Tucker Carlson deals with the Gatineau Quebec Stasi raid and MUCH more of import: Links 1, February 23, 2021

1. BREAKING: house of commons passes motion declaring china’s actions against uyghurs a genocide

The House of Commons has passed the motion declaring China’s actions against the Uyghurs as a genocide.

The vote was 266 in favour, and 0 against.

The Liberal cabinet abstained.

Vote result: The @CPC_HQ
#OppositionMotion (Religious minorities in China) was adopted as amended. #cdnpoli

(The Trudeau cabinet abstained. Fascinating.)

2. Supreme Court Clarence Thomas appears to be the only judge left who seems to be concerned about the actual law as he dissents from the abdication of responsability of the Supreme Court over Pennsylvania’s unconstitutional election handling.

Supreme CourtJustice Clarence Thomas issued a dissenting opinion regarding the high court’s decision not to take up a case challenging the Pennsylvania Nov. 3 election results.

The court on Monday announced it won’t take up lawsuits challenging a Pennsylvania state court decision that relaxed ballot-integrity measures, including a move to extend the ballot-receipt deadline during the November election by three days due to the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus. Former President Donald Trump and Pennsylvania’s GOP urged the court to take up a review of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling.

“This is not a prescription for confidence,” Thomas wrote on Monday, adding that “changing the rules in the middle of the game is bad enough.” Thomas, considered by many to be the most conservative justice, said the court should have granted a review.

3. Last NIght’s Tucker Carlson: Naomi Wolf suddenly in favour of liberty, and Canada now a leader in global tyranny

VladTepesBlog covered the story in Gatineau that Tucker touched on around January 21, 2021 and our translated, titled video is below:

4. Brooklyn lawyers who were facing life behind bars for ‘throwing a Molotov cocktail into an NYPD car during a George Floyd protest’ are quietly offered a plea deal

Two Brooklyn lawyers who were facing life behind bars for allegedly throwing a Molotov cocktail into an empty NYPD car during a George Floyd protest have been quietly offered a plea deal. 

On May 29, Urooj Rahman and Colinford Mattis were arrested after a protest in Fort Greene, Brooklyn. Cops say that Rahman crafted a Molotov cocktail out of a Bud Light bottle and threw it into an NYPD vehicle, then hopped into a getaway car being driven by Mattis.  

It was caught on surveillance cameras and she was even photographed in their minivan holding the homemade bomb. 

They were then hit with a seven-charge indictment which alleged use of explosives, arson, arson conspiracy and use of an explosive to commit a felony. 

They both pleaded not guilty – not because they claim they didn’t do it, but because they don’t think the charges are called for. 

They said all they did was destroy property and attend a protest and that they were being made an example of by the very police they were protesting against.

(What this site used to, and still refers to as selective enforcement is better understood to be a dialectic process of application or non application of law to achieve a specific outcome, always moving to the left. This would be the same as calling CNN or CBC “fake news” when in reality it is enemy propaganda.)

5. Strict New Rules for Travel to Canada Began Today

(Once again we see with the use of terms like “Essential” that the Covid virus can tell the difference between Kulak travel, [Any reason you might need to go somewhere for work or pleasure or personal reasons], and Politburo reasons, which the article refers to as “essential travel”. Clearly they are exempt because this killer virus clearly won’t infect them and make them a threat to the rest of us in the same way it will to a person who went somewhere to visit a dying relative.)

Strict new rules for anyone travelling to Canada came into effect today.

As of February 22, anyone flying into Canada will be subject to a PCR-style test for COVID-19 after they land. Travellers also are required to have arranged a three-night stay at a designated quarantine hotel near the Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal or Calgary airport. (Test results taken within 72 hours of a scheduled flight also must be presented at the airport someone is flying to Canada from.)

Fliers who take their Canadian airport tests and are negative for the virus can finish out their mandatory, 14-day quarantine at home or at a designated quarantine site and will be subject to increased surveillance. […]

Ottawa last Monday started requiring all non-essential travellers crossing into Canada by land to show a negative COVID-19 test taken within 72 hours. Starting today (Feb. 22), non-essential travellers granted exemptions and allowed into the country at land crossings also be required to take a COVID-19 test at the border as well as at the end of their 14-day quarantine. That rule will apply initially only to border crossings that have the proper equipment, and will then be expanded.

