1. France at least presents the illusion of a fight back against Islamic dominance in many areas
At long last, and not until after the percentage of Muslims in the population passed the point of no return, the French government has decided to do something about “radicalization”. The initiative seems the very essence of futility, since Islam is firmly established in dozens or hundreds of banlieues, from which it can never be dislodged without the use of massive and lethal violence.
Many thanks to MissPiggy for translating this article from Le Journal du Dimanche:
Fight against Islamism: The plan extended to the entire country
November 27, 201
(Please read the translation over at Gates of Vienna)
(When selective enforcement is always selected one way, it could be said to be the implementation of Marcuse’s “Repressive Tolerance”. From Stephen Coughlin and Rich Higgins’ paper on strategies and tactics of the left:
“Repressive Tolerance” lays out the operational design of Marxist critical theory applied to America. Marcuse did this through the arbitrary division of tolerance into two forms; liberating and repressive, for the purpose of subjecting toler- ance to a dialectical process of negation.
Under Marcuse’s regime, (universal) tolerance becomes intolerance to non-conforming (particular) views. When Marcuse stated in the second paragraph of “Repressive Tolerance” that he was “fully aware that, at present, no power, no authority, no government exists which would translate liberating tolerance into practice,”184 he was declaring that America, along with its Western Judeo-Christian culture, was repressive and, hence, rightfully the object of negation precisely because it was Western and Judeo-Christian. With his full explanation, one can see the dialectical intent ofaufheben—[…]
A few pages later:
“Repressive Tolerance” weaponized critical theory for use against America and the West. For Marcuse, the repressive tolerance of America was, and still is, in need of negation by a liberating toler- ance—Die Amerikanische Kultur muss aufgehoben werden.
It is worth considering the strategic level when examining the tactics and implementation of the tactics we see on this and other websites day to day. The reason is to not be controlled opposition.)
After a five-month investigation into the annual Al Quds hatefest against the Jewish people, Toronto Police have opted to lay no charges.
“The investigation into the Al Quds Day protest back in June of this year has concluded and no charges have been laid,” said Toronto Police spokesman Meaghan Gray this week….
Mayor John Tory said more than once before the protest that he would not tolerate, ignore or condone any rally that incites hatred and/or violence against groups or persons.
His spokesman Lawvin Hadisi reiterated that message Wednesday.
Yet it seems that it was all just talk.
I was at the Al Quds rally on June 1 — along with 100 cops — when 500 Al Quds supporters occupied the public space outside the University Ave. courthouse and subsequently blocked University Ave. to march north.
This was all done without a permit.
3. ‘F*** the Jews, Kill the Jews’ – Senior Rabbi Beaten in Khan’s London
A senior rabbi was left bleeding on the ground after two teens brutally beat him while shouting “fuck the Jews” and “kill the Jews” in London.
On the same evening as the London Bridge terrorist attack, a rabbi who was visiting London was beaten in the Amhurst Park area of Stamford Hill, Hackney.
Two teenagers attacked the rabbi at 9:45 on Friday night, a time in which orthodox Jews refrain from using telephones.
The two youths shouted, “fuck the Jews” and “kill the Jews” while beating the rabbi, according to the Shomrim, a Jewish neighbourhood watch group.
The identities of the apparently antisemitic teens remain unknown at the time of writing of this report.
The rabbi has since flown back to Israel.
(What we learn from this is that the most important thing in a Nazi like, antisemitic beating of a Jewish man, is that we must protect the motive and group identity of the attackers. Please see item 2. The JC also does not offer a description)
4. Farage Demands Whole-Life Prison Terms for Terrorists Infected with ‘Jihadi Virus’
(Hard to believe Farage actually says something about this at all. Refreshing.)
Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage laid down the law to representatives of other political parties in a Sunday election debate, slamming “liberal elite” weakness and demanding serious action against radical Islamic terrorists.
