A new look at a 2013 video on the weaponization of the term, “Islamophobia”

Posted on by

This is a new and detailed analysis of an OSCE event in 2013 in Warsaw, where an attempt to extract a definition of Islamophobia from Islamic (OIC) sources as well as the Marxist think tank, Runnymede, was made with no success but a great deal of obfuscation. Why would that be?

This is an important video and shows the Marxist effort along with Islamic, to leave terms undefined in order to make them better and more broad weapons against all non-Muslims. And for that matter, all non-Marxists with the term, “Hate speech”.

More on that later though. For now, please take a few minutes and watch this.

Anyone wishing to develop a solid understanding of these tactics so well exemplified in this video, may wish to download Stephen Coughlin’s document on understanding the left here.

Stephen Coughlin, and Ned May from Gates of Vienna, do manage to show the extent of the dishonesty of this influential international agency. Also please note in the video, the book used by this body which contains the logos of the UN and EU, as well as the OSCE.

(For some reason, D.tube videos are not playing on Safari tonight. Please try this on Chrome or possibly Brave.)

Direct link:

https://d.tube/v/vladtepesblog/QmStwfxYUeTqgE53F6g9hb94HZi3zpEZZ48bRRTep3mk52

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

4 Replies to “A new look at a 2013 video on the weaponization of the term, “Islamophobia””

  3. Anything that hints at mischief towards the world-view of
    islam
    Socialism and
    LGBTQ+,
    Is a phobia.

    In other words, manhood is a crime.

  4. Robin Richardson quotes Karl Marx “Human beings make their own history.”

    I quote Sayyid Qutb, “Islam in relation to all these jahili societies can be described in one sentence: It considers all these societies unIslamic and illegal.”

    “Our first task is to replace this Jahiliyyah with Islamic ideas and traditions. This can not be brought about by agreeing with Jahiliyyah and going along a few steps with it from the very beginning, as some us think we ought to do, for this will simply mean that from the very beginning we have accepted defeat.”

    “No political system or material power should put hindrances in the way of preaching Islam. It should leave every individual free to accept or reject, and if someone wants to accept it, it should not prevent him or fight against him. If someone does this, then it is the duty of Islam to fight against him until either he is killed or until he declares his submission.”

    Robin Richardson said “Some of us want to be on the side of those being harmed and hurt.”

    Yes, some of do want to be on the side of those being harmed and hurt.