Looking at the machinery behind the narrative attacks: Links 1 for September 3rd, 2023

1. This photo is from the Convoy in Ottawa in 2022. He pretty much nailed it. Please refer to it should CBC ramp it up again this fall, which looks likely, even if it is disguised better now that so many see the government propaganda agency’s most common rhetorical tricks. Remember, they use code for what they mean, which is always simple. One example is when the left refers to people who support the rule of law, the constitutional rights the people wrote for themselves when they founded the USA, and the paramount role of the individual as “MAGA types”. In other words, they have created a term, imputed a lot of negative associations with it when what they really mean is counter-revolutionary. CBC does these kinds of disinformation and rhetorical weaponry at various levels of expertise. Sometimes its clumsy and obvious and other times you have to think about what you heard or saw for a second or two before the trick manifests itself in your understanding. For example: CBC uses the word, “controversial” in a very specific way, usually to push Marcuse’s Repressive Tolerance. Put more simply, a thing is controversial if it is counter-revolutionary, and is not controversial when it is new, clearly untrue, clearly a key component of the dialectically driven revolution which has taken place in North America (and the West in general). The easiest example is someone who says that if a man declares himself to be a woman, then he is a woman and must be treated as such, even if he has been convicted of rape, and therefore should be sent to a woman’s prison. I don’t know if this specific example CBC has discussed. They likely avoided it altogether. But they would generally not call the idea that a man is a woman if he says he is controversial, while most definitely calling anyone who says that is not true, no matter what their credentials are. As if any were needed for that point of view.

As an aside, the man in the example linked above was the keynote speaker on the Trans-march and demo on Bank St. a couple of Fridays ago. He sported a T short with a knife on it advocating use of force and force multipliers in defence of “trans-kids”. A very aggressive example of repressive tolerance. In fact he defines repressive/liberating tolerance in this tweet which is inset in this photo.

Additionally the near criminalization of all who will not play along with the pseudo-reality being imposed on us all needs to be seen for what it is. Yesterday we posted a very short video of policemen trying to force their horses not to walk accross a rainbow flag painted on the street, instead, potentially endangering people on the sidewalk by making the horses move that way. Think about what this means for our civilization, rule of law and basic liberties, not to mention the degree to which Marcuse’s repressive Tolerance has become the de facto law of the land.

2. This one is interesting. We have a guy here who might actually be a bonafide Nazi group leader, and by that I don’t mean Nazi per se as Nazis are socialists, but not FBI larping as Nazis. Or at least not all of them. The funny moment here is his support of Joe Biden because he is financing and equipping the Azov battalion in Ukraine. This takes some unpacking 🙂

https://twitter.com/BGOnTheScene/status/1698109744504840597?s=20

Lots of good propaganda here for all sides 🙂

3. Rioting Africans in Norway. For some unknown reason, the same Arabic phrase can be heard over and over again during the general destruction of the results of a formerly trust based society.

4. U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) Awards Accrete Contract for AI Agent Argus to Detect Disinformation Threats from Social Media

Anomaly detection AI software, Argus, analyzes social media data to predict emergent narratives and generate intelligence reports at a speed and scale that empowers military forces to neutralize viral disinformation threats.

New York, NY, August 29, 2023 – Accrete AI, a leading dual-use enterprise AI company, deployed its AI software for open-source threat detection, Argus, with the U.S. Department of Defense in 2022. Today, Accrete is excited to announce that it has been awarded a new contract by the U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) to deploy Argus to enable intelligence analysts and special operators in USSOCOM to predict real time disinformation threats from social media.

“Synthetic media, including AI-generated viral narratives, deep fakes, and other harmful social media-based applications of AI, pose a serious threat to U.S national security and civil society,” said Prashant Bhuyan, Founder and CEO of Accrete. “Social media is widely recognized as an unregulated environment where adversaries routinely exploit reasoning vulnerabilities and manipulate behavior through the intentional spread of disinformation. USSOCOM is at the tip of the spear in recognizing the critical need to identify and analytically predict social media narratives at an embryonic stage before those narratives evolve and gain traction. Accrete is proud to support USSOCOM’s mission.”

After you put it through your Marxist to English secret decoder ring, you get ‘Government has deployed new AI weapon that will effectively find any counter-revolutionary messaging, especially where truthful and factual information contradicts Government narratives, and censor it potentially leading to punishment of those who post and read such counter-revolutionary materials. The proof of this is how groups like Hizb’Allah and Hamas and other terrorist groups operate with impunity as well as, and especially perhaps, communist revolutionary groups like ANTIFA etc. while anyone attempting to even look at the former baseline of our civilization when men and women were meaningful taxa

Accrete will also launch an enterprise version of Argus Social for disinformation threat detection later this year called Nebula Social. Nebula Social will address urgent customer pain points pertaining to AI-generated synthetic media, including heightened risk from viral disinformation and deep fakes. Managing AI-generated synthetic media risk requires an AI agent capable of autonomously learning what is most important to an enterprise and predicting the most relevant emergent social media narratives across modalities, including language, image, video, and audio, before they influence behavior. , is suppressed.

As usual, real problems are the excuse needed to launch ever more reductions of our rights. We see this now across the board and against every aspect of who we are. Yes, we do need a way to cope with deliberate disinformation, human caused or AI. Like that the vaxx is safe and effective for example. But when the same people who say Islam is the Religion of Peace, we are now entering an era of global Boiling, mRNA vaxx is safe and effective, are the same people deploying this software, you have a thesis, counter-thesis synthesis situation. Create the problem, then use the response to it to deploy your next weapon which you present as a solution, but is really moving you steps along the authoritarian revolutionary path.

5. Several question arise from this video:

A: Who is the guy on the right? Is it Robert Spencer? Or someone else.

B: What would happen if any of us did this same stunt with photos of Muslim or communist leaders?

C: Do you think he knows his bullets probably go a lot farther than the paper thin photos he is firing at? I guess he is sort of aiming downwards… but I wonder if he needs repairs on that wall. Geert Wilders posted this video.

Thank you all for checking out this site and considering the materials presented for the calculous of your own world views. The world is in an epistemological crisis in some ways, and in others, a crisis of the fundamentals of how we think as much as what we know to be true. For this site, a model is only as good as its predictive value, and that only works one way. In other words, if a model fails in all of its predictions, like anthropocentric Global Warming, its garbage. But if the predictions are true, more effort is needed to see if the model is the reason or if the model is covering for, or substituting for what the actual machinery of action is. In other words, a stage magician predicts, or gets you to predict what you think will happen next, and the entirety of his act depends on you not knowing the real reason it happened, and you also buying the fake reason it happened. In other words, if a magician says ABRACADABRA and a woman appears to be split in half, it had nothing to do with the words, other than they may be a queue for the woman who is the legs and the other woman who is the head to know the time has come to divide the box. This is entertainment. But a great deal of what is happening around us works on this principle.

And remember: