why the vaccine is such a con from an immunological perspective.

This is now a sticky post by request, which means everything newer is below it for now. Also the link to the article will be in the blogroll.

From Mad W:

This is a good article (IMO) that recently got posted on the C3RF site. The second link is the original blog by Julius Reuchel. The article is really long but good at explaining why the vaccine is such a con from an immunological perspective.

 

https://www.canadiancitizens.org/single-post/julius-ruechel-dissects-the-vaccine-narrative

 

https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html

If a plumber with a lifetime of experience were to tell you that water runs uphill, you would know he is lying and that the lie is not accidental. It is a lie with a purpose. If you can also demonstrate that the plumber knows in advance that the product he is promoting with that lie is snake oil, you have evidence for a deliberate con. And once you understand what’s really inside that bottle of snake oil, you will begin to understand the purpose of the con.

One of the most common reasons given for mass COVID vaccinations is the idea that if we reach herd immunity through vaccination, we can starve the virus out of existence and get our lives back. It’s the COVID-Zero strategy or some variant of it.

By now it is abundantly clear from the epidemiological data that the vaccinated are able to both catch and spread the disease. Clearly vaccination isn’t going to make this virus disappear. Only a mind that has lost its grasp on reality can fail to see how ridiculous all this has become.

But a tour through pre-COVID science demonstrates that, from day one, long before you and I had even heard of this virus, it was 100% inevitable and 100% predictable that these vaccines would never be capable of eradicating this coronavirus and would never lead to any kind of lasting herd immunity. Even worse, lockdowns and mass vaccination have created a dangerous set of circumstances that interferes with our immune system’s ability to protect us against other respiratory viruses. They also risk driving the evolution of this virus towards mutations that are more dangerous to both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated alike. Lockdowns, mass vaccinations, and mass booster shots were never capable of delivering on any of the promises that were made to the public.

Please continue here:

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

16 Replies to “why the vaccine is such a con from an immunological perspective.”

    • “There’s a difference between breakthrough infections and breakthrough disease.

      Breakthrough infections occur when a fully vaccinated person tests positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Breakthrough disease occurs when a fully vaccinated person experiences symptoms of COVID-19 disease.

      Vaccines remain highly effective at preventing severe disease, breakthrough infections and disease among vaccinated individuals remain uncommon, and most of the new COVID-19 cases in the U.S. are among unvaccinated people.

      Still, the exact rates of breakthrough cases are unknown at this time because cases may be asymptomatic and, until recently, the CDC didn’t recommend that vaccinated people be tested following exposure. For this reason, updated guidance states that vaccinated people should resume wearing a mask in indoor public areas, especially where there is high transmission of COVID-19.”
      https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2021/new-data-on-covid-19-transmission-by-vaccinated-individuals

      • PC at my hospital where I am an ICU nurse what we are seeing is that elderly non vaxxed pts with comorbidities are coming down with the disease. While most of the pts under the age of 40 that have it DID have the vaxx and still became ill. A year ago we seldom saw anyone under the age of 40 with it. Now, we have a fairly large amount of younger people with this diagnosis and they almost all were vaxxed. My wife who works at a different hospital and a good friend of mine who is a nurse at a third different hospital all more than 40 miles from each other are also seeing this same result. This part of Florida gets a lot of snowbirds during the winter and last year almost all of my covid pts had east coast accents. Now they are all locals.

      • PC, what testing? There is no effective test for covid, sure they use the PCR but it is hardly considered reliable. So if no reliable test, your statement about break through or any other facet of this gene therapy called a vax is bunk. It’s all bunk, including any talk of variants – what test is used for ‘delta’? There isn’t one. You’ve been lied to. Where were all the flu and pneumonia cases last year? There are certainly viruses in our environment, and some can make you I’ll. We can argue which traditional vax is effective or not BUT C19 was and is a lie from day one. It’s just a means to hurry the unsuspecting public to an unsavory future.

        • There is no reliable test for any covid strain and no way to determine a variant. Alpha, Beta , Delta? Who knows. But pts with the bioweapon infection do exhibit certain specific symptoms. One is the “ground glass” chest xray. It isn’t showing infection. It is showing the heme in the blood separating out and flooding the lungs. This is why we can’t keep their 02 levels up. Their alveoli are blocked. Another is blood clotting. A real covid pt will get to the point where we practically cannot draw labs on them. Their blood clots so fast it doesn’t even make it to the specimen tube. It coagulates in the piping. I think it is telling that the attempted goal levels of population induced to get the vaxx happen to coincide with the “ideal” population levels listed on the Georgia guide stones. Personally, myself, my wife and my friend all of us 25+ year healthcare professionals are refusing to get the vaxx.

          • Thank you for your comment.

            I hope you don’t mind, but I sent it to a doctor friend of ours who sent back this response:

            “Patients should be fully anti-coagulated and receive full dose aspirin. The failure to anticoagulate is associated with persistent hypoxemia and death to to micro- and macro-pulmonary emboli

            pmc”

            Hope this helps and I hope you comment here often SF.

            • Thank you. All of my pts are on subQ heparin. After your physician friend’s comment I wonder if they should be on a heparin drip instead. Such decisions are above my pay grade. I was in healthcare in the early 80’s when AIDS first came out. We didn’t know what caused it. We didn’t know if our ppe would protect us. Hell, we didn’t even have a name for it. Last year when we were struggling to take care of our pt load it reminded me of those days. I have seen worse things as a nurse than I ever saw in the Marines.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*