A sterling example of what sharia law is, and how it works

One of the most persistent themes of this site, is trying to assist people in understanding that sharia law, is not like a Western formalized form of law with any kind of equality, and more importantly, MUCH more importantly, not even any kind of due process. Ultimately life and death decisions are made by the guy with the biggest hat.

And all it takes is an accusation. But it is critical to understand why a given accusation will be acted on, or not.

Any accusation that increases the authority and degree of Islam will be acted on, if at all possible. While the exact same accusation or ‘crime’ would not be acted on, if it does not increase the authority of Islam or worse, diminishes its stature, which is itself a crime in Islam.

It doesn’t take a court or anything so formal or grandiose. It just takes a muslim to make the accusation. Say, Blasphemy or adultery or any kind of behaviour where a non-muslim acts like an equal to a muslim like drinking out of a muslim-only well for instance (Asia Bibi) and then a cleric to legitimize the accusation, and then a rabid mob to carry out the murder of the accused. Although sometimes there is a stay in prison and sometimes a sort of trial. But there is no due process. The best an accused can hope for, is massive foreign attention and anger which could result in sanctions.

The example below shows how sharia law works. It was this way in the Islamic State, for years even before it was declared to be such, (although our video proofs of that were taken down. but some where even done by French journalists.) It is this way in much or most of Afghanistan as we saw with a woman who was thrown off a roof, beaten, burned to death and thrown into a ravine of sorts because she was accused of something by an imam who really wanted her killed for some other reason.

Sharia isn’t just something we have to resist. Its the reason people go to war to stop, or perhaps more fairly, to protect a legal system like the one we inherited from the British.

It is also noteworthy that communism has pretty much the same system of justice. And for pretty much the same reasons. You have an opinion, say something or do something that diminishes the authority of communists or communism in the area, you will face court or gulags etc. depending on the stage of communist implementation.

For communism’s equivalent of blasphemy, insulting the leader in any way whatsoever in North Korea, you go to a slave labour camp for three generations. Your grandchildren will be in a camp because you used a part of a page of a magazine in which there is a photo of any of the leaders of North Korea to make a cigarette.

There is little daylight between leftism/communism and Islam.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

9 Replies to “A sterling example of what sharia law is, and how it works”

  1. “The cruel children of a lonely god.” {Hilaire Belloc}

    or The cruel comrades of the god of state.

    It matters what or who you believe in.

  2. Islam embodies pretty much everything that we in the West think of as evil. Like, sneaking up behind somebody, stabbing him in the back, and stealing his money is frowned upon in the West but is considered holy in Islam as long as your victim is an Infidel. Same with having sex with nine-year-old girls. They actually believe in bullying, for Christ’s sake, and that the weak should be subjugated by the strong and that independent thought is hated by God. Muslims think that women should be severely punished for the crime of being raped and that she is only worth half as much as a man…

    I cannot for the life of me understand why Islam is not totally banned across the civilized world…

    • Because the left stopped us teaching the facts of history, instead teaching the lies of the left.

  3. The only way to stop the rot of violent savages is to force them out of our society. But no one is willing to do that, are they? All the meek little honkies are too busy wringing their hands and worrying about seeming racist. That’s a shame, because these primitive apes will make a point of erasing our kind from their history books after they wipe us out.

    Close the borders. Expel the barbarians. Defend the motherland, protect our people. Exile the globalist scum who started this invasion. That is how to restore peace and prosperity to the west.

    • The tide is turning but people don’t see it, in the long run we will win and remain free.

  4. Where is this video from, and when was it produced?

    I was also confused by this passage: “It was this way in the Islamic State, for years even before it was declared to be such,”. Does this refer to al-Qaeda in Syria?
    The way they terrorized the population was based on a document called “the management of savagery”. It was written by an al-Qaeda operative, and describes the intimidation tactics they used in Yemen when the locals revolted against their tyranny and mismanagement.
    There are some parallels with communist approaches, but it’s more Shining Path than North-Korea imho. Shining Path had the same problem with the peasantry in the lands they controlled, so they cut feotuses from pregnant women, inserted a dead dogs and hung them from lampposts.

    Btw what does this refer to: “although our video proofs of that were taken down. but some where even done by French journalists”?

    • Years ago we translated an AMAZING video by two Frenc journalists that got permission to go to a part of Syria that was controlled by Al Nusra front or whatever it was called. They were running a total sharia state. The reporters followed them around all over as they closed down social businesses, threw kids out of places with games, punished women for things, men for things, burned booze and cigarettes and general bullying according to sharia.

      I dearly wish I could find that video. It was very revealing and important.

      A couple of years after it became the Islamic State of course. But that video had HUGE pressure on it not to be shown. There must have been some truths there, I think the Obama admin did not want seen. We have done other videos that disappeared mysteriously and without explanation, even from Bitchute actually.

      The Bulgarian one about US funding for The Islamic State with interviews with Turkish and other generals who were not onside with it all.

      That one I repost from time to time.

      https://www.minds.com/media/681650542107172874