Two mRNA gene therapy skeptical videos and a great reminder from Computing forever of why we fight for truth and freedom

1. Salty Cracker video on pregnant doctor who pushed the mRNA gene therapy shot, miscarries baby

2. The following video is very good. They look at the legal definition, and the medical definition by top peer reviewed medical journals on the definition of vaccine, and why this gene therapy is simply not a vaccine, but is an experimental mRNA treatment developed by a company that never ever made a vaccine. They also explain how certain laws are suspended during an emergency orders act, which explains a lot.

The science definition requires a vaccine to be a killed or attenuated live virus and the medical definition is it must confer immunity to a disease and make one unable to spread it. This mRNA gene therapy treatment does not fit any of the definitions.

It is by Dr. Joseph Mercola. If the YT copy of this video goes down please click the link above.

3. Computing Forever on the state of the world today for the West thanks to Wuhan Flu emergency measures. Its actually a very beautiful and valuable view, and very encouraging at that.

Thank you Miss Piggy, Oz-Rita, and Hellequin GB for all the work you do and these links for this post.

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

23 Replies to “Two mRNA gene therapy skeptical videos and a great reminder from Computing forever of why we fight for truth and freedom”

    • This Traitor Trudeau have to go period!!, this forcing COVID hotels , worse then North Korea!!, you have right to travel overseas to my family in Germany, this is outrageous, !!, people have to wake up ..

  1. 2- If this doctor is correct in his observations then this massive, deadly fraud deserves history’s largest class-action lawsuit. It would justifiably be for trillions of dollars, or else enough to bankrupt forever Bezos, Gates, Fauci, Zuckerberg, big pharma and every other crook who has perpetrated it. But it begs questions:
    -where are the thousands of other doctors to speak up? If I can understand everything he said then every medical pro certainly must know the mRNA gene therapy treatment is wrong.
    -so are doctors afraid, lazy, or not as qualified as they should be?
    -if we trace this fraud to its roots what does it mean for the coup against PT that used the Wuhan bug to alter voting practices?
    -if the mRNA therapies have no designs on measuring immunity or infection, then wtf are we doing, and what are our doctors thinking?
    -if no liability exists for innocent people who are maimed or killed, and public servants agreed to such “deals” with these companies, how can we find out who, specifically agreed to such deals? Because it was a fake emergency based on false models?
    -why are countries all over the world getting sucked into using this mRNA gene therapy if it is experimental and of unknown efficacy? Surely there exists common sense in some smart peoples somewhere?
    -if it’s not a vaccine by definition, and pharmas are not protected from liability when injecting an mRNA poison that kills or maims, why hasn’t a lawyer sued for a victim using this premise?

  2. “Israel: BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech] vaccine, preprint”

    Initial real world evidence for lower viral load of individuals who have been vaccinated by BNT162b2

    Abstract

    One of the key questions regarding COVID19 vaccines is whether they can reduce viral shedding. To date, Israel vaccinated substantial parts of the adult population, which enables extracting real world signals. The vaccination rollout started on Dec 20th 2020, utilized mainly the BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech] vaccine, and focused on individuals who are 60 years or older. By now, more than 75% of the individuals of this age group have been at least 14 days after the first dose, compared to 25% of the individuals between ages 40-60 years old.

    Here, we traced the Ct [cycle threshold] value distribution of 16,297 positive qPCR tests in our lab between Dec 1st to Jan 31st that came from these two age groups. As we do not have access to the vaccine status of each test, our hypothesis was that if vaccines reduce viral load, we should see a difference in the Ct values between these two age groups in late January but not before. Consistent with this hypothesis, until Jan 15th, we did not find any statistically significant differences in the average Ct value between the groups.

    In stark contrast, our results in the last two weeks of January show a significant weakening in the average Ct value of 60+ individuals to the 40-60 group. To further corroborate these results, we also used a series nested linear models to explain the Ct values of the positive tests. This analysis favored a model that included an interaction between age and the late January time period, consistent with the effect of vaccination. We then used demographic data and the daily vaccination rates to estimate the effect of vaccination on viral load reduction.

    Our estimate suggests that vaccination reduces the viral load by 1.6x to 20x in individuals who are positive for SARS-CoV-2. This estimate might improve after more individuals receive the second dose. Taken together, our findings indicate vaccination is not only important for individual’s protection but can reduce transmission.

    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.08.21251329v1

    • From private correspondence:

      “BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes the SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike, modified by two proline mutations to lock it in the prefusion conformation. A 2-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against COVID-19 in persons 16 years of age or older.

      “This study did not analyze results by age group and is predominantly looking at single dose vaccinees. Thus, the investigators anticipate even greater reduction in viral load after a second vaccination in those individuals who become infected with SARS-CoV-2.

      “The results are promising because viral load has been correlated with transmissibility of the virus and severity of disease. They suggest that vaccination will protect both the vaccinees from becoming severely ill and those around them from becoming infected.”
      ………
      People with a history of anaphylactic shock to ANY antigen – not only meds, but also bee stings, latex, shellfish, horses – should probably be EXCLUDED for now.

      At a MINIMUM, they should bring their own epinephrine auto-injectors and remain under observation for an hour.

      • my doc advises rather being in a hospital setting for the vaccine because personnel have experience with performing emergency tracheomtomy for anaphylaxis that is slow to respond to multiple epinephrine injections.

        • I’ve learned, Yucki, that there seldom is gospel. This is why I ask questions and try to avoid making conclusions. We’ve all been burned–especially when someone sounds credible…

          • Questions are VITAL.
            Malca says what I’ve heard from others: vax in a setting equipped for severe allergic reactions.

            YOU, Johnny, are allergic to shellfish, right?
            ~ Let the lab rats use up this first batch of shots. They’ll have to be reformulated anyway.

  3. Where did the flu go vid above very interesting. I’ve been asking myself this question for ages since I’ve not had a cold or anything since before the pandemic. First time in my life. Does this mean I’ve been protected by an interferon response even though I’ve been asymptomatic throughout? Can there be an interferon response without symptoms?

    Weird. As horrible as all of this is, one cannot help but think that once the world “…sciences the crap…” out of this we will be absolutely leaps ahead in our understanding, akin to what happens when a species experiences a genetic leap in adaptation to its hostile environment.

    • I’m a ZDoggie groupie.
      Popular teacher among medical professionals. (Nurses seem to be especially crazy about him.)
      He adjusts to new data, brings informed guests, asks the right questions. Not afraid to say, “I was wrong. Here’s why.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*