This appears to be the film in question. CAVEAT: We have not watched it yet. But it isn’t difficult to believe the media is a weapon for the state and the left in the UK as it is in Canada. So how wrong can the movie be.
“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
I keep trying to subscribe, but I cannot post
How can I even like the posts I get from Vlad Tepes?
Just do what you’re doing and say your piece, Evelyn. Welcome.
^^Evelyn^^,
What Johnny said!
Some unsolicited advice: When you encounter material like this, back it up as soon as possible. The powers that be love to take down this sort of material if they can.
btw, here’s the direct bitchute link. To my knowledge, they have a decent reputation for keeping material up. Nevertheless, once burnt, twice shy. I have a copy on my HD.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qWFZ1GeUPdw5/
Figured as much. Western society is ruled by the amoral, unethical and unprincipled.
I received a letter from my MP recently. I think I will send it back or drop it off in person to ‘discuss’ why his office has ignored my pleas for over a year and multiple attempts at contact for assistance on a disability claim with records from my military service file. He is a Conservative in Canada, perhaps they only pretend to be supportive of conservative values. Perhaps the whole office was too busy virtue signalling and clapping for the Waffen SS.
substitute in J6 and all the J6 prisoners in the place of Tommy. Same thing. Politicians, law enforcement, Media, Hollywood all had a narrative, and they are sticking to it. Truth be damned.
Meanwhile, the defence had argued Veltman was not guilty of first-degree murder, nor did he commit an act of terrorism, because he didn’t have criminal intent to kill the victims and didn’t deliberate and plan the attack.
Hicks said Veltman suffered from several mental disorders including severe depression, autism spectrum disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder and had ingested magic mushrooms two days before the attack.
He said the attack was a “drug-induced hypomanic event” and that Veltman’s conduct around the time of the attack demonstrated “elevated” and “unpredictable” behaviour.
A forensic psychiatrist called to testify by the defence told the court Veltman did not qualify to be considered not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder, but did have mental health issues.
Dr. Julian Gojer said Veltman’s mental health issues may have affected his ability to plan his actions and understand their consequences. Gojer also said Veltman was diagnosed with complex trauma and personality disorders complicated by grief of a death in the family days before the attack.
Veltman’s defence lawyer said in closing arguments that his client, while not guilty of first- or second-degree murder, should still be held responsible for the deaths of the victims and could be found guilty of manslaughter.