“Well, we all express our condolences, but nobody apologises, apologises for the fact the liberal elite have given us a ridiculous sentencing system,” Farage began when the subject of the London Bridge terror attack by freed terrorist Usman Khan was raised at the ITV debate between representatives of the Brexit Party, Conservative Party, Labour, Liberal Democrats, Scottish National Party (SNP), Greens, and Welsh separatist Plaid Cymru.
“I don’t care if these people were in jail for six years or twelve years — if you have committed mass murder, or planned to commit mass murder, you’re not just an ordinary criminal: you’ve got the virus of jihadism,” Farage continued.
“And I think these people should never, ever be let out of prison, unless we’re absolutely convinced they do not have the jihadi virus — but, of course, political correctness stops us from doing this,” he lamented.
(Of course he is still wrong. You cannot ever win this thing treating a military problem as a law and order one. The cost alone of housing enemy soldiers in your midst will break the system and one could easily make the case that this is what happened in the London Bridge event. They just can’t afford to keep the guy inside on more than one level. Cost in money, but having a guy like that likely radicalizing other inmates and taking over aspects of the system. We don’t ever win this thing till we treat it as the military or alternatively intelligence problem that it is.)
5. This woman asks a question about the benefits of Islamic immigration to the UK. The answers are both revealing and at this stage, brave.
https://twitter.com/FrederickFredr3/status/1201189477533835267
Click through to read the responses.
6. Pakistani police charge hundreds of protesters with treason
Pakistan’s police say it has charged hundreds of students and activists with sedition for making insulting remarks against its military at a protest demanding the lifting of a ban on political activity at universities.
Sunday’s move by police in the city of Lahore to pursue treason cases against the demonstrators came hours before a tweet from Prime Minister Imran Khan suggesting he would end the 1984 ban on student unions.
Amnesty International condemned the move in a statement Sunday. It asked Pakistan to drop any charges and release those arrested following Friday’s rally in Lahore.
Police said the protesters had chanted against “state institutions,” a term referring to the country’s powerful military. They said the rally was attended by between 250 and 300 people, all of whom would be charged.
7. Corbyn offers contrast to gel Farage.
Corbyn: Terrorists Shouldn’t ‘Necessarily’ Serve Full Prison Terms
In the wake of the deadly London Bridge terror attack, far-left Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn said that terrorists should “not necessarily” serve their full prison sentences.
Corbyn, who has a history of sympathising with IRA terrorists, said that he believes the length of prison sentences for terrorists “depends on the circumstances” and “what they’ve done in prison”.
Asked whether convicted terrorists should “not necessarily” serve their full prison terms, Corbyn told Sky News “not necessarily, no”.
Six of the eight terrorist plotters who were jailed along with London Bridge attacker Usman Khan in 2012 have also been freed from prison, it has emerged.
The nine jihadists were members of an al-Qaeda-inspired cell which plotted to blow up the London Stock Exchange and kill Boris Johnson.
One is still in prison, another was convicted for a further terror plot and Khan is dead – leaving six back on the streets, it is believed.
Three of the nine – Khan, Mohammad Shahjahan and Nazam Hussein – were initially handed indefinite prison terms, but the trio won an appeal in 2013 which changed them to fixed sentences.
Allowing their appeal, former press inquiry chair Lord Justice Leveson found they had been ‘wrongly characterised’ as more dangerous than the others.
Khan was released in December 2018 after serving half of his fixed sentence – and the other two have also been freed, The Sun on Sunday reported.
Thank you Wrath of Khan, M., Richard, Yucki, Sassy, C. and others who have contributed to this post. Some interesting material in the oven that hopefully will be released today.
4 – Reinstate the Deant Penalty and execute the terrorists withing 6 months of the attack. Problem of recidivism solved.
Well,here they are. And I have to say if I saw them on the street I would go the other way.
Is that racist of me to eschew men that obliviously do not wish to assimilate our culture