Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.
This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.
So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.
This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.
For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like.
Poor Larry. He was so depressed.
In fact he had been depressed for a very long time. With a hand that felt like it weighed ten tons he dialed the Public Health Department. The voice at the end of the line said a nurse would be by within the hour. He was surprised to get such service from a government department. Usually it meant hours on the telephone. Not this time.
His doorbell rang and with a groan he stood and opened the door. The public nurse wore a white mask over her face. She was a middle-aged woman who looked more like a staff sergeant. She trundled in dutifully.
“May I sit?” she asked.
“Yes, please,” replied Larry waving his hand to the chair in the living room.
“I have some questions for you before we proceed.”
“Of course,” said Larry as he sat down on the sofa. The woman, professional in her manner, placed her reading glasses on her nose.
“For how long have you been depressed?”
“Since about the beginning of the plandemic.”
“You mean the pandemic, Mr. Schultz. So about five years. Have you been clinically diagnosed?”
“No.”
“Can you cite a reason or reasons for the way you feel? Have you spoken to friends and family about things?”
“I have no real friends or family any more,” said Larry clearing his throat. “They all left after the plandemic.”
“Did you receive a Covid shot, or multiple vaccinations?”
“No. Not one injection.”
“I see,” the woman said checking off a box on the form resting on her lap. “Can you explain to me, then, the reasons why you wish to be euthanized?”
“Well, the way I see it there is little to live for. Canada is quickly becoming a communist country. Mark Carney has managed to execute a coup. Climate change is a massive fraud. The planet isn’t burning. Our population is being replaced by sub-prime human waste. Canadians are not waking up to the dialectical carnage being applied to them. Identity politics is rampant. Now Canada is aligning with European globalist fascists instead of our American friends. Need I continue?”
“No, I’ve heard enough.”
“What is your name, by the way?” Larry asked.
“Fred. He/They. Sign right here, Mr. Schultz.” Larry signed the form. The nurse stood. “Your date is May first, two p.m. Please don’t be late because the clinic is fully booked.”
“I understand,” said Larry.
Larry showed Fred He/They to the front door. He bid her good day. She walked down the front path to the sidewalk, looking both ways before crossing the street to her electric car parked on the far curb. Just as she reached the middle of the road Larry remembered a question he had meant to ask. “Oh Fred, Fred!” Larry shouted. Fred stopped walking and turned around. “Should I wear a suit?”
“It doesn’t matter what you wear,” replied Fred.
Suddenly, out of nowhere, there appeared a city bus. It was driven by a man named Ali, who originated from Morocco. With a massive “thud” the bus hit Fred, killing her instantly. The bus didn’t even slow down. It kept on going.
Gee, thought Larry. That’s a sign. He stood at his doorway for a good long time. It felt like the weight that had been suffocating him for all these dark years was lifting. Wow, he thought. What the hell was he thinking? Maybe he would go to the pub for a beer tonight.
https://m.facebook.com/marketplace/item/1554456261910932/
Jason Kenney gave an interview on French CBC/Radio-Canada.
The post starts with ’many are quitting the X social media platform.
He is extremely concerned about the rapid rise in the number of Canadians that agree with joining the USA. He calls them ‘Trumpists, Radical Far-Rights, Extremists, Conspiracy Theorists, Trumpists, Dangerous….’
The same people who opposed the Covid jabs, he says. A menace to the economy, he adds.
The entire story is fraught with ugly words to stir up fear and hate.
https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/2148185/jason-kenney-trump-souverainete-canada
We know 20% of the population sees clearly. We know this from mRNA uptake refusal.
A woman on a tram in Germany suffered life-threatening injuries after she was covered with gasoline and set on fire by an unknown attacker in the small city of Gera.
At around 10 am local time, a 46-year-old woman was approached by an unknown assailant, who poured gasoline over her and set her on fire while on the Gera tram in eastern Thuringia.
Immediately after the woman was set ablaze, fellow passengers pressed the emergency stop button on the tram, police spokeswoman Katja Ridder said per Bild.
However, the attacker could flee the scene because the tram’s emergency stop function also opened all of the train doors.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/03/16/woman-doused-with-gasoline-and-set-on-fire-on-german-tram/
The Jewish Democratic Council of America (JDCA), which purports to represent Jewish points of view within the Democratic party, claims President Donald Trump made Jews “less safe” by deporting an anti-Israel Palestinian.
As Breitbart News reported, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested Mahmoud Khalil earlier this month, after the anti-Israel activist led radical protests, including illegal encampments, at Columbia University.
Many of these protests became explicitly antisemitic. Columbia’s failure to stop them ultimately led to the departure of university president Minouche Shafik last year — though such protests have resumed this year, regardless.
Khalil is currently awaiting deportation.
