tells” that things were seriously awry concerning the so-called “Covid vaccines.” But we need look at only a few of them to grasp what was going on.
The big pharma companies, J&J, Pfizer and Moderna – did something absolutely unprecedented prior to the launch of their new products: They petitioned Congress for legal indemnity before the fact. Which they got.
Why would any reputable company demand such legal protection beforehand unless it knew troubled waters lay ahead? Unless it knew a priori that its products were likely to cause harm?
A second major tip-off was that the scientific-medical definition of the word “vaccine” was quietly changed in the years and months leading up to the Covid-19 episode. A definition which has been in effect for over two hundred years.
The drug companies needed legal wiggle room, because they knew – just as the architects of this whole plan knew – that their compounds were in no real sense of the word “vaccines,” but instead genetic modulators disguised as vaccines.
They knew that their drugs would alter the genome of the subjects to whom they were given. And in ways detrimental to human health.
A third tip-off was that the rollout of Covid-19 “vaccines” was accompanied by the largest and most-concerted propaganda campaign yet seen in human history, one designed to gaslight and manipulate people into taking these agents.
Why on earth was such an over-the-top pressure campaign needed? For an illness whose fatality rate was well under one percent, and then mostly in those with pre-existing health problems and/or the elderly? It doesn’t add up.
The blunt fact of the matter is that those behind this scheme are guilty of violating the Nuremberg Code, the declaration which has guided ethical medical-scientific research since the end of the Second World War. In particular, the fact that all patients/subjects must be give informed consent prior to administration of any new agent.
“Informed” means that the patient has been given all of the known information about the risks and benefits of the compound/drug, when he/she was of sound mind and able to exercise mature judgment.
“Consent” means giving permission, freely and without coercion.
Clearly, neither of those conditions met.
Millions of people worldwide have paid with their lives or their heath, for the atrocities committed during this episode in history. Millions more lost their businesses and jobs.
Mere apologies aren’t enough. There needs to be a reckoning, both legally and morally.
100% and thank you very much for this comment.