Not liking a piece of cloth is RACIST in Denmark

If its racist to object to someone wearing a cloth across their face, then its racist to object to an open or concealed carry. In fact, carrying a gun is more tightly a part of American culture than is wearing a face cloth in islamic culture. So how can one be racist and the other not?

Of course the answer is neither is. A culture has a right to set standards for itself in law. If Saudi Arabia can mandate a face cloth, then we can mandate not having one. Especially when the islamic culture insists on moving here and not the other way around.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

16 Replies to “Not liking a piece of cloth is RACIST in Denmark”

  1. The modern idea (As of the 1980’s) of an official “Halal Certification” and the wearing the Hijab (As of the late 1950’s) is something NEW! The act of introducing new ideas into Islam is always supposed to be forbidden, this is called a “Biddah Heresy”. Biddah is an invention or innovation by Moslems, that has never been previously mentioned anywhere in Islamic writings, or not in the koran or the Hadiths or any other ancient Islamic writings.
    Halal certification is a Jizyah Tax scheme to separate gullible food companies and consumers from their money, and as a means to finance Jihad. Commercial certification was not required in Mohammad’s time, or anytime in the last 1350 years and is not required now.
    But notice how no Moslem cleric or imam talks about this need for certification or the fact that Mohammad had told them they could eat any food, as long as they mentioned “allah’s” name.

    “Biddah” is Haram and considered as heresy, it is an innovation in Islam, it is the invention, creation or addition of any religious matter which was not (originally) found in Islam. Therefore, Islam warns against it and invalidates any religious deed which does not originate from the koran and the Sunnah. Muhammad says in this respect: “He who innovates something that is not in agreement with our matter (religion), will have it rejected.”

    This is because innovation in religion is an opposition to Islam; it implies that our religion is incomplete and imperfect with regards to the matters of worship. Shaikh Ibn ‘Uthaimeen says: “Innovation entails the adoption of dangerous ways”

    “Biddah” is Haram and considered as heresy, it is an innovation in Islam, it is the invention, creation or addition of any religious matter which was not (originally) found in Islam. Therefore, Islam warns against it and invalidates any religious deed which does not originate from the koran and the Sunnah.

    Muhammad said in this respect: “He who innovates something that is not in agreement with our matter (religion), will have it rejected. This is because innovation in religion is an opposition to Islam; it implies that our religion is incomplete and imperfect with regards to the matters of worship.”

    Shaikh Ibn ‘Uthaimeen says: “Innovation entails the adoption of dangerous ways”

    EDIT to the quote above:
    But of course for Moslems who are ignoring and promoting a Biddah Heresy no matter how Haram (forbidden) it may be, is certainly justified under Shariah, if you can separate gullible Westerners from their money, and use it to kill them.
    The exception is: when BILLIONS of Dollars are involved!
    http://www.pineapplefish56.net/Halal_Meat.html

  2. The hijab could be thought of as a sign worn around a woman’s neck that says, “I am immune from the threat of rape and sexual harassment from Muslim men because I am showing that I submit to Islam and am not a Western slut, like your mother.”. How nice…

    Islamic headgear isn’t about a woman making a fashion choice, it’s part of a carefully thought out piece of agitprop psychological warfare straight out of the terrorist’s secret playbook. We have been brainwashed into thinking that all conspiracies are a sign of craziness but this is a conspiracy, folks, and a very nasty one at that. The end result of the hijab is that the Western women now have a sign around their necks saying, “I don’t care if I am raped because I am an Islam-hating slut who defies Allah”. Then she starts to wear the hijab out of discretion when she goes out. Oh, but I’m crazy if I dare to point it out…

    • “I am immune from the threat of rape and sexual harassment from Muslim men…”

      If she is raped, no one apart from the rapist will see her face, and the need for four witnesses to hide her disgrace will not be required for the Sharia-Embrace.

  3. If someone can wear a surgical mask for health reasons, or a ski mask for comfort in the cold, why trouble with a man or a woman who delusionally perceives that immodesty for anyone but a tearful, blushing bride emanates from the face? If anything, perhaps the ban is sexist, because it seems to single out women.

    • Because females are forced to wear the burka. A submission of willing slaves who call it free choice. If only you loved women enough.

  4. Perhaps the answer is to ban