First, a follow up video to Dr. K Vs The CHICOMS. If you listen to the part he asks about, yeah it does sound a little like the woman is saying “shoot” as part of her sentence yeah.
1. Mark Levin: Slavery practiced in America on the Southern border now, and media supports it with its silence
2. Here is a fun one WEF admits the owned the news but people question it too much now thanks to social media.
No worries for them though. They still own FaceBook and control Twitter to a large degree. No one can have that much exposure as Elon does, and not be susceptible to threats by capable organizations or people. I think some of why Twitter is not as free as Elon promised it would be is because of this. As the old saying goes, ‘if I owe you 1000.00$ I am in trouble. If I owe you 100,000,000.00$ YOU are in trouble.’. As for the other platforms, chances are the COMINTERN has some control, even if its just through the dialectically operated hate-speech laws now ubiquitous in the West.
Meanwhile, the EU/WEF wants to have more control over what facts are.
She is right about the information war though. Just being incomplete in terms of who is waging it and against whom exactly.
Here is a 45 minute video from the WEF on “defending Truth”. One can bet though that the real discussion was on subverting truth and those meetings were not filmed and are not available to see. If anyone has the intestinal fortitude to watch all this and comment on it and draw our attention to specific parts, it would be great for the readership and thank you in advance.
3. Someone finally tracked the illegal migrant wave from source to Southern Border. And guess who is behind it! Hint: Don’t play piano near them.
4. Thousands of Votes in 2020 Election Misreported, Virginia Officials Say
So why bother posting anything about how the vaxx is bad for people, that the various state agencies knew they were lying when they foisted so many things on us all, or more and more proof that the election, (frankly anyone you want to select in the past few years) was cheated or that the people protesting government tyranny on any of these things was not an insurrection. Why because what it is we need to understand isn’t that they were wrong, they know they lied. And you cannot change a person’s intentions by pointing out that they lied to achieve them. This is most easily evident with the Global Warming line of attack against Western Civ. They know they are lying. Showing science or hypocrisy on their part does nothing. The MOST you can achieve by using truth to defeat a lie, is when enough people know its a lie and become recalcitrant to the agenda, they may have to change tactics. meaning change the lie. Or perhaps just apply more force. Most likely both as we have actually seen with our own eyes in the past 4 years.
Tell people the state has ordered their lives, personal and commercial to shut down for 2 weeks, which becomes 2 years, and if people rebel because they know the reasons are lies, the state comes in with a lot of force to make sure you obey and that the reasons to obey are not to be questioned because that isn’t the point. Just ask that poor schmo with the BBQ in Toronto. For those that don’t remember, here are a couple of reminders of how that looks. An interview with Michael Arana, who was so abused by the state, his family asked him not to even discuss it publicly. And of course, Rebel Media’s clip on what the police, I think it was the Toronto Police, did to a BBQ joint that kept on serving food to people when only Costco was allowed to do that.
Adam is just one example but an easy one to understand. He was correct on the science and the health. But he disobeyed an order by the state who knew it was lying about the science and the health. Anyone doubt that? Read Fisman’s Fraud by R.N. Watteel. For those that don’t know, Fisman is Canada’s carbon-paper copy of the UK’s Neil Ferguson. A paid liar who creates apocalypse scenarios the COMINTERN can use to crush us all at any time for reasons we are not to say out lout.
So why keep posting proof that they are lying when all the institutions of state, who’s purpose is to make sure that public policy should conform to truth and rule of law, have been captured by the COMINTERN and in fact now operate as agents of oppression?
Because whatever ways there are out of this requires people to understand what really happened, and what really is true in part. Another part is that they do not in any way expect state agencies to restore justice. They know have redefined justice to mean communism in exactly the same way Lenin redefined democracy to mean communism. Something like, ‘The only system that reflects the interests of the entire public is communism. Therefore, communism is the only real form of democracy’. Paraphrasing. Lenin called his party the Social Democrat party. The US communists who run the Democrat party are called the Democrat Socialist party. A nod to Lenin. (DSA)
So we have to know what is true, we have to know they also know what is true, and that they are lying, and we have to create our own institutions which operate on the basis of Socratic principles. We have to preserve our own past and ideally get old books in print and hide them. They WILL be coming for them. The proof of that is instructions in schools now to get rid of all books prior to a certain recent date for lack of DEI. In other words, a full Winston Smithing of our collective knowledge base.