Halie Soifer, the CEO of the JDCA, claimed in an e-mail blast on Sunday that Khalil’s deportation actually makes American Jews less safe (original emphasis):
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/03/16/jewish-democratic-council-of-america-claims-trump-made-jews-less-safe-by-deporting-anti-israel-palestinian/
SKOPJE, North Macedonia (AP) – A massive fire tore through a nightclub in North Macedonia’s eastern town of Kocani early Sunday, killing 59 people and injuring 155, authorities said.
The blaze broke out around 2:35 a.m. during a concert by a local pop group at the Pulse nightclub, Interior Minister Panche Toshkovski told reporters.
He said pyrotechnics caused the roof to catch fire. Videos showed chaos inside the club, with young people running through the smoke as the musicians urged people to escape as quickly as possible.
As relatives gathered outside hospitals to await news, Kocani resident Dragi Stojanov was informed that his 21-year-old son Tomce had died in the fire.
“He was my only child. I don´t need my life anymore,” he said. “One hundred and fifty families have been devastated.”
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/03/16/59-dead-over-100-injured-in-nightclub-fire-in-north-macedonia/
Kim Kardashian Smeared as a ‘Nazi’ After Posing with Tesla Robot, Cyber Truck: ‘KKKardashian’
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2025/03/16/kim-kardashian-smeared-as-a-nazi-after-posing-with-tesla-robot-cyber-truck-kkkardashian/
Mass Deportations of Foreign Criminals and Illegal Migrants Supported by Overwhelming Majority of Britons
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/03/16/mass-deportations-of-foreign-criminals-and-illegal-migrants-supported-by-overwhelming-majority-of-britons/
South African University Votes to Keep Boycott of Israel Despite Losing Two-thirds of Donor Funding
https://www.breitbart.com/education/2025/03/15/south-african-university-votes-to-keep-boycott-of-israel-despite-losing-two-thirds-of-donor-funding/
Vivek Ramaswamy Proposes Eliminating Income Tax in Ohio
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/03/15/vivek-ramaswamy-proposes-eliminating-income-tax-in-ohio/
Minnesota Senate Republicans Propose Bill Adding ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ as Mental Illness
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/03/15/minnesota-senate-republicans-propose-bill-adding-trump-derangement-syndrome-as-mental-illness/
A groundbreaking study by Yale researchers (Bhattacharjee et al.) now confirms what many suspected: countless individuals labeled as Long COVID patients are actually suffering from post vaccination syndrome, a condition triggered by prolonged exposure to the spike protein produced by COVID vaccines. The study confirms that spike protein-claimed by health authorities to be harmless and short-lived- has been found lingering in vaccinated individuals for up to 709 days. The highest levels were observed in people who had never been infected with COVID but had received mRNA vaccines.
The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) announced that it has purchased 500,000 doses of an avian influenza vaccine for humans. PHAC referred to the purchase as its “initial” supply of GSK’s Arepanrix H5N1 A/ America vaccine, implying more may be to come.
a study published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (Diblasi et al.) reveals startling findings. “At least 55 undeclared chemical elements “ — including toxic arsenic, aluminum and mercury— were detected in COVID-19 shots. The groundbreaking analysis used Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) to uncover the cocktail.
German police hunt man who set wife on fire in tram
https://www.rte.ie/news/world/2025/0316/1502427-germany-tram-attack/
Police in Germany are hunting a man who doused his wife with flammable liquid in a tram and set fire to her, causing critical wounds.
The 46-year-old woman was targeted as she was inside the tram in Gera, in eastern Germany.
“She was sprayed with flammable liquid and set alight by a man,” police for the state of Thuringia said, clarifying later that the suspect was the victim’s husband.
When other passengers pressed the emergency stop button, the perpetrator took advantage of the doors opening to flee.
The tram’s driver used a fire extinguisher to put out the flames, but the woman sustained life-threatening wounds and was taken by helicopter to hospital.
The police said patrols “are actively searching for the perpetrator”, who was not yet identified but wanted for attempted murder.
Police published a photo of the alleged suspect, 46, who has Georgian roots, as well as a description of the clothes he was wearing at the time of the attack.
German police launch manhunt after woman set on fire in horror daylight attack on tram
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/german-police-launch-manhunt-after-34871994
Radical Clinton Judge Accuses Trump Admin of Violating His Court Order After He Rehires Thousands of Probationary Employees
thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/radical-clinton-judge-accuses-trump-admin-violating-his/
Mar. 16, 2025 2:20 pm
Judge William Alsup / Wikimedia Commons
US District Judge William Alsup, a Clinton appointee, declined to stay his previous order rehiring thousands of probationary employees across six federal agencies and accused the OPM chief of violating his court order.
Judge Alsup on Thursday said the Trump Administration’s Office of Personnel Management (OPM) illegally fired thousands of probationary employees.
The activist judge ordered the Trump Administration to rehire thousands of fired probationary employees in six federal agencies.
