1. The New Covid is now SEVENTY PERCENT more contagious! And for the same low low price!
‘Show us the evidence’: Scientists call for clarity on claim that new Covid-19 variant strain is 70% more contagious
Boris Johnson was last night urged to publish clear evidence of the Covid data he used to cancel Christmas for millions.
The Prime Minister has warned the new variant of coronavirus may be up to 70 per cent more transmissible than previous strains and could overwhelm the NHS.
But last night one scientist demanded greater transparency over the number that shut down swathes of the UK.
Carl Heneghan, Professor of Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University’s Nuffield Department of Primary Care, expressed scepticism over the 70 per cent figure.
2. A rather important bit of evidence tampering in the November 3 election
BREAKING THE LAW: The Michigan Secretary of State directed the county clerks to delete all their electronic voting records. Previous years electric records from 2018 and 2016 are still intact. By law all records are to be preserved for at least 2 years.
— Bruce Porter, Jr. (@NetworksManager) December 22, 2020
The evidence: Antrim County Forensics Report
3. Sweden blocks travel from Denmark over fears of new virus strain
5. The communist terrorist who helped Eritrea separate from Ethiopia and become a communist state, and hid a cholera epidemic, and somehow is now the head of WHO, assures us that the new strain of the virus is no more deadly and other attributes to which he makes claim. Consider his track record for accuracy on Covid 19 before accepting these claims as factual.
Please note how the definition of Herd Immunity has been recently changed to reflect the WHO narrative on vaccine use:
This is 1984.
WHO changes definition of herd immunity.
2019 definition and 2020 definition. Spot the difference… pic.twitter.com/kweKDaztQv
— Simon Dolan #KBF (@simondolan) December 22, 2020
Thank you Malca, M., Wrath of Khan, Johnny U., Yucki, Rich, Richard, and MANY more who continue to stand firm against the tides of contradictory materials disguised as information.
Per Simon Dolan and the revision of Herd Immunity to reflect not that which is naturally occurring but that which is achieved only via vaccines: This is also the stated position of Dr. Deborah Birx that she hawked this past Spring during an interview with Judge Janine Pirro.
Birx dismissed outright the KNOWN benefits of naturally occurring herd immunity when JJ presented it as an inevitable palliative and instead Birx suggested that only a vaccine effects herd immunity. Birx is a LIAR. And we do well to suspect her motives when she denies the science upon which her profession stakes its claims to authority.
Birx is a modern day Jezebel whose efforts seem more geared to destruction than to healing, and for that she needs to be shunned.
She is evidently using the WHO revised definition.
Everyone here does realize that mumps on a plane is more virulent? If I were unable to take that vaccine, my air travel would depend on fellow passengers being healthy through lack of exposure, preveious infection, or vaccine.
“Incompetence causes more problems than malice.”
Anaphylactic reactions to both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines: they’re still sorting it out, a little too casual IMO. Mustn’t frighten the subjects!
Anaphylaxis is extremely rare for vaccines, maybe one in a million. It’s far more common for other drugs – like penicillin. So what’s going on?
“Pfizer’s and Moderna’s clinical trials of the vaccines, which involved tens of thousands of people, did not find serious adverse events caused by the vaccine. But both studies excluded people with a history of allergies to components of the COVID-19 vaccines; Pfizer also excluded those who previously had a severe adverse reaction from any vaccine.
People with previous allergic reactions to food or drugs were not excluded but may have been underrepresented.”
The suspect agent may be polyethylene glycol (PEG), used as a binder for the messenger RNA (mRNA). It’s a very common ingredient in everything from toothpaste to laxatives.
“As much as 72% of people have at least some antibodies against PEGs…presumably as a result of exposure to cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. About 7% have a level that may be high enough to predispose them to anaphylactic reactions…”
That's a LOT of people!
Discussion in the article linked above, a couple of gifted Hungarians thrash it out. One of them raises another issue:
“Szebeni … notes that both mRNA vaccines require two shots, and he worries anti-PEG antibodies triggered by the first shot could increase the risk of an allergic reaction to the second or to PEGylated drugs.”