1. How medical regulatory bodies now operate on dialectical lines, as opposed to medicine, science or public health
(As I have come to expect, his observations are good but his analysis is SO bad it’s actually dangerous. They didn’t change the language to solve problems. They changed the language to cause the problems.)
An employee at Kaiser Permanente, one of the largest healthcare providers on the West Coast, reached out to us after she was mandated to take a new staff training on “gender affirming care.” The employee, who wishes to remain anonymous for fear of losing her job, was horrified that a healthcare facility would be promoting the mutilation and castration of children.Let’s take a deep dive into what Kaiser is teaching their staff about children transitioning. First, the learning objections state that employees should be able to “explain the importance of gender affirming care to patients.” Doctors need to be able to explain to teenagers why it’s so important to get their breasts chopped off! Makes complete sense.
3. This article is important. Christian biblical use is now hate speech in Finland. But Finland has also convicted people of hate speech that tell the truth about Islam. We have a very important advancement of the dialectic in terms of weapons against reason and classical thought here in this article. While it fails to mention how hate speech is used to protect Islamic intolerance towards “protected groups” it details how one person was destroyed for referencing biblical principles on homosexuality.
We Cannot Say We Weren’t Warned
Believe it or not, the Trial of the Century just happened in a courtroom in Helsinki. The Finnish parliamentarian and physician Päivi Räsänen this week returned to the dock to face hate crimes charges for having quoted the Bible in defense of Scripture’s teaching on homosexuality.
While it is not altogether surprising that yet another Christian has been brought up on charged of blaspheming against LGBTs—who have been elevated from ordinary people, as equal as anybody else, into liberalism’s divinities—a statement the Finnish prosecution made in the trial’s opening raised the proceedings from an ordinary example of post-Christian liberalism’s contempt for the faith and free speech, into something epochal. Attention must be paid.
In her opening statement on Thursday, the Finnish prosecutor said, of a 2004 pamphlet authored by Dr. Räsänen, “The point isn’t whether it is true or not, but that this is insulting.”
Think about that: The point is not whether these words true or not, but that someone’s feelings were hurt by them.
This is the essence of totalitarianism: the demand to control reality. The Finnish state attempts to outlaw not simply expression it does not like, but facts it finds offensive. This little statement by grim-faced prosecutor Anu Mantila is what makes this two-day legal proceeding the Trial of the Century.
(Again, the importance of this article lies in what is missing, but we all should know by now. This is the use of ‘hate-crimes’ as a highly specific dialectical tool for the advancement of the COMINTERN. For the ultimate power of the state. To determine the sum of 2+2 whatever it is they need it to be that day.)
4. Bad news about the vaxx is a kind of staple now of counter-narrative sites like this one. One has to be very careful with them as a lot of them have been, well, bullshit. Worse, bad news about the vaxx which is untrue, is clearly planed by the enemy in order to make the real bad news seem untrue. Basic information warfare. This seems pretty likely given that we already know that the shots used Pseudo-uridine and contained 30% DNA, which are the factories which make the mRNA. So this means that many people who got the shots indeed continue to make the spike protein for a long time after the shots. Contrary to what everyone was told by the people demanding we all get them. For more on the injected DNA in the shots, please see this video.
5. Below, an excellent example of Repressive Tolerance. The Marcusean strategy of making the anti-Western narratives effectively sacred, and forcing all conventional views into silence, and ultimately to be criminal.
Thank you all for checking out this site. Been a busy day today. More to come tomorrow
Please consider revisiting the article at RAIR with the interview with Dr. Mark Trozzi. There is now additional materials and links which show the nature of the CPSO as it really is. If you live in Ontario, you may not watch it according to … you know I don’t know, law I guess. But there are serious instructions that inside Ontario you cannot watch the CPSO proceedings. But outside Ontario and Canada you can. Or at least they can’t do anything about it. So check the story at RAIR and look for the links. Especially the closing statement by Dr. Trozzi’s Lawyer in video #6. It is quite enlightening.
I don’t have an ability to describe a society where Truth isn’t a defense.
If a statement that is, on its face, true, then in what world is that a legally punishable offense?
ANY Marxist state. Canada is operated via means nearly no one recognizes. The annoying word for it is dialectical.
But look at the video of the cops on horses. They actually have to treat a flag denoting celebration of homosexuality as such a sacred symbol, it is better to risk public safety by maneuvering the horses onto the sidewalks. Even though the horses themselves seem to know better.
This is about the state being the determiners of truth. There is no room for objectivity in a state like this. Objective truth is the greatest threat to the socialist state. But don’t take it from me. Take it from Goebbels. If anyone understood this, he did.
https://vladtepesblog.com/wp-content/uploads//2021/02/Goebbels-big-lie-quote-in-full.png