Alsup blasted the Trump Administration and said he felt “misled by the US Government” as he ordered six federal agencies to offer reinstatement to fired probationary workers.
“It is a sad day when our government would fire some good employee and say it was based on performance when they know good and well that’s a lie,” Judge Alsup said. “That should not have been done in our country. It was a sham in order to avoid statutory requirements.”
The six government agencies include: VA, DOD, Energy, Interior, Treasury and Agriculture.
On Saturday, Judge Alsup declined to pause his order and said the acting OPM Chief’s failure to testify violated his court order, Politico’s Josh Gerstein reported.
“This order pauses to address defendants’ attempts to frustrate fact-finding. The defense submitted a single declaration, from defendant Charles Ezell, in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for a TRO. The undersigned ordered defendant Ezell to appear for cross examination at the subsequent evidentiary hearing, or, alternatively, to submit to a deposition at his convenience. Plaintiffs were likewise ordered to make their declarants available for examination. Defendants chose to withdraw the Ezell declaration to avoid submitting its declarant to examination, in violation of this Court’s order,” the judge wrote.
JUST IN: Judge William Alsup declines to stay his order requiring rehiring of probationary employees at 6 federal departments, calls OPM acting chief failure to testify ‘violation of this court’s order.’ Doc: https://t.co/YbKxQGkwFg Earlier: https://t.co/OKSsElfZHw
— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) March 16, 2025
The White House responded to Judge Alsup’s order last week.
The Trump Administration immediately appealed his order.
“A single judge is attempting to unconstitutionally seize the power of hiring and firing from the Executive Branch. The President has the authority to exercise the power of the entire executive branch – singular district court judges cannot abuse the power of the entire judiciary to thwart the President’s agenda,” Karoline Leavitt said.
If a federal district court judge would like executive powers, they can try and run for President themselves. The Trump Administration will immediately fight back against this absurd and unconstitutional order,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/radical-clinton-judge-accuses-trump-admin-violating-his/
===============================================================
Newt Gingrich on Judicial Activism: This ‘Last Castle of Left-Wing Nutism’ is a ‘Fundamental Assault on the Constitutional Order’ (Video)
thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/newt-gingrich-judicial-activism-this-last-castle-left/
Mar. 16, 2025 1:40 pm
During President Donald Trump’s first days in office, radical activist left-wing judges are doing all they can to stop his efforts to help the American people.
So far this year, President Trump has faced 125 legal challenges in just two months.
On Saturday, a radical leftist judge attempted to disrupt the President’s mission to secure the border by issuing a temporary restraining order to block the Trump administration from deporting thousands of Venezuelan nationals, including dangerous gang members, under the Alien Enemies Act.
On Thursday, a federal judge ordered the Trump Administration to rehire approximately 20,000 probationary workers across 18 different agencies.
And the list goes on.
Historian and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich joined ‘Life, Liberty & Levin’ to discuss the concerning efforts by judges to negate President Trump’s agenda and usurp the American people who made their desires clear at the ballot box in November.
Mark Levin: It’s propitious that we have our friend, former speaker, Newt Gingrich, with us because he’s more than a former speaker. He’s a philosopher, he’s a historian, and he’s a thinker. And he’s written about in the past this whole issue of judicial tyranny.
Newt Gingrich, tyranny takes many forms, as you know. It can be a single dictator. It can be the tyranny of the legislature. It can be tyranny of the judiciary.
And I know our Democrat friends who are, in many respects, the party of tyranny.
They just want power, and they want it any way they can get it. And so they ran through these district court colonies when they have a majority because they’re radical, because they don’t respect separation of powers.
A few years back, you did a white paper on this. You had some very important, I think, ideas on how to rein in and out of control federal judiciary. Can you share some of that with us?
Newt Gingrich: Sure. I think you have to start with two realities from the revolutionary period. The first was that after no taxation without representation. Excuse me. The number one issue was judges. Jefferson and others clearly believed that the royalist judges were there to implement the will of the king not to provide justice. And so there was a very deep hostility to the idea of the judges being able to lord it over everyday folks.
And in fact, if you read the Federalist Papers, which are the primary introduction to what does the Constitution mean, they make it very clear.
They believe the legislative branch and the executive branch are much more powerful than the judicial for a practical reason. The Congress and the President together can simply abolish judges. It’s only with Marbury versus Madison, which is totally dishonest in how it’s currently portrayed.
In Marbury versus Jefferson, Marshall understands that if he doesn’t go down a very careful line, Jefferson will abolish the court. And so he has a very convoluted reasoning that he knows will make Jefferson relatively happy while asserting that the court can make this decision.
Lawyers ever since have dramatically expanded the meaning of Marbury v. Madison, and have ignored the reality that the judicial acts of 1801 and 1802 indicated total dominance of the legislative and executive branches over the courts because they can abolish them.
