About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

31 Replies to “This is the moment where any more injections done become a criminal matter”

  1. ” sent me a paper from the medical journal Circulation which proves”

    Okay. Where is this paper?

    No, I’m not sending a video around to people; it’s not easily referrable and examinable evidence. No, I’m not watching it myself either. If it is information worth conveying, it can be conveyed in text, a form which is more concise, more parsable, and more easily communicated to others.

    The purpose of presenting information in video form is to obscure the fundamental weakness of the argument by leveraging social instincts in the audience. If it’s real, if it’s measurable, it can be presented in text.

    Where is the link to, or text of, the referred article in Circulation? What is the evidence presented?

    This kind of FUD bullshit is exactly why the antivaxxers have not succeeded in persuading a critical mass of people. Please stop sabotaging yourselves. Please start taking this seriously. Present the evidence in easily examinable form or SHUT THE FUCK UP.

    Sincerely, a notvaxxed

    • Very well stated.
      If we are to convince the vaxxed they have done the unthinkable, we need hard evidence not conjecture.

    • why t.f you don’t look up the papers yourself while our MSM are struggling to keep a lid on all the publications from all over the world which abundantly prove what he is saying. But maybe it’s time for you start complaining about the luck of proof for Galilei’s heliocentric “conspiracy theory”
      or else SHUT THE FUCK UP

      • Steven gundry I’d the doctor all over you tube that tries to sell us his book and lectures
        I will never believe this guy.
        However the inflammation is not a lie.it’s all over and I know people with side effects that will never even try the Second jab

    • Go to https://vernoncoleman.com/. Here you will find texts for his videos and many references. Vernon Coleman is an institution, and he has been sharing his medical knowledge for a very long time. His web site is not slick, and he is not always thorough in referencing things, but he is most often correct and his claims can be etified. That is why he has a huge following and many successful books to his credit. I have a lot of time for him.

    • What is certain is they are still experimental and they aren’t working. And gov leaders are going into a panic although the very high majority of their citizenry is fully-jabbed. Now, why would that be?

      I listen to a British music radio station. Through gov adverts, they are telling their listeners that all people 50+years old must now get two more booster shots and the Influenza shot. That’s an awful lot of stuff injected into your body in a short time. The immune system will go into helter-skelter overdrive. I just don’t see this ending well.

      Daily Mail link from today: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10240501/Risk-COVID-19-infection-DOUBLES-90-days-second-dose-Pfizer-vaccine.html

      ME: Three days ago, I started not feeling well for no reason. I’m a hermit and a loner. I was fine when I went to bed but upon awakening, I had Flu-like symptoms. And by noontime, I wanted to go back to bed (no energy, sick).

      A few days before, I had visited two double-jabbed friends who live in a tiny house with no aeration. I was worried I had caught the damn virus. Anyway, around 1 pm, I decided to take a dose of liquid Ivermectin, 1.4 ml. Yesterday evening, I had enough energy to start typing coherently.

      This morning is my 4th day on Ivermectin (decreasing dosage after the first one) and I woke up much better. My brain is clearing up also, more energy.

      Coming back to the jabs, It’s not working. This is not difficult to understand and the havoc they are wreaking on the immune system is serious stuff.

    • Umm – respectfully that is not the paper, but the abstract. Where is the full paper? Do you have to be a member of Circulation to see it?

      Also troubling the expression of concern from the American Heart Association:
      “There are several typographical errors, there is no data in the abstract regarding myocardial T-cell infiltration, there are no statistical analyses for the significance provided, and the author is not clear that only anecdotal data was used.”

      In other words, no science: no statistical certainty that the results found were statistically significant.

      This would not stand up in a U.S. Court.

  7. Hey Notvaxxed.
    You shut the fuck up. My 14 year old grand son found the article/abstract in 30 seconds.

    • And sadly, as Iggy has pointed out, it’s garbage. “35=/-20” is meaningless and the kind of typo that would never get into an abstract for a prestigious journal.like Circulation.

  8. Though Dr. Vernon Coleman quotes from what may be a likable rapscallion, that runs an underground paper this is the original source.

    How much value of the research, who did it, needs to be made a lot clearer, as it more than sounds warning bells.

    … Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
    Steven R Gundry : Originally published 8 Nov 2021
    https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

    Which tracks down to here, where this seems to first discussed by the American Heart Association, Scientific Sessions.
    It is in the lower part where it the vaccine seems to arise.

    FS.04 – Acute Cardiovascular Implications of COVID Infection and Vaccination
    November 14,
    https://www.abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/9349/session/541

    Conclusion. The incidence of myocarditis, although low, was increased following Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine, particularly after the second compared to the first dose, as well as compared to unvaccinated individuals, and to historical controls. Young males accounted for most cases.
    – Myocarditis After BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine: Active Surveillance by the Israeli Ministry of Health : Dror Mevorach

    (No abstract papers with this one so far).
    – Putting Risk into Perspective: CV Risks of COVID and COVID Vaccination
    Nir Uriel, Chicago, IL

    The above link on Nir Uriel was where I thought there may be gold on this issue.
    Is it because he talks about vaccine problems? that no further info?

