Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.
This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.
So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.
This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.
How many masters does Freeland serve and WHY is she still in office?
Epoch Times
Klaus Schwab says he counts on Freeland’s leadership in achieving WEF objectives.
WEF leader Klaus Schwab told Deputy Minister Chrystia Freeland he relies on her leadership to achieve the organization objectives according to a hand signed letter obtained by the Epoch Times.
“I have long counted on your leadership in ensuring multistakeholder efforts remain focused on results that are more equitable, sustainable and just” Schwab wrote in February 2022 letter.
The WEF is lead and attended by leaders in the field of business, politics and activism, and has as its motto “Committed to Improving the State of the World”.
The letter was an invitation to the May, 2022 annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, advising Ms Freeland of the schedule for the Board of Trustees meeting. she was appointed as a trustee in 2019 while serving as Foreign Minister.
The Epoch Times obtained the letter, as well as 2 others sent to Ms. Freeland by the WEF president Borge Brenda through the access of information request.
The Department of Finance initially told The Epoch Times it didn’t possess any records of the communication between Ms Freeland or her staff and leadership figures in the WEF.
After a complaint submitted to the Information Commissioner, the office launched an investigation and Finance Canada subsequently found some records, including 3 letters.
“After review, it has been determined that some of the information can be released,” wrote the department’s Access of Information and Privacy Division.
The 2022 WEF meeting was held under the theme “Preparing for the post-COVID era,” with Mr. Schwab highlighting in his letter that the event would be the “first truly global, in-person gathering to strengthen public-private cooperation.
The Great Reset
The WEF had sought to use the spread of SARS-COV-2 virus that originated in China in 2019 to redefine how societies and the world function.
(How many times did we hear WEF puppets, Justine and Freeland repeat this quote?)
“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of the opportunity to reflect, reimagine and reset our world,” Mr. Schwab said in relation to his “Great Reset” project detailed in his book of the same name and documented on the WEF website.
Mr. Schwab told Freeland the May meeting would cover key topics such as “restoring trust in the global system and its institutions, addressing the roots of global and national inequality” and “strengthening the resilience of the global health system”.
“Your presence at Davos will be of the utmost importance as participants look to drive significant action on these…..issues,” he wrote. “Thus I look forward to your guidance in working to build a better future for all.”
“I look forward to welcoming you again, personally in Davos”, concluded the WEF leader.
The Epoch Times asked Finance Canada to indicate whether Ms. Freeland attended the May 22 meeting. The Epoch Times could not find traces of her online. The Federal government had announced Industry Minister, Francois-Philippe would attend the forum.
Ms. Freeland did attend the January, 2023 meeting.
Other participants were John Kerry, Netherlands Prime Minister, Mark Rutte, former British Prime Ministers Boris Johnson and Tony Blair, Zelenskyy attended remotely.
The Epoch Times filed an access of Information request with Finance Canada to obtain details about the sessions, such as notes, remarks from Freeland but it said no such records exist.
A complaint has been filed and the Information Commissioner says it intends to investigate.
Canada has participated in at least 2 WEF Initiatives having impact on policy “Known Traveller Digital Identity “ project and the Agile Nations network.
The Federal government has also provided 17.4 million dollars in World Economic Forum funding in recent years.
The Epoch Times has other pending access to information requests to obtain internal documents about the relationship with the WEF.
Another book — The worldwide Corona Crisis – The Global Coup D’Etat Against Humanity by Michel Chossudovsky
VAIDS, Vaccine-Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
Vaccination against Covid-19 causes a marked decrease in immunity to heterologous pathogens such as viruses, bacteria and fungi.
Biden’s ATF Creating Sneaky Backdoor Against Gun Owners – Proposal Will Soon Be Finalized and Enacted
By Warner Todd Huston, The Western Journal Sep. 2, 2023 9:46 am20 Comments
Joe Biden launched a war against the Second Amendment during his first days in office, and now he is taking that attempt to eliminate our rights to another level.
Biden’s antagonistic Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is set to put new rules in place forcing background checks on more gun sales, according to The Washington Post.