So you start from that background, and you realize that where we are today is that the last castle of left-wing nutism are these district judges and one or two Supreme Court judges, and that what they’re doing is a fundamental assault on the constitutional order.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/newt-gingrich-judicial-activism-this-last-castle-left/
Trump Administration Defiantly Tells Radical Judge to Pound Sand Following Controversial Ruling
thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/trump-administration-defiantly-tells-radical-judge-pound-sand/
Mar. 16, 2025 10:45 am
(Official State Department photo by Freddie Everett)
The Trump administration is refusing to back down after far-left DC District Judge James Boasberg, an Obama appointee, blocked the deportation of dangerous Venezuelan gang members, handing a lifeline to criminals instead of protecting American citizens.
Boasberg ordered an immediate halt on deportation flights of Tren de Aragua (TDA) gang members, who were being removed under the Alien Enemies Act (1798)—a wartime law explicitly designed to protect Americans from foreign threats.
Even more outrageous, the judge went so far as to demand that planes already in the air turn around and bring these violent criminals back into the United States.
According to ABC News, “[Boasberg] also ordered the Trump administration to immediately turn around two planes carrying noncitizens if they are covered by his order, including one [en route to El Salvador] that potentially took off during a break in the court’s hearing.”
“You shall inform your clients of this immediately any plane containing these folks that is going to take off or is in the air needs to be returned to the United States,” he said.
“However that’s accomplished, turning around the plane, or not embarking anyone on the plane…this is something that you need to make sure is complied with immediately.”
Boasberg, who serves as Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., appears to believe he has the authority to override the President of the United States and dictate immigration policy from the bench.
Despite Boasberg’s radical ruling, the Trump administration refused to comply with the unconstitutional order.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that hundreds of TDA gang members were successfully deported last night before the judge could interfere.
“We have sent 2 dangerous top MS-13 leaders plus 21 of its most wanted back to face justice in El Salvador,” said Rubio.
“Also, as promised by POTUS, we sent over 250 alien enemy members of Tren de Aragua which El Salvador has agreed to hold in their very good jails at a fair price that will also save our taxpayer dollars. President Nayib Bukele is not only the strongest security leader in our region, he’s also a great friend of the U.S. Thank you!”
We have sent 2 dangerous top MS-13 leaders plus 21 of its most wanted back to face justice in El Salvador. Also, as promised by @POTUS, we sent over 250 alien enemy members of Tren de Aragua which El Salvador has agreed to hold in their very good jails at a fair price that will…
— Secretary Marco Rubio (@SecRubio) March 16, 2025
Pam Bondi also released a statement, stating, “Tonight, a DC trial judge supported Tren de Aragua terrorists over the safety of Americans. TdA is represented by the ACLU. This order disregards well-established authority regarding President Trump’s power, and it puts the public and law enforcement at risk. The Department of Justice is undeterred in its efforts to work with the White House, the Department of Homeland Security, and all of our partners to stop this invasion and Make America Safe Again.”
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed in an interview with Maria Bartiromo that nearly 300 illegal immigrants will remain behind bars in El Salvador and will not be returned to America, despite the court’s ruling.
“The President signed a proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act against Tren de Aragua members who have invaded our country. These are the most violent, heinous criminal monsters you could ever imagine. They have taken the lives of innocent American women like Jocelyn Nungaray and Laken Riley. The President invoked this authority to deport nearly 300 of them, who are now in El Salvador, where they will be behind bars—where they belong—rather than roaming freely in American communities. This is a massive win for the American public, and it is going to save lives.”
WATCH:
.@PressSec: “@POTUS signed a proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act against Tren de Aragua members who have invaded our country … @POTUS invoked this authority to deport nearly 300 of them who are now in El Salvador, where they will be behind bars where they belong.” pic.twitter.com/LdPyvviBnV
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) March 16, 2025
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/trump-administration-defiantly-tells-radical-judge-pound-sand/
MUST READ: The Left’s Judicial Insurrection Against Trump Is a Constitutional Crisis — Here’s Why It Must Be Stopped
thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/must-read-lefts-judicial-insurrection-against-trump-is/
Mar. 16, 2025 8:00 am
Credit: The White House
Since returning to the White House in January, President Donald Trump has been met with an unprecedented legal onslaught from far-left activist judges and radical groups determined to sabotage his administration at every turn.
These rogue judges—many appointed by Clinton, Obama, and Biden—have launched a relentless legal coup to undermine the will of the American people and prevent Trump from carrying out his constitutional duties.
Appearing on The War Room with Steve Bannon, Josh Hammer, Senior Counsel for the Article III Project, warned that what America is witnessing is no ordinary judicial activism—it’s a full-blown judicial insurrection.
So far this year, President Trump has faced 125 legal challenges in just two months.
