1. University of Toronto protest has moved squarely into Nazi territory
WATCH “Heil Hitler!” on the Univ. of Toronto pro-Hamas encampment
Making this Trans-flag puzzle a little clearer perhaps in the minds of those who do not understand the mass line nature of the trans-movement.
2. I will try and find this whole segment on LLTT, but meanwhile this segmenbt is worth watching. If you know any medical professionals, a doctor at least and ideally a cardiologist or a radiological pathologist, have them check Dr. Shoemaker’s explanation for veracity. His claim here is far too important to let it go either as true or untrue without some kind of checking. I will ask a few myself, and might chase down Chris Shoemaker for an interview on this myself.
Complete text:
A COVID-“vaccinated” heart is “a heart that is working…twice as hard as it should…and it does it for 6 continuous month[s] after two vaccinations…These people…weren’t having chest pain…weren’t having a sense of myocarditis, they think that everything’s just fine…” Canadian Comprehensive Physician Dr. Chris Shoemaker (
) describes for Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson (
the results of a study performed by Dr. Nakahara Takehiro, et al. at the Keio University School of Medicine in Japan, which found that COVID-“vaccinated” hearts work “twice as hard as [they] should” for “six continuous months” following injection. Shoemaker specifically shows how COVID-“vaccinated” hearts are appearing “blackened” on PET scans, meaning they’re experiencing an anomalously high uptake of glucose. The authors of the study “couldn’t understand, ‘Well, why is the heart showing up black on our studies? The heart never has strange or extra glucose uptake,” Shoemaker tells Tyler Thompson. The physician notes how PET (or positron emission tomography) scans of “unvaccinated people” in the images to the left of what’s displayed (graphics taken from the study) show “soft, gray” hearts. Conversely, in PET scans of “vaccinated” people on the right, the hearts are “blackened out.” The two specific hearts shown in the images, Shoemaker notes, were in two individuals that had a “high-level doubling of the amount of effort” they put out. In one of the hearts, there was 100% elevation and effort. On average, “vaccinated” people had hearts that were working 50 to 60% harder than normal. All 700 of the COVID-“vaccinated” people in the study had some level of elevated cardiac effort. “The dark redness, or the dark blackness, that is a heart that is working…twice as hard as it should…and it does it for six continuous month[s] after two vaccinations,” Shoemaker says, referring to the COVID-“vaccinated” hearts shown in the presented study excerpt. The physician goes on to note, “These people, by the way…were feeling perfectly well. They weren’t having chest pain, they weren’t having a sense of myocarditis, they think that everything’s just fine, they’re an athlete, they’re a child, they think everything’s fine…” Along with this study performed in Tokyo, Shoemaker notes its results have been replicated at three other medical hubs, including a hospital system in Houston, Texas, as well as Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City and Oxford University in England.
Listening to Dr. Shoemaker above, a doctor by the way, who gave up everything to try and warn us all about these shots, and too late for himself to not take them, one begins to suspect that the lukewarm warnings by high profile people recently admitting that there may be some serious side effects from this otherwise safe and effective medication, is really just staying in front of the narrative attack. So people can admit that there are issues, like there may be with any new medication, but still they were in toto the right thing to do. Or something like that. Any doctors past or present who read this site please feel free to offer an opinion on Dr. Shoemaker’s explanation of these studies.
UPDATE: Full episode:
“My son is a hero, he made me proud” – She said during an interview shortly after her son carried out the terrorist attack as part of Jihad (Islam’s Holy War) for the sake of Allah.
On 30 June 2016, the Palestinian terrorist Muhammad Taraireh broke into a Jewish home and targeted 13-year-old Israeli-American citizen, Hallel Yaffa Ariel. After he stabbed her dozens of times, he went outside to find another Jewish victim.
Eventually, he was killed when he tried to stab Israeli security guards who in response shot and neutralized him.
The Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas’ party posted the terrorist’s picture on its official Facebook page, declaring him a martyr/hero (Shahid) for killing Jews in the name of Islam.
4. The following video has Jordan Peterson discussing the threat of MAiD especially to teen girls. This could be a data point in Stephen Coughlin’s thesis on the Marxist War on Women.
Here is a post with several speeches on Parliament Hill against Trudeau’s MAiD program with details about how awful the method for killing people actually is.
5. Stories like this were far, far too common during the Covid years. We posted a lot at Vlad. Now we are at the law suit phase. There will be more to say about it. But for those who died, or were crippled or injured by shots that don’t work, they didn’t need and they were tricked into wanting, or forced to take ones they didn’t want. NO AMOUNT OF MONEY could ever satisfy that injustice. One of the reasons for punishment in the legal system, is, bluntly put, revenge. Another is deterrent. As governments invent money and suffer none whatsoever for losing a law suit, neither deterrence nor punishment is met by winning money from the state. The third reason for punishment, like jail, is to sequester the offender from the public for the sake of the public. ALL THREE OF THESE must be meted upon the people who lied and denied and coerced through the Covid flu season and the authoritarian measures and poison injections they foisted on us.
Court Lets Lawsuit Over Refusal To Give Dying Woman Ivermectin Proceed
A court has rejected a hospital system’s claim that its refusal to continue giving ivermectin to a dying woman was covered by federal law, stating that the law does not apply to the actions in question.
Mount Sinai South Nassau in New York City was twice forced to give COVID-19 patient Deborah Bucko, who was close to death after the system’s normal treatment failed, ivermectin under court order. Mrs. Bucko’s condition improved after she began taking ivermectin.
However, the system stopped the second round of treatment before the prescription ended, and Mrs. Bucko then died.
After being sued, Mount Sinai said the lawsuit should be thrown out because it’s immune under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act), which covers health care workers administering drugs and vaccines during a health emergency, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
“There is no refuting that the complaint is a frontal attack on the use of COVID-19 countermeasures as defined by the PREP Act,” lawyers for the hospital system said in a filing. “The complaint expressly implicates conduct encompassed by the PREP Act by alleging a claim for loss that has a causal relationship with the dispensing and administration of covered countermeasures to treat COVID-19. As such, the law requires its dismissal.”
The act has been successfully invoked in a range of COVID-19-related cases. Workers who injected a child with a COVID-19 vaccine without parental consent, for instance, recently won the dismissal of a lawsuit by citing the law.
The motion to dismiss by Mount Sinai, though, was rejected by New York Supreme Court Justice Randy Sue Marber.
Justice Marber wrote in a May 17 order that Mount Sinai, its workers, and ivermectin, fit under the definitions of “covered person” and “covered countermeasure” under the law. But the suit against the system does not bring a claim relating to the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19, she said.
“Rather, in stunning contrast to South Nassau’s assertions, the complaint alleges, with particularity, that South Nassau ‘acted wrongfully and negligently, by repeatedly refusing to administer ivermectin to … [the decedent]’ notwithstanding it ‘having been prescribed” … and ’despite clear evidence in the medical records that … [the decedent’s] condition showed significant improvement once the ivermectin treatment was initiated,’” the justice said, quoting from the complaint.
That means the immunity conferred by PREP “is inapplicable,” she added later.
Thank you all for checking out this site
There are rumours circulating that the Fico attempted assassination attempt was not in fact a lone wolf, disgruntled lefty but was part of an organized agency. This link is to one of those rumours.