“The rules would codify changes outlined in the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, which was signed by [Biden] in June 2022 and was the nation’s most significant gun-control legislation in 30 years,” the Post explained.
The rules are aimed at the mythical “gun show loophole” that liberals have been screaming about for years.
Biden wants people selling guns privately — meaning those who don’t do so for a living — to have to obtain a federal firearms dealer license. Then he wants to force whoever buys a gun from them to undergo an expensive background check.
Until now, private sellers have not faced these requirements.
What this means is that if you have your father’s old pistol, you can’t sell it to your neighbor for a few bucks unless you go through the intensive process of becoming a firearms dealer.
Do these rules violate the Second Amendment?
Yes No
Enter your email
Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
“The rules, which could be challenged in court, will be finalized and enacted after a 90-day public comment period,” the Post reported on Thursday.
Erich Pratt, senior vice president of Gun Owners of America, blasted the onerous new rules in a news release, saying, “Now, anyone who sells a single firearm in a given year and makes even a penny of profit will be subject to dealer requirements, including a background check.
“People need to realize this is just the next step in the anti-gunners’ longform playbook to enact backdoor universal registration of firearms, and eventually, to confiscate all firearms. They will not stop until that day.”
Biden has been throwing as many rules at the wall as he can to put more limits on the rights of law-abiding gun owners while doing next to nothing to stop actual gun crime.
For instance, soon after taking office, Biden pushed out an executive order targeting pistol braces, which leftists constantly lie about by saying they turn guns into “automatic weapons.”
At the same time, his first nominee to head the ATF was an anti-gun zealot named David Chipman, whom he later had to withdraw because Chipman was too radical.
The next year he was at it again, announcing huge restrictions on dealers to make guns harder to sell and therefore more expensive to buy.
The irony here is that criminals are not affected by any of Biden’s rules.
Criminals don’t attend gun shows or buy guns from a law-abiding neighbor. All these orders and regulations only serve to make it more difficult for normal citizens to exercise their right to bear arms.
Biden and his gun-grabbing regulators know all this well. But they don’t care because the goal is not to stop crime or nab criminals.
The goal is to turn law-abiding Americans into criminals so that the government can swoop in and confiscate their guns.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/bidens-atf-creating-sneaky-backdoor-gun-owners-proposal/
USVI Versus JPMorgan Chase: America’s Largest Bank Reported $1 BILLION in Suspicious Jeffrey Epstein Transactions to the US Treasury – But Only AFTER He Suspiciously Died in Prison While Awaiting Trial
By Paul Serran Sep. 2, 2023 9:55 am2 Comments
A lawsuit in Federal Court in New York is pitting the government of the US Virgin Islands territory against America’s largest bank, JPMorgan Chase.
The territory is suing the bank for at least $190 million, alleging that it ignored clear ‘red flags’ about convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s evidence of sex trafficking, because he was a wealthy and lucrative client.
During the pretrial hearings and motions, an enormous quantity of revelations about the Epstein trafficking ring has emerged, drawing the eyes of the world to this suit set to go to trial in late October.
Now, the latest discovery to his the news was the fact that JPMorgan Chase reported to the Treasury Department more than $1 billion in ‘suspicious’ transactions for the sex predator over 16 years – but they reported it ONLY after Epstein died a suspicious death in prison while awaiting trial.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/usvi-versus-jpmorgan-chase-americas-largest-bank-reported/
Kellyann
CISA And AT&T Pushed Connecting Elections To FirstNet, Mark Zuckerberg Paid FirstNet Bills, FirstNet Infested With Hackable Chinese Components
By Guest Contributor Sep. 2, 2023 9:30 am35 Comments
Recently, we broke the story that a nationwide cellular network for “public safety” called FirstNet was being used to connect election systems throughout the country.