The full list of 125 legal challenges remains active and is documented on the Just Security website.
The Constitution and historical precedent are clear: activist judges have no authority to interfere with the President’s executive powers. The Supreme Court settled this issue in Mississippi v. Johnson (1867), ruling that courts cannot restrain the President from carrying out his executive duties.
Mississippi v. Johnson (1867) – Presidential Discretion is Not Subject to Judicial Interference
In 1867, when President Andrew Johnson was tasked with enforcing the Reconstruction Acts—despite personally opposing them—Mississippi sued, asking the Supreme Court to stop him.
The Court unanimously ruled against Mississippi, stating that a president’s executive duties are beyond the reach of the judiciary.
Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase, writing for the Court, distinguished between the president’s ministerial duties (which could be subject to judicial review) and executive/discretionary duties (which could not be interfered with by the courts).
Ministerial Duties (Subject to Judicial Review)
These are duties where the President (or an executive officer) has a clear legal obligation to perform a specific act in a prescribed manner, leaving no room for discretion. Courts can compel the performance of these duties through writs of mandamus.
Examples:
Issuing a Commission
In Marbury v. Madison (1803), Chief Justice Marshall held that delivering a judicial commission was a ministerial duty. The courts could compel an executive officer (like the Secretary of State) to perform this duty.
Processing a Pardon Application
Enforcing a Congressional Appropriation
Certifying Electoral Votes
Executive (Discretionary) Duties (Not Subject to Judicial Interference)
These are duties where the President has policy-based discretion, meaning courts cannot order or prohibit the exercise of such functions.
Examples:
Pardon Power
The President has absolute discretion to issue or deny a pardon under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution. Courts cannot force the President to grant a pardon.
Commander-in-Chief Decisions
The President’s military decisions, including troop deployments, orders to engage in combat, or withdrawal from treaties, are discretionary and not subject to judicial review.
Foreign Policy and Treaty Negotiations
The President has discretion over recognizing foreign governments (Zivotofsky v. Kerry), conducting diplomacy, and negotiating treaties. Courts cannot compel the President to engage in or alter diplomatic relations.
Executive Orders and Policy Prioritization
Decisions regarding enforcement priorities, such as prosecutorial discretion in immigration and national security (United States v. Texas)(United States ex rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy (1950)), are generally beyond judicial interference.
Appointments and Removals of Officials
The President has discretion over firing executive officers (Myers v. United States). Courts cannot force the President to retain or remove an official unless removal is statutorily restricted.
Based on Mississippi v. Johnson and Marbury v. Madison, courts can only interfere with ministerial duties—tasks that are strictly procedural and leave no room for discretion.
However, the cases against President Trump involve his executive and discretionary powers, which are off-limits to judicial interference.
Despite this clear legal precedent, activist judges continue violating the Constitution by ruling against President Trump’s executive authority. If the Supreme Court refuses to intervene, it risks setting a dangerous precedent where radical judges hold more power than the elected President.
The judicial branch was never meant to govern the nation—that responsibility belongs to the executive and legislative branches, which are accountable to the people.
The judicial coup against Trump is an unconstitutional power grab that must be stopped before it dismantles our republic.
According to White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, “Judges have no authority to administer the executive branch. Or to nullify the results of a national election. We either have democracy, or not.”
This is not just about Trump—it’s about protecting the Constitution, the Presidency, and the will of the American people. The Supreme Court must follow historical precedent and strike down these illegitimate cases. Anything less is a dereliction of duty.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/must-read-lefts-judicial-insurrection-against-trump-is/
Activist Judges and the Overreach of Judicial Authority: A Case for Sedition and Treason
thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/activist-judges-overreach-judicial-authority-case-sedition-treason/
Mar. 16, 2025 8:15 am
DC Judge Beryl Howell, a rank partisan and unhinged Trump-hater (Screenshot: United States Courts)
Guest post by Yaacov Apelbaum
Executive Summary
The balance of power among the three branches of government is a cornerstone of the United States Constitution.
However, activist judges have increasingly encroached upon executive authority, undermining the separation of powers.
When judges exceed their constitutional authority by obstructing or overturning executive actions without legitimate constitutional grounds, they not only overstep their role but may also commit acts tantamount to treason and sedition.
This essay explores the legal basis for holding such judges accountable, citing relevant laws, cases, and precedents.
The Constitutional Framework
Article II of the U.S. Constitution vests executive power in the President, granting him authority over the administration of federal agencies and the enforcement of laws.
Conversely, Article III establishes the judicial branch, limiting its role to interpreting the law rather than legislating or executing it. The principle of separation of powers is intended to prevent any branch from usurping the functions of another.
James Madison, in The Federalist Papers No. 47, emphasized that “the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands… may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” When judges attempt to override executive decisions outside their jurisdiction, they disrupt this balance and engage in judicial tyranny.
