1. So who does the WHO pick to create guidelines for CHILD mutilation and sterilization procedures?
2. Meanwhile, at Harvard, a real scientist speaks out on the same issues. Well, the other side of the trans dialectic
3. Anything sacred to us, any symbol of who we are and what we believe, will be attacked by the left-Islam alliance. Intersectionality.
4. Harvard Student on Gay is good, but way wrong. The answer is never more hate speech laws. Its the elimination of them altogether. If Hate Speech laws worked, they would be working now, as we have tons of them. They are a dialectic tool to advance a communist agenda. They will always be selectively enforced for whatever group advances the revolution, or in other words, the destruction of the West. After all, that is what the Revolution is. And nothing more. Hate Speech laws are like gun control zones. They just tell the shooters where the vulnerable are. Communists see Jews as quintessentially middle class. Or if that seems too 20th century for you, as holding an unfair share of power in society. Which is the same thing but repackaged for antisemites that want to believe they aren’t really antisemites.
The 1st amendment in the US already allows for criminal charges where a statement of hatred contains immediacy. This means that if you say out of anger, “I flipping HATE those Martians and want to kill them!” It’s legal. If you say tomorrow at 2:00 at the corner of Jupiter and Neptune, now its conspiracy to murder and is a crime. That is about as good as free speech laws can possibly get. We have to return to that. Not pretend we can ‘fix’ hate speech laws to include Jews. That is layering a problem on a problem and can’t work because hate speech laws were never intended to work. If telling a morbidly obese person that they are unhealthy because of it is a hate crime, then hate speech laws are not about protecting anyone.
Parenthetically, I wonder if cigarette smokers can try and tap into that bit of ludicrousness. Cigarettes can cause cancer, could be considered a hate-fact directed at a vulnerable minority. Vulnerable cause you know, they may get cancer from cigarettes.
5. Jimmy Dore explains scientism without saying scientism
Thank you all for checking out this site.
Mark Levin has a few things to say about the Democrat Party, and as usual, he puts it in a historical context which is excellently done, and worth watching even if just for that.
Levin is no friend of the Constitution. Dont be fooled by his sweet sounds as hes for modifying the founding documents and keeping the lettered agencies. Thats an enemy of the people folks, do your research!
I’m with you, R.