Previously, it was believed that there could be no centralized national access to the precinct-level election equipment because the disparate networks and equipment used in each voting jurisdiction would make centralized spying or hacking too unwieldy. The existence of FirstNet blows that theory out of the water. Polling places are actively being standardized and federalized, creating the opportunity for central monitoring and manipulation by the federal government and leftist public-private organizations.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/cisa-att-pushed-connecting-elections-firstnet-mark-zuckerberg/
Major Lawsuit to Charge Biden with Corruption for Censorship Schemes
By Guest Contributor Sep. 2, 2023 7:30 am75 Comments
Guest by post by Bob Unruh
This article originally appeared on WND.com
ACLJ accusing DHS, other Deep State actors of constitutional violations
The American Center for Law and Justice has announced that it is working on a major lawsuit, on behalf of renowned commentator Charlie Kirk and his Turning Point USA organization, accusing the Biden administration of massive violations of the First Amendment.
In an online report, ACLJ official Jordan Sekulow explains it’s all about the government’s insistence that social media and other companies censor comments it dislikes.
As The BRICS Countries Stockpile Gold And Americans Scramble to Protect Themselves, A Faith-Based Company Shows Them How
The issue was discussed during a broadcast of “Sekulow.”
Jordan Sekulow’s report explained, “Before the 2020 election, Kirk had millions of followers on social media. But after President Biden’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) began suppressing conservative social media accounts, Kirk lost hundreds of thousands of followers. Such Deep State interference violated Kirk’s First Amendment right to free speech.”
He reported the campaign began “After the media promoted rampant false claims that Russia had stolen the 2016 election [and] the Obama Administration shifted its focus to foreign election threats.”
“When the Mueller Report found zero evidence of Russian collusion between President Donald Trump and Russia, the CISA broadened its scope of foreign threats to ‘domestic misinformation.’ Following this, it began clamping down on online information that it considered dangerous.”
Sekulow revealed, “As we understand, the DHS eventually equated what it labeled as ‘online misinformation’ to committing a cyberattack to interfere with any election. Then the DHS and CISA pressured social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram to censor conservative messages.”
Sekulow charged that government “message-throttling” violates the First Amendment.
On the broadcast, Kirk reported he began noticing that his messages weren’t reaching his followers during the 2020 presidential election.
“At the time, they had one of the largest conservative Twitter accounts in social media, with 120k–140k retweets a day, but then it started to taper off during the election cycle. And then after January 6, he truly felt his social media freefall after being put on a ‘do not amplify’ list,” the report explained.
He said the Biden regime “considered my views and the views of half the country – and more than half the country, in my opinion – to be that of domestic violent extremism.”
In fact, the Constitution bans the government from directly censorship speech, so it has been revealed that the Biden administration set up numerous channels with various foundations and outside organizations.
Biden officials would complain to those groups about messages they disliked, and then those organizations would complain to social media companies, whose officials would then suppress ideas Biden disliked.
The report noted Heritage Foundation, the Christian Broadcasting Network, Fox News, and many more also were victims of the Biden campaign.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/major-lawsuit-charge-biden-corruption-censorship-schemes/
American Thinker
September 2, 2023
Anti-Trump RINOS and the 14th Amendment
By Don Brown
It’s often said that “birds of a feather flock together.” Now, as the 2024 election nears, anti-trump RINOs and radical anti-constitutional Democrats have become birds of a feather, who share a common philosophy:
“Whatever you do, don’t let the voters decide.“ In other words, “Invent reasons to make the courts kick Trump off the ballot.”
Left to the voters, neither establishment RINOs in the primaries nor Biden in the general election can fairly defeat Trump. Who else draws 50,000 people to a rural South Carolina town of 3,500 people, when it’s 95° degrees outside?
This they know. Without foul play, Trump steamrolls them all, and it’s not even close.
Enter their 14th Amendment shenanigans, their latest concoction of legal baloney designed to trigger CNN to mention it enough to make low-information voters believe it’s true.
The 14th Amendment, one of three post-Civil War amendments passed in 1866, contains several important legal provisions, including the Due Process Clause, the Equal Protection Clause, and the Citizenship Clause. But a lesser-known provision in Section 3 of the Amendment — the “Insurrection Clause,” targeting individuals who have engaged in rebellion or insurrection against the United States, has gotten the RINOs excited.