Activist Judges and the Undermining of Executive Authority
The term “activist judge” refers to those who decide cases based on personal political or ideological beliefs rather than strict adherence to constitutional principles. Such judges have, in recent history, issued rulings that directly contravene executive orders, often without sound legal justification. For example:
Trump v. Hawaii (2018): The Supreme Court ultimately upheld the executive order restricting travel from certain nations, emphasizing the President’s broad discretion in national security matters. However, lower courts had previously attempted to strike down the order based on partisan interpretations, exceeding their constitutional mandate.
Texas v. United States (2015): A federal judge blocked the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) program, highlighting the principle that executive actions must align with constitutional authority. Yet, numerous judicial interventions against executive policies have been politically motivated rather than legally sound.
When judges deliberately obstruct the execution of lawful presidential authority without valid constitutional grounds, they effectively engage in a form of insubordination against the executive branch.
Legal Grounds for Sedition and Treason
The U.S. legal system provides mechanisms to address such overreach, particularly under statutes concerning sedition and treason.
18 U.S.C. § 2384 – Seditious Conspiracy: This law states that “if two or more persons in any State or Territory… conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States… or oppose by force the authority thereof, they shall each be fined or imprisoned.” If activist judges intentionally obstruct executive functions and conspire to weaken presidential authority, they could be seen as engaging in seditious activities.
18 U.S.C. § 2381 – Treason: This statute defines treason as “levying war against [the United States], or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere.” If a judge collaborates with foreign or domestic entities to undermine national security-related executive decisions, they could be guilty of treason.
Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: This clause strictly defines treason but also implies that actions severely undermining the federal government’s operations could qualify if they involve aiding enemies or direct rebellion.
Precedents and Remedies
While judicial overreach is not new, historical responses to it vary. Some remedies include:
Impeachment: Federal judges serve for life “during good behavior” under Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution. However, Congress has the power to impeach judges who abuse their authority. Samuel Chase, a Supreme Court justice, was impeached in 1804 for allegedly allowing political bias to influence his rulings, demonstrating that judicial overreach can be addressed constitutionally.
Legislation to Rein in the Courts: Congress has authority under Article III to regulate the jurisdiction of federal courts. Legislation limiting judicial interference in executive matters could serve as a corrective measure against activist rulings.
Criminal Prosecution: In extreme cases where judicial actions constitute a clear conspiracy against the government, seditious conspiracy or even treason charges could be considered. However, such actions must meet high evidentiary standards.
The Judicial Coup Against Trump: How Activist Judges Are Undermining the Constitution and Aiding the Deep State
From the moment Donald Trump was sworn into office, a network of activist judges has worked tirelessly to obstruct his policies, undermine his authority, and interfere in the democratic process.
These judges, overwhelmingly appointed by Democratic presidents, have systematically weaponized the courts against a sitting president in what can only be described as an unconstitutional coup.
Their rulings go beyond legal interpretation and directly violate the Constitution’s principles of separation of powers, executive authority, and the rule of law.
How These Judges Are Violating the Constitution
I. Undermining the Executive Branch’s Authority
The U.S. Constitution grants the President broad powers over national security, foreign policy, and immigration under Article II. Yet, activist judges like Jon S. Tigar (Northern District of California) and Theodore D. Chuang (District of Maryland) have repeatedly blocked Trump’s lawful immigration policies, preventing him from securing America’s borders.
Tigar issued nationwide injunctions against asylum restrictions, while Chuang ruled against Trump’s travel ban despite the Supreme Court ultimately upholding it.
II. Legislating from the Bench
The role of the judiciary is to interpret the law, not create new policies. Yet, judges like (D.C. District Court) and James E. Boasberg have handed down politically motivated rulings designed to push a leftist agenda.
Howell, for example, declared unconstitutional an executive order targeting the Paul, Weiss law firm, effectively protecting legal elites tied to anti-Trump operations.
III. Blocking Trump’s Attempts to Drain the Swamp
Trending: BREAKING: Obama Judge Orders Trump Admin to Turn Around Planes Deporting Venezuelan Gang Members
When Trump attempted to fire corrupt government employees entrenched in the bureaucracy, activist judges like William Alsup (Northern District of California) and James Bredar (District of Maryland) stepped in to block the mass layoffs.
Their rulings forced the federal government to reinstate employees whose terminations were part of Trump’s efforts to cut waste and remove deep state operatives.
IV. Shielding the Deep State from Accountability
Judge Carl J. Nichols (D.C. District Court) blocked Trump’s attempt to place USAID employees on administrative leave and recall foreign-based workers.
This move directly protected bureaucrats who had been pushing anti- Trump foreign policy behind the scenes.
V. Interfering in Elections and Political Processes
Judges have weaponized the legal system to prevent Trump from governing and running for re-election.
