It’s been an uncomfortable day, with a lot of people who have done extraordinary work hurling Molotov Cocktails at each other. Some of the giants in the fight for a republic style government are about to gp to an internal war, and already, the first casualty of that war is truth.
As I have no idea what the truth is at the moment, I won’t offer an opinion, or present some of the materials that have been launched into the public information sphere which will initiate the war. It will do damage no matter what the truth of the situation is.
1. Tucker Carlson speaks to the release of Julian Assange while giving a speech in Australia. Most of this is truly excellent, although nearly none of it is about Assange
2. The same man who brought Canada M-103, the attempt to basically criminalize any criticism of Islam as an ideology, refuses to act on the new head of the Human Rights Commission who apparently has some fairly clear and problematic opinions on Jews and Israel. Anyone who is surprised, hasn’t been paying attention to how these institutions actually are, as opposed to how they are named. Just think ‘Health Canada’. or Statistics Canada, which now celebrates massive increases in population rather than informing policy by accurately and dryly reporting facts. Or the United Nations, one of my favorite candidates for ironic names. In any case, read Poilievre’s tweet and letter. Like the United nations, the Human Rights Commission would do infinitely more to assist in Human Rights if it did not exist at all. But that last point would be to utterly ignore the important factor. The Human
3. True North interviews Tommy Robinson post his arrest. One wonders if at least one of the motives could be to stop him from speaking across Canada, and possibly to stop him from attending his own massive planned rally in the UK in July. And for anyone who thinks this isn’t something the UK or Canada would do, how long was Assange in jail for with no trial? For those already aware of the allegations by an Ottawa activist, cut right to 23:25 to see Tommy address them. This is all very destructive.
4. Steve Kirsch: “We cannot find any Autistic children among the unvaccinated”. Although we hear this claim on a kind of street level, like most truth, as well as anti-truth travels these days, it is nice to hear it quantified. And thank God for the Amish. Without them we would have no control group. Like those who did not take the mRNA shots, these people give us a data set without which we would likely never be able to nail down major health problems as a consequence of these medical interventions. One may notice that increasingly, and starting usually with CNN, artificial sweeteners are being blamed for an increase in the exact medical problems that the mRNA/DNA shots cause. If that was true, isn’t it curious that Metamucil, which claims on the bottle if you get the unsweetened one, to have no added sweetners, but if you read the ingredients actually has some wierd crap in it that has a higher glycemic index than sugar itself, yes, over 100, does not get an honourable mention on CNN or has ever been busted by the MSM.
Let me go over that again..
A product widely used by diabetics and elderly people, and people who avoid sugar because of its effects on the pancreas, claims to have no sweeteners added:
But then if we look at the list of ingredients…
Woh what’s that under NON_MEDICINAL INGREDIENT:? Maltodextrin?
The CNN article has an Interesting choice of sweeteners and the conspicuous omission of Maltodextrin I thought. Read it for yourself.
Now we do understand that corelation is not causation except when it comes to Global Warming, then all corelation is causation and every data point proves the model.
This was a long and seemingly meandering way to get to the Steve Kirsch video on Autism and childhood vaccines. But it goes to the extent to which media is captured, and which you can easily go to your local drugstore and check it out for yourself by reading a jar of no sweetener added Metamucil. And may allow us to suspend our deeply held belief that the state would just never do that. Regulatory bodies do what they say they do. An exception doesn’t break the rule.
Once upon a time those things may have been true. Now though?
5. Daniel Greenfield is an intellect on a strata all of its own. He has been writing brilliantly about Islam and its interactions with Western Civilization for as long as I can remember. Possibly longer than this site has. He used to write for his own site, Sultan Knish, as well as for David Horowitz I believe. This is his article on the attack on Jewish people and institutions in Las Angeles a few days ago.
What I Saw At A Terrorist Rally Outside A Synagogue
Thirty minutes after Hamas supporters first set up their operation outside a Los Angeles synagogue, they maced their first Jew. And the Los Angeles police did nothing.
Not until an hour into the terrorist rally outside a synagogue, did the LAPD finally step in, pushing back masked Jihad supporters in keffiyeh terror scarves from the entrance of Congregation Adas Torah (Congregation of the Bible) which they had occupied.
And then the mob, chanting calls for “intifada” and the destruction of Israel, moved outward to target two smaller synagogues attended by Persian Jewish refugees from Islamic terror in Iran.
“Billions of us will come and kill you,” a heavily accented Middle Eastern man in a keffiyeh unprompted rasped at me as I walked up. Only dozens had actually shown up, but they made up for it with bullhorns, robotic chants, and assaults in the middle of a Jewish neighborhood.
The Jewish counterprotesters had come waving American and Israeli flags while the other side was a sea of terrorist flags. A man wore an Antifa cap, another had come in ski goggles during 90-degree heat, while others toted bear spray, metal bottles, and other implements of violence.
Please click through to read the rest at Daniel’s site
Thank you all for checking out this site and its views on events.



– ITEM 4 – Why is it impossible to find a non-alcoholic beverage that doesn’t have a sugary taste? I don’t understand this. –
SUCRALOSE, a very common added sweetener in so many products we ingest. These products boast of ‘No added sugar’.
A study from researchers at North Carolina State University suggests that a chemical formed from one artificial sweeteners might also damage our DNA.
The zero-calorie sweetener in question is sucralose, which is about 600 times sweeter than table sugarTrusted Source,
The World Health Organization (WHO) recently recommended against using certain sugar substitutes to help lose weight, saying there is little evidence of long-term benefit.
Sucralose, known in the United States by the brand name Splenda, is used in thousands of products, including baked goods, beverages, chewing gum, gelatins and frozen dairy desserts.
In addition to DNA damage, the new study found that sucralose may lead to a leaky gut lining, and increase the activity of genes related to inflammation and cancer.
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/sucralose-a-common-artificial-sweetener-may-increase-cancer-risk
#5 Wth is going on? I expect somewhing this in western europe, but in Los Angeles? Is the US that far gone?
And american police has a reputation for being heavy-handed, but in case of such rallies, they never seem to intervene.