Under the Insurrection Clause, no person shall hold certain federal or state offices if they previously took an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and then engaged in rebellion or insurrection against it. Historically, this applied to Confederate officers who first swore allegiance to the United States, but then launched massive armed attacks upon the United States complete with guns, cannons, and bayonets, and actually spilled oceans of American blood.
Remember Antietam? The bloodiest day in American History? “23,000 soldiers were killed, wounded or missing after twelve hours of savage combat on September 17, 1862.” How about Manassas or Gettysburg?
Never mind the guns, cannons, and bayonets. To get Trump, RINOS and Democrats join together to twist the Insurrection Clause into something opposite of its original meaning.
Anti-Trump RINOs like Asa Hutchinson now spew this ridiculous “Insurrection Clause” argument, as Hutchinson did on August 24 during the first Fox News presidential debate among Republican second-stringers. “More people are understanding the importance of that,” Hutchinson said, “including conservative legal scholars, who say he may be disqualified under the 14th Amendment from being President, again, as a result of the insurrection
Then RINO New Hampshire Secretary of State, David Scanlan, “caught wind” of “legal scholars” arguing that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Disqualification Clause prohibits Trump from being on the presidential ballot. Scanlan will be “asking the attorney general’s office for their input.”
What a crock.
RINO pining aside, this argument doesn’t hold water.
Let’s start with a bit of logic. In the historical context of the 14th Amendment, insurrection meant Confederate forces waging war on the United States government by force of arms. So, an outside Army attacked the United States, on multiple occasions over four years, from 1861-1865, drawing the blood of thousands of Americans.
The Disqualification Clause, that is the clause disqualifying an insurrectionist from serving in office, addressed waging war by force of arms, not preventing an American President from questioning a fraudulent election, or urging his Vice President to send electors back to the states for clarification.
Consider this: How can the United States government launch an insurrection against itself? Trump on January 6 was President of the United States, the head of the Executive Branch of the United States Government.
Yet RINOs and Democrats want us to believe that Trump could launch an insurrection against himself. That’s how dumb this whole thing is.
Confederates left the government and then attacked it. By contrast, Trump remained in the government, and was the head of the U.S. government. Unlike Lee, he did not attack the U.S. Army at Antietam.
Constitutionally, the President can criticize Congress, and urge members to act in certain ways. This is part of the genius system of checks-and-balances under the Constitution, to prevent one branch from dominating the others. But the government cannot cause an insurrection against itself.
To hear the RINOs and Democrats squeal, you’d think Trump launched a military attack against Congress, declaring himself dictator for life. Perhaps we missed the reports where he ordered the 82nd Airborne to jump into the U.S. Capitol to arrest spineless legislators perpetrating fraud. Conservative media cropped that part out, to protect Trump.
No, Trump tried persuading Congress, and his Vice President, to combat election fraud, which is his right.
Yet Hutchinson and his RINO buddies yell “insurrection.”
Okay Asa… If Trump committed insurrection, why hasn’t Dirty Jack charged him with it?
Federal law specifically criminalizes insurrection. Under 28 U.S.C § 2383, “Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Query: If Dirty Jack Smith could get away with criminally charging “insurrection,” who thinks he would not bring that charge?
But Trump has not been charged, criminally, with “insurrection.” Not even Jack Smith is that stupid, as such a charge would get thrown out on appeal before it got started.
Though not defined, the clear context of “insurrection” means an armed insurrection against the United States by one who has denounced the United States.
After the Civil War ended in 1865, Confederate President Jefferson Davis, who, unlike Trump, commanded an Army against the United States, was captured and imprisoned for two years, was later released and never tried for treason or insurrection
Robert E. Lee, the commanding general of the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia, was not prosecuted for insurrection.
Former U.S. Vice President John C. Breckinridge, who denounced American citizenship and served as a Confederate general, was not prosecuted for insurrection.
Confederate General Simon Bolivar Buckner was not prosecuted for insurrection, and later became governor of Kentucky.