Judge Arthur Engoron (New York) has led a politically driven civil fraud case against Trump’s businesses, clearly designed to cripple his financial and political power.
Judge Juan Merchan (New York) is overseeing Trump’s so-called “hush money” trial, which was widely seen as a bogus attempt to keep him off the campaign trail.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/activist-judges-overreach-judicial-authority-case-sedition-treason/
Rep. Brandon Gill Moves to Impeach Obama Judge James Boasberg for Blocking Trump’s Use of Alien Enemies Act
thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/rep-brandon-gill-moves-impeach-obama-judge-james/
Mar. 16, 2025 12:20 pm
Credit: Wikimedia Common
Representative Brandon Gill (R-TX) announced plans to file articles of impeachment against U.S. District Judge James Boasberg.
This action comes in response to Judge Boasberg’s recent decision to temporarily block President Donald Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, aimed at expediting the deportation of members of the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua.
U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, an Obama-appointed radical judge, has single-handedly derailed President Trump’s efforts to remove violent Venezuelan gang members from American soil.
On Saturday, President Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act, a seldom-used wartime law, to address the pressing threat posed by Tren de Aragua, a violent Venezuelan gang designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.
The administration’s objective was to swiftly deport gang members infiltrating the United States without adhering to the prolonged procedures typically associated with criminal and immigration proceedings. This decisive action was intended to protect American communities from the gang’s criminal activities.
However, Judge Boasberg issued a 14-day temporary restraining order, effectively halting the administration’s efforts and mandating that any deportation flights already in progress return to the United States.
Enter Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas), a patriot who’s had enough of activist judges undermining our sovereignty, announced he’s taking action.
“I’ll be filing Articles of Impeachment against activist judge James Boasberg this week,” he wrote.
I’ll be filing Articles of Impeachment against activist judge James Boasberg this week. pic.twitter.com/kh4vfooS2A
— Congressman Brandon Gill (@RepBrandonGill) March 16, 2025
Conservative leaders and lawmakers quickly rallied behind Gill’s effort, condemning Boasberg’s radical ruling and calling for his removal.
Elon Musk responded to the news, simply stating: “Necessary.”
Necessary https://t.co/akDxJ2rOKW
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 16, 2025
Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) simply wrote: “Support.”
Support. https://t.co/OxFiSq69Ve
— Rep. Eli Crane (@RepEliCrane) March 16, 2025
Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA) also threw his weight behind the effort, stating: “Let’s go, Rep. Brandon Gill! I fully support your efforts, and I’m glad to have you in the fight to impeach activist judges.”
Let’s go, @RepBrandonGill!
I fully support your efforts, and I’m glad to have you in the fight to impeach activist judges. https://t.co/AcvdFA2laM
— Rep. Andrew Clyde (@Rep_Clyde) March 16, 2025
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/rep-brandon-gill-moves-impeach-obama-judge-james/
===============================================================
AG Pam Bondi Files Emergency Motion with DC Circuit to Halt ‘Illegal Order’ by Obama-Appointed Judge Jeb Boasberg, Alleging Sabotage of Presidency
thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/ag-pam-bondi-files-emergency-motion-dc-circuit/
Mar. 16, 2025 11:45 am
Attorney General Pam Bondi; Judge James E. Boasberg (Wikimedia Common)
Attorney General Pam Bondi has unleashed a blistering emergency motion with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, demanding an immediate stay of an “outrageous overreach” by Obama-appointed District Judge James E. “Jeb” Boasberg.
The motion, filed early Saturday morning, accuses Boasberg of sabotaging the Trump administration’s national security agenda by issuing an “unauthorized” Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that blocks the removal of dangerous illegal aliens tied to the notorious Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA)—a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO).
The explosive filing accuses Boasberg of acting without jurisdiction, without evidence, and without even hearing from the government—rushing to issue a 14-day TRO just hours after five anonymous Venezuelan plaintiffs filed a class-action complaint.
These plaintiffs, detained in Texas, claim they fear being wrongly swept up in Trump’s rumored plan to invoke the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to expel TdA members.
Their lawsuit, J.G.G. v. Trump, seeks to upend Trump’s lawful enforcement of immigration laws, arguing that invoking the Alien Enemies Act—a wartime measure historically used to remove hostile foreign nationals—is somehow “unprecedented” and “unlawful” during “peacetime.”
According to the government’s filing, Tren de Aragua is a transnational gang with deep ties to Venezuela’s socialist regime, operating as a de facto paramilitary force conducting criminal operations across the United States.
The gang’s members have been linked to violent crimes, human trafficking, and drug smuggling, prompting the Trump administration to invoke the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to facilitate their swift removal.
The motion reviewed by The Gateway Pundit states:
The Maduro regime coordinates with and relies on TdA to “sow violence and discord throughout the United States,” including through gang-related crimes and violent attacks such as the murder of Laken Riley in Georgia in February 2024.