(We should add of course that illegals who walk into Canada at Roxham Rd. Quebec or anywhere else like that are not subject to any of this or any of the expenses detailed at the article linked above, and we still cannot determine if daily flights are coming in to Canada from China with none of this being applied to the passengers. Which means in all likelihood that is the case)


Thank you Rich, Richard, M., ML., Wrath of Khan, MarcusZ1967, Johnny U., ET., Tama, Sassy and ALL who are managing to keep watching despite the potential PTSD the deep sense of looming cynicism may cause.

Its good to know the FBI has its priorities straight

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

7 Replies to “Tucker Carlson deals with the Gatineau Quebec Stasi raid and MUCH more of import: Links 1, February 23, 2021”

  1. 1. Communists have no value for human life. It is to serve the hive like an ant. Genocide can be slaughter, sterilisation, selling body parts, famine, indoctrination, and sheer overwhelming expendable numbers in war. For the Socialists in the West, this is a clean and well ordered society that feeds them from their cheap labor, while their decadence makes them weak and unable to manufacture their own diapers. Until then, Rainbow-morality divides the nation to have nothing to defend.

    The Canadian Conservatives, called a spade a spade. This is problematic.

  2. 2. “Before the Law stands a doorkeeper on guard. To this doorkeeper there comes a man from the country who begs for admittance to the Law. But the doorkeeper says that he cannot admit the man at the moment. The man, on reflection, asks if he will be allowed, then, to enter later. ‘It is possible,’ answers the doorkeeper, ‘but not at this moment.’ Since the door leading into the Law stands open as usual and the doorkeeper steps to one side, the man bends down to peer through the entrance. When the doorkeeper sees that, he laughs and says: ‘If you are so strongly tempted, try to get in without my permission. But note that I am powerful. And I am only the lowest doorkeeper. From hall to hall keepers stand at every door, one more powerful than the other. Even the third of these has an aspect that even I cannot bear to look at.’ These are difficulties which the man from the country has not expected to meet, the Law, he thinks, should be accessible to every man and at all times, but when he looks more closely at the doorkeeper in his furred robe, with his huge pointed nose and long, thin, Tartar beard, he decides that he had better wait until he gets permission to enter. The doorkeeper gives him a stool and lets him sit down at the side of the door. There he sits waiting for days and years. He makes many attempts to be allowed in and wearies the doorkeeper with his importunity. The doorkeeper often engages him in brief conversation, asking him about his home and about other matters, but the questions are put quite impersonally, as great men put questions, and always conclude with the statement that the man cannot be allowed to enter yet. The man, who has equipped himself with many things for his journey, parts with all he has, however valuable, in the hope of bribing the doorkeeper. The doorkeeper accepts it all, saying, however, as he takes each gift: ‘I take this only to keep you from feeling that you have left something undone.’ During all these long years the man watches the doorkeeper almost incessantly. He forgets about the other doorkeepers, and this one seems to him the only barrier between himself and the Law. In the first years he curses his evil fate aloud; later, as he grows old, he only mutters to himself. He grows childish, and since in his prolonged watch he has learned to know even the fleas in the doorkeeper’s fur collar, he begs the very fleas to help him and to persuade the doorkeeper to change his mind. Finally his eyes grow dim and he does not know whether the world is really darkening around him or whether his eyes are only deceiving him. But in the darkness he can now perceive a radiance that streams immortally from the door of the Law. Now his life is drawing to a close. Before he dies, all that he has experienced during the whole time of his sojourn condenses in his mind into one question, which he has never yet put to the doorkeeper. He beckons the doorkeeper, since he can no longer raise his stiffening body. The doorkeeper has to bend far down to hear him, for the difference in size between them has increased very much to the man’s disadvantage. ‘What do you want to know now?’ asks the doorkeeper, ‘you are insatiable.’ ‘Everyone strives to attain the Law,’ answers the man, ‘how does it come about, then, that in all these years no one has come seeking admittance but me?’ The doorkeeper perceives that the man is at the end of his strength and that his hearing is failing, so he bellows in his ear: ‘No one but you could gain admittance through this door, since this door was intended only for you. I am now going to shut it.” – Franz Kafka, The Trial

    • As the heavy door slid slowly to closure, the man’s fingers, painfully knarled, filled the remaining gap. And the doorkeeper stopped.