‘There are none so blind as those who will not see. The most deluded people are those who choose to ignore what they already know’.’ (Variant of Jeremiah 5:21)
While it is difficult to get people to accept a truth when they have invested in the lie, and those that took the shots, and especially those who coerced their loved ones, especially Children to take the shots, to accept that they were misled, it is not impossible. And meanwhile, if there is to be conflict between those who wish to restore individual rights and rule of law and those who would take it all away in the name of a Hitlerian form of altruism, then we need everyone on our side possible with as wide and varied a skill set as we can muster. Simply knowing the truth isn’t enough. As Mark Twain said, “A lie can go around the world before the truth can tie up its shoes”. He said that before the internet. Now of course that is literally true.
Virginia election officials say that thousands of votes were misreported in Prince William County during the 2020 presidential election.
President Joe Biden, initially reported to have received 142,863 votes in the county, actually received about 1,650 more, officials said in a recent statement.
Then-President Donald Trump was said to have received 81,222 votes but received about 2,320 fewer than reported.
Michele White, the county’s top election official during the 2020 contest, was charged in 2023 with altering election results, although two charges were later dropped.“Election results were improperly reported by the previous administration during the 2020 election. Our office reported this issue to the Virginia Department of Elections and voluntarily cooperated with the attorney general’s office,” Eric Olsen, the current county director of elections, said in a statement.
Oh yeah and then there is this:
Bridgeport is not only the largest city in Connecticut, but also, it’s become something akin to the national poster-child of ballot fraud.
In fact, in their most recent election, a whistleblower came forward and exposed video surveillance footage, showing how hundreds of ballots were inserted into the ballot drop boxes ahead of election day.The video evidence was so egregious, that it forced a local judge to completely overturn the results, and order that a new election be held.But that is, frankly, just the tip of the iceberg.
And so, in order to get to the bottom of what’s been happening in Bridgeport, our team went out to speak with Mr. John Gomes, the candidate for mayor who was found (by the judge) to have been a victim of election fraud. And what him and his team revealed to us was shocking.
5. Yesterday we posted an item on how the Habermas dialectical tactic of ‘consensus’ and opposing it as ‘hate speech’ was now being applied to the Global Warming line of attack against Western Civ. (See item 4 here please) In fact it has been applied since the beginning and we know that from the frequency and use of the dialectical term, ‘Climate Denier’. An attempt to link objecting to the scientism of Global warming narratives to denying the reality of the Nazi Holocaust. Fuel has now been added to this Line of effort against us. Check out this insane CBC interview with some fellow who claims to be representing an organization against digital hate. So now, they have linked climate science that opposes narratives, with hate speech. In order that no one should have to go to the orignal CBC link and thusly have to have a shaman come over to cast a blessing on your computer and wave burning Sage around afterwards, we have taken the full audio of this interview and put it to some graphics that better reflect the nature of the CBC as an entity.
Also note that at no time would the CBC ever conduct such a rational and fair interview with say, Tom Harris, or co-founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore.
In the interview below, the CBC in the lightest of ways mentions some of the objections we may have to climate narratives and allows their hate-speech, Frankfurt School style interviewee to respond in full and measures ways. But we know what they do to people who are counter-narrative don’t we?
By way of decryption, it helps to understand how CBC and the COMINTERN use certain terms.
When they say, “far right” they are expecting people to link whatever their target is with Nazis. Who of course are far left. It takes less than 30 seconds to get anyone to agree that is the case, or at worst, sit back in stunned silence unable to counter the massive obvious fraud that Nazis are right wing. But they do use it internally with meaning. “far right” to the CBC means anyone who believes in the restoration or preservation of individual rights, the existence of the nation-state, ownership of any kind of private property, especially land and mostly, those who oppose the communist revolution which now runs North America at the very least.
Understanding that the metic in play is revolutionaries, (IOW communists) Vs. counter-revolutionaries and most leftist language such as racist, misogynist, Islamophobe etc. refers to them, makes everything much clearer.
I must say the way the Chinese man shouted “Don’t touch her” in the first video was surprising in its ferocity, as was the dark way he warned the piano player, so who knows? Maybe there really is something more sinister about these CCP tourists than meets the eye. And don’t forget, They. Are. Everywhere.