Given how significantly TdA has become intertwined in the fabric of Venezuela’s state structures, it is a de facto arm of the Maduro regime. In such a case, TdA becomes indistinguishable from Venezuela, and the two may be folded together for purposes of invoking Section 21.
As an independent rationale, TdA also operates as a de facto government in the areas in which it is operating. It is well known that the Maduro regime is closely linked to narco-terrorism; a major component of that is “corrupt[ing] the institutions of Venezuela” to flood the United States with drugs “to undermine . . . the wellbeing of our nation” and that Maduro “deliberately deploy[s] cocaine as a weapon.”
In those areas where it is operating, TdA is in fact operating as a criminal state, independent or in place of the normal civil society and government.Given its governance and organizational structure, as well as its de facto control over parts of Venezuela in which it operates with impunity as an effective state unto itself, it would be well within the discretion of the President to determine it constitutes a foreign “government” for purposes of invoking Section 21.
Second, TdA is clearly perpetrating an invasion or a predatory incursion into the United States. Although the definition of “invasion” most easily applies to a militaryentry and occupation of a country, the accepted definition of that term is far broader.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/ag-pam-bondi-files-emergency-motion-dc-circuit/
51st Staters: Canadians Who Want To Be Part of the US Are Swearing Allegiance to America (VIDEO)
thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/51st-staters-canadians-who-want-be-part-us/
Mar. 16, 2025 8:45 am
Because the US is tired of subsidizing the Canadian economy while also guaranteeing their security, President Donald J. Trump has floated the shockingly unexpected idea of annexing Canada as ‘the 51st state’.
The idea fell like a bomb in the great white north, and in a first poll, more than 10% of the population is already behind it.
In some Canadian provinces like Alberta, the idea is gaining ground. Bison farmer Don Casselman worries that Canada is doomed and, if Alberta is to save itself, it must break away and become a US state.
After all, with just 63,000 military troops to defend over 10 million km2, it is powerless against incursions by Russia or China.
The Telegraph reported:
“The answer, to Mr Casselman, was obvious. ‘I want President Trump to come and visit us’, he said, referring to the bison ranch-turned-separatist hub that stretched out over the fields into the distance. Perhaps a plan could be hashed out with Danielle Smith, Alberta’s conservative premier, for the absorption of Alberta into the United States. ‘I want my children to understand what it means to be free’.”
Trudeau had to take the ‘threat’ of US annexation seriously.
Initially, most people imagined that Trump’s idea was nothing but a good old-fashioned troll, but ‘Governor’ Trudeau soon learnt to take the ‘threat’ seriously.
The secessionist provinces like Alberta and Saskatchewan make up almost exactly 10 per cent of the country that was polled to be favorable to the 51st state idea.
If these provinces make a concerted effort to leave, it could ‘unravel the basis of the Canadian state.’.
“’I’m thinking of moving with my family to the US’, sighed Chris Hunter, a 40-year-old oil worker, over a pint of beer at the [Edmonton] bar. […] While Mr. Hunter was not an active supporter of secession, he said he would reconsider his decision to leave Alberta if Mr. Trump took over. ‘He’s a businessman’, Mr. Hunter said, ‘and so am I’.”
Outdoor sign supporting Albert’s annexation by the US.
“Over a lunch of hot dogs, the separatists shared the beliefs that had steeled them to face public derision. Some mentioned vaccine mandates imposed by the federal government, others the harsh treatment of the 2022 ‘Freedom Convoy’ trucker protest, which snaked from Alberta to the capital.”
Albertan citizen James Goransrud talked about the imposition of a carbon tax: “It’s taxation without representation, and historically that’s a problem, right?”
Others complain that Alberta is ‘better at killing patients than treating them’, following the and wide popularization legalization of ‘assisted suicide’ (a.k.a. euthanasia).
“’All we’re doing is saying we want this, yeah, we accept President Trump’s offer’, [oil worker Peter] Downing said, while 18-wheeler trucks roared past on the snow-fringed highway outside the window. ‘We want lower taxes. And we want to never pay another dime to Ottawa through ‘equalization.” […] Moreover, if Mr Trump took power, ‘Drill, Baby, Drill’ would remove the shackles from Alberta’s oil industry.”
https://youtu.be/A6oFmnAw6DM
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/51st-staters-canadians-who-want-be-part-us/
Post
Conversation
Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
@dom_lucre
??BREAKING: A bartender at Chatterbox bar in Indianapolis threatened a Trump supporter with a bat and kicked her out the bar after they spotted her MAGA hat, another woman can be heard telling the victim she wasn’t welcome and when the Trump supporter pointed out that this was clear discrimination the bar can be heard laughing at her.
https://x.com/i/status/1901109722658312525
https://x.com/dom_lucre/status/1901109722658312525