Confederate General Fitzhugh Lee, Robert E. Lee’s nephew, was not prosecuted for insurrection and became governor of Virginia.
So, Jeff Davis, Robert E. Lee, Fitzhugh Lee, Breckenridge, and Buckner, all of whom waged war against the United States, and two who later became governors of their states, (which the 14th Amendment also prohibits) were not charged with insurrection. But RINOS like Hutchinson want to disqualify Trump for “insurrection” because largely unarmed civilians marched to the U.S. Capitol to protest election fraud?
Democrat constitutional scholar Alan Dershowitz argues correctly that a fair reading of the text and history of the 14th Amendment makes it clear that the disability provision was intended to apply to those who served the Confederacy during the Civil War.
The Civil War did not repeat itself on January 6, when Trump said “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.” “Peacefully and patriotically” are not words of insurrection.
Again, where does Trump say, “Take up your AR-15s, and go attack the Capitol?”
He doesn’t. Instead, it’s “Peacefully and patriotically” and “we’re going to cheer on our brave senators.”
On January 6, after Trump exhorted supporters to remain peaceful, not a single firearm was found among the “insurrectionists” inside the U.S. Capitol, according to the FBI.
But never mind the facts.
Hypocrites like Hutchison and other RINOs who yap about “insurrection” and treat the Constitution with such dishonest contempt, to grab power for themselves, are the real enemies of the republic
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/09/antitrump_rinos_and_the_14th_amendment.html
Maryland Election Board Quietly Changes Rules, Threatens Legal Action Against Those Who Challenge Elections Based on Voter Rolls
By Jim H?ft Sep. 2, 2023 11:00 am4 Comments
The Baltimore County Board of Elections (BOE) quietly amended Regulation .06, which governs the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) for the purchase of voter registration lists. The change, proposed on February 9, 2023, and later adopted on April 7, became effective on July 10, Uncover DC reported.
Kate Sullivan, a Maryland citizen actively involved in voter canvassing and scrutinizing voter rolls, has raised concerns about recent amendments to an NDA governing the use of voter lists.
During an unrecorded BOE meeting on July 26, board attorney Andrew Bailey read the updated NDA language. According to Kate Sullivan, the board’s presentation of the NDA was conspicuously orchestrated.
Sullivan recalls, “He stood up, looking directly at me, and first said, ‘This is the oath that you sign. We want to read it to all those who purchased the list.’ He did not say there’s updated language. He did not say this is a new oath. He just said this is the oath you sign when
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/maryland-election-board-quietly-changes-rules-threatens-legal/
PURE EVIL: Pelosi Who Supports Abortion Up to Birth – Smears Trump Supporters for Not Respecting “Dignity and Worth of Every Person”
By Jim Hoft Sep. 2, 2023 12:40 pm79 Comments
There’s a special place in hell for this one.
Earlier today Kristinn Taylor reported on Nancy Pelosi’s vile attacks against Trump and Trump supporters.
Pelosi accused the 75 million strong Trump supporters of not respecting the “dignity and worth of every person.”
Here is what Nancy Pelosi says about conservatives.
Of course, Pelosi was out gaslighting the masses once again.
Nancy Pelosi has a 100% pro-abortion voting record. She is has the top rating from NARAL.
No baby is safe in America while Nancy Pelosi is in office.
Here is Pelosi’s record on the dignity of life.
Via OnTheIssues.
Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines.
Allows federal funding for research that utilizes human embryonic stem cells, regardless of the date on which the stem cells were derived from a human embryo, provided such embryos:
have been donated from in vitro fertilization clinics;
were created for the purposes of fertility treatment;
were in excess of the needs of the individuals seeking such treatment and would otherwise be discarded; and
were donated by such individuals with written informed consent and without any financial or other inducements.