      “Then tell me what this Law is. Is it the Law of the Stone? The Law of the Animal? Or The Law for Man?” He pleaded.

      “Which Face!” the doorkeeper retorted, vexed that the door was not sealing.

      “Which visage? I am nearly blind!” He kept his hand fixed. “I have no face of any matter, and no face to save.”

      “Oh? Now it’s pity, you want? A last drink to your desires? Am I that merciful? And should the next and the next doorkeepers, each stronger, grant you an increasing pity, that you should proceed to prostrate yourself before the Law as the most unworthy worthyman of them all! Your dying-wish, to be acquainted? No. That’s final. Your youth did not sway me, so why should your wretchedness?”

      Hoarsely, the countryman whispered, “stones obey the Law of Nature, animals the Law of The Jungle. What Law am I to serve, except Mankind’s, so I may honor our Creator and compare what is written. To know myself.”

      The door did not yield.

      He continued, “I did not come in the name of The Prophet, or The Great Civilization, or even compared against others of Preferential Rank… but for the confirmation of Right or Wrong. For I merely want judgement from Justice and Truth and nothing more”

      The doorkeeper, sneered. “Even though you are consumed by decay, you would still serve an Author who’s the Best of all Liars, the best of all Kings and the Best of all Lovers?”

      “The Law is The Law. Command and obey. We cannot change this.”

      “Yes, this thought reasures you. To remove accountability, your responsibility, and will feed and clothes you all your days. So sayeth the Law!”

      The doorway, viewed from the other side, had always looked directly into his heart.

      “The Law is Universal. For All Time!”

      “And yet, you do not know of it.” The doorkeeper look disdainfully at the twisted fingers barring closure.

      “I will know it, when I see it!”

      At this, the doorkeeper yanked his head back, and shouted, “He will know it when he sees it.” and the voices repeated and repeated this same call, again and again, and all the doors flew open.

      Half stumbling, the countryman looked up at the far wall, clear as daylight, hidden from view all his life.


      As it was written And had never changed.

  3. 2 – The Counter Revolution is gaining momentum, it is a slow process and we will see many more actions against the rule of law before we succeed in returning to a First World legal system, or a legal system like the First World use to have.

    • The Law all over the west has been bastardized for over half a century and the removal of these cancerous parts will take over a century. What was easy to place will be terribly difficult to remove(like ALL laws) and even the neutrals will fight back with the Left here on bleeding heart grounds while the Christians will be made to feel unChristian by supporting their removal. You must know how the enemy works as it knows all of our virtues and uses them against us daily. It knows that even as they murder us we will be ethically hamstrung in doing likewise back until a real war occurs and even then we will not have the sense to fight as does it as it knows we cannot win a war of extermination as we are too ethically bound and hence, weak to win.
      Only Germany could have beaten the USSR as the west never could even when it had a nuclear advantage. If you wish to find out how communists fight then study the Eastern Front or even Vietnam/Korea as in the former both sides fought the same way there with very little quarter given while the horror stories of the latter two abound (my uncle discovered two gunship pilots who had been forced down and skinned alive)

      • Christians are taught ‘first for the Jew and then for the Gentile;’ and Hell to the Unbelievers.

        Those having more Equal Rights than you in Heaven and Earth – because they told you so. It’s one Law for them and one Law for you.

        And what inbetweeners, (who are weak before the strong, and strong before the weak), can save a Nation?

        For they will submit to the first as God’s Will, and enable the latter as God’s Love.

        Apologies shall reign supreme. And never will.

        Races Blessed by their seeds and yours not.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.