    Nir Uriel seems to be well up on heart issues, transplants, heart failure.
    I looked to see in news, etc,. but zilch about covid vaccine issues.
    At this stage I leave you with his twitter feed, and one would think these guys should benoticing some of these problems coming through.
    Can they openly speak about it though?
    https://twitter.com/nirurielmd

    Just to note there is the difference of people getting Covid and the people who are vaccinated.
    I may have missed the correct paper where Dr, Vernon Coleman is quoting.
    This is getting all above my pay grade. ?

    The original “likable rapscallion” may be bonafide and a loud mouth, and best intentions and the Light papers he quotes from, of course is denigrated by mainstream media, but as I link to so some one may be able to find names and maybe some ‘good standing’ to look further?
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/27/truthpaper-the-anti-lockdown-newspaper-bypassing-online-fact-checkers

    How ever no ‘Light Paper’ at this stage.

    Appreciate all the other commentators, as certainly something stinks, smoldering away.

  9. It is appropriate to insist on putting up the link. This can be done politely.

    We are all a little frazzled over this crap.

  10. The abstract mentioned is so poorly written & edited as to immediately be suspect of less than science; I wish that were not so.

    As an example:
    “Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac.”

    Obviously, the “35=/-20” should be something like “35+/-20”; and similar for the following. what on earth then would be “82=/-75”???

    That +/- (plus or minus) 75 is so nonsensical as to call the entire abstract into question. A link to THE ACTUAL PAPER and not just the abstract would be most helpful.

    Or am I missing something as a non-scientist?

  11. The abstract mentioned is so poorly written & edited as to immediately be suspect of less than science; I wish that were not so.

    As an example:
    “Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac.”

    Obviously, the “35=/-20” should be something like “35+/-20”; and similar for the following. what on earth then would be “82=/-75”???

    That +/- (plus or minus) 75 is so nonsensical as to call the entire abstract into question. A link to THE ACTUAL PAPER and not just the abstract would be most helpful.

    Or am I missing something as a non-scientist?

  12. When the gaslighting and shilling reach this magnitude, the trolls come crawling out of the woodwork, sperging about typo’s, or offering opinions from the Bench on the supposed admissibility in court…as if commies care about courts; re: Rittenhouse et al.
    When the slopbots crawl out, one knows that the information being attacked is a .338 Lapua right through the beasts foul heart.

  13. So fun to read everyone flaming each other because they don’t want to believe the obvious: the clot shot is a death sentence.
    Divide and conquer.
    In other news, the American Red Cross now states on its blood donation scheduling website that while vaxxed persons are still welcome to donate, Red Cross now needs to know the manufacturer of the donor’s vaccine to determine donor eligibility.
    This is a MEDICAL HOLOCAUST unfolding and instead of dealing with it we bicker over trivia: “there are typos in the article” or “the abstract is garbage”. Keep pretending, I’m sure they’ll let us keep living in Dreamtime of Comfort.

  14. Go to https://vernoncoleman.com/. Here you will find texts for his videos and many references. Vernon Coleman is an institution, and he has been sharing his medical knowledge for a very long time. His web site is not slick, and he is not always thorough in referencing things, but he is most often correct and his claims can be etified. That is why he has a huge following and many successful books to his credit. I have a lot of time for him.

  15. OK, let’s simplify the debate. We may not know for decades what the long term effects of these experimental genetic treatments are, so, for now, let’s shelve this discussion. For now.

    The Western society is based on common law – at least the Anglosphere portion of it.

    So, let’s stipulate – for the purpose of this discussion – that the mRNA genetic treatments being mandated by ’emergency powers’ are 100% non-harmful and are, indeed, helpful in controlling Covid-19. Just for the purpose of this discussion…

    The fact remains that at the time these treatments are mandated – stripping people who do not submit to the treatment – before there was sufficient time for full safety testing…and let’s not lie to ourselves, these were rushed through the system without the decade-and-a-half testing period required for vaccines and drugs…that means that we will have accepted a legal precedent that governments and/or employers and/or places of business may impose experimental medical treatments to be mandatory, without the required long term safety testing.

    Even if these shots are 100% what the government tells us, if we accept their word and submit to their mandates, this will set a legal precedent that gives the powers that be the legal power to mandate other, future experimental treatments, which may be downright dangerous.

    This fight ought not be about this particular treatment – it is about surrendering our right to refuse treatments we do not want.

    It is the inversion of our rights, surrendering of our autonomy to un-elected bureaucrats with no oversight powers, enforced by the power of an ever-growing government and a virtue-signalling portion of our population who feels great pleasure and moral superiority for turning in their neighbours.

    And that is how totalitarian systems can function…

    • I’ll reduce it a bit more, using femminazi-commie language:
      My Body, My CHOICE.
      No means No!

      ( Or, as a mate once demanded of a particularly obnoxious dickless tracy intent on a warrant-less roadside search…” Whaddo I have to do? Write NO on my schwanz and schtup it into you?”