Proponents support voting YES because:
Since 2 years ago, the last Stem Cell bill, public support has surged for stem cells. Research is proceeding unfettered and, in some cases, without ethical standards in other countries. And even when these countries have ethical standards, our failures are allowing them to gain the scientific edge over the US. Some suggest that it is Congress’ role to tell researchers what kinds of cells to use. I suggest we are not the arbiters of research. Instead, we should foster all of these methods, and we should adequately fund and have ethical oversight over all ethical stem cell research.
Opponents support voting NO because:
A good deal has changed in the world of science. Amniotic fluid stem cells are now available to open a broad new area of research. I think the American people would welcome us having a hearing to understand more about this promising new area of science. As it stands today, we will simply have to debate the bill on the merits of information that is well over 2 years old, and I think that is unfortunate.
The recent findings of the pluripotent epithelial cells demonstrates how quickly the world has changed. Wouldn’t it be nice to have the researcher before our committee and be able to ask those questions so we may make the best possible judgment for the American people?
Reference: Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act; Bill HR 3 (“First 100 hours”) ; vote number 2007-020 on Jan 11, 2007
Voted YES on allowing human embryonic stem cell research.
To provide for human embryonic stem cell research. A YES vote would:
Call for stem cells to be taken from human embryos that were donated from in vitro fertilization clinics
Require that before the embryos are donated, that it be established that they were created for fertility treatment and in excess of clinical need and otherwise would be discarded
Stipulate that those donating the embryos give written consent and do not receive any compensation for the donation.
Reference: Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act; Bill HR 810 ; vote number 2005-204 on May 24, 2005
Trending: WAYNE ROOT: Tucker is Outing Obama as Gay. But Everyone is Missing the Big Story. I’m Obama’s College Classmate. I’ve Been Trying to Warn America for 15 Years!
Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions.
To prevent the transportation of minors in circumvention of certain laws relating to abortion, and for other purposes, including:
Allowing for exemptions to the law if the life of the minor is in danger or if a court in the minor’s home state waive the parental notification required by that state
Allocating fines and/or up to one year imprisonment of those convicted of transporting a minor over state lines to have an abortion
Penalizing doctors who knowingly perform an abortion procedure without obtaining reasonable proof that the notification provisions of the minor’s home state have been satisfied
Requiring abortion providers in states that do not have parental consent laws and who would be performing the procedure on a minor that resides in another state, to give at least a 24 hour notice to the parent or legal guardian
Specifying that neither the minor nor her guardians may be prosecuted or sued for a violation of this act
Reference: Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act; Bill HR 748 ; vote number 2005-144 on Apr 27, 2005
Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime.
Vote to pass a bill that would make it a criminal offense to harm or kill a fetus during the commission of a violent crime. The measure would set criminal penalties, the same as those that would apply if harm or death happened to the pregnant woman, for those who harm a fetus. It is not required that the individual have prior knowledge of the pregnancy or intent to harm the fetus. This bill prohibits the death penalty from being imposed for such an offense. The bill states that its provisions should not be interpreted to apply a woman’s actions with respect to her pregnancy.
Reference: Unborn Victims of Violence Act; Bill HR 1997 ; vote number 2004-31 on Feb 26, 2004
Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life.
Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: Vote to pass a bill banning a medical procedure, which is commonly known as “partial-birth” abortion. The procedure would be allowed only in cases in which a women’s life is in danger, not for cases where a women’s health is in danger. Those who performed this procedure, would face fines and up to two years in prison, the women to whom this procedure is performed on are not held criminally liable.
Reference: Bill sponsored by Santorum, R-PA; Bill S.3 ; vote number 2003-530 on Oct 2, 2003
Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research.
Vote to pass a bill that would forbid human cloning and punish violators with up to 10 years in prison and fines of at least $1 million. The bill would ban human cloning, and any attempts at human cloning, for both reproductive purposes and medical research. Also forbidden is the importing of cloned embryos or products made from them.
Reference: Human Cloning Prohibition Act; Bill HR 534 ; vote number 2003-39 on Feb 27, 2003
Voted NO on funding for health providers who don’t provide abortion info.
Abortion Non-Discrimination Act of 2002: Vote to pass a bill that would prohibit the federal, state and local governments that receive federal funding from discriminating against health care providers, health insurers, health maintenance organizations, and any other kind of health care facility, organization or plan, that decline to refer patients for, pay for or provide abortion services. In addition the bill would expand an existing law “conscience clause” that protects physician training programs that refuse to provide training for abortion procedures.
Reference: Bill sponsored by Bilirakis, R-FL; Bill HR 4691 ; vote number 2002-412 on Sep 25, 2002
Voted NO on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad.
Vote to adopt an amendment that would remove language reversing President Bush’s restrictions on funding to family planning groups that provide abortion services, counseling or advocacy.
Reference: Amendment sponsored by Hyde, R-IL; Bill HR 1646 ; vote number 2001-115 on May 16, 2001
Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortions.
HR 3660 would ban doctors from performing the abortion procedure called “dilation and extraction” [also known as “partial-birth” abortion]. The measure would allow the procedure only if the life of the woman is at risk.
Reference: Bill sponsored by Canady, R-FL; Bill HR 3660 ; vote number 2000-104 on Apr 5, 2000
Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion.
The Child Custody Protection Act makes it a federal crime to transport a minor across state lines for the purpose of obtaining an abortion.
Reference: Bill sponsored by Ros-Lehtinen, R-FL; Bill HR 1218 ; vote number 1999-261 on Jun 30, 1999
Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/pure-evil-pelosi-who-supports-abortion-up-birth/
Hunger Games: EPA Will Not Clean Up Toxic Chemical Spill in Trump-Voting Ohio District East Palestine Until 2024… If Ever (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft Sep. 2, 2023 12:00 pm69 Comments
Toxic chemical explosion in East Palestine, Ohio after 2023 train derailment.
The Biden regime not only does not care about the horrific suffering of residents in East Palestine, Ohio they seem to revel in it.
Just remember, they refused outright assistance to the town for weeks following a massive train derailment and mushroom cloud toxic chemical explosion.
The Daily Mail reported in late February that the EPA ordered Norfolk Southern to pause the clean-up of the toxic train derailment that happened on February 3. The EPA claims the stop would be “temporary.”
Purdue scientists and students studied over 300 samples in and around East Palestine, Ohio, in March. In February state and federal officials decided to blow up six railcars of toxic chemicals in the town after a train derailment. This resulted in a toxic chemical mushroom cloud over the region.
The toxic chemical explosion caused animal and plant life to die off over 100 miles downstream from the Ohio town.
Purdue investigators were on site collecting samples after the toxic chemical explosion. Pittsburgh researchers found low levels of six different carcinogens that the EPA did not detect.
In March EPA chief Michael Regan warned Ohio parents to keep their children out of the local creeks and streams following the toxic chemical mushroom cloud explosion in early February.
Joe Biden has NEVER visited the disaster site.
This weekend FOX News reporter Garrett Tenney reported that the EPA will not clean up the toxic chemical spill in East Palestine until next year – if it ever happens.
The regime knows these poor people will not vote for Joe Biden or the radical Democrats – so there you have it.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/hunger-games-epa-will-not-clean-up-toxic/
Transcript: Mayor Adams, NYPD Commissioner Caban Take Historic Step To Embrace Adhan, Muslim Call To Prayer Citywide
NYC – August 29, 2023
https://www.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/624-23/transcript-mayor-adams-nypd-commissioner-caban-take-historic-step-embrace-adhan-muslim-call
Mayor Eric Adams Announces Islamic Call To Prayer Will Be Allowed In NYC On Fridays & During Ramadan
Forbes Breaking News – August 29, 2023
Jovan’s September 2, 2023 Program
Warning Adult Language/Content.
7:09… Words Matter – Proud Boy – J6
42:43 – Viewer Clttadasa has a complaint. Jovan brings him on the show.
And we learn about what is happening with election integrity and esp. what Jovan is going thru. Can you image putting all that work in and then to find that you are being back stabbed by the so-called friendlies.
https://rumble.com/v3e732b-the-court-cases-arent-doing-crap-the-judges-are-bad-lets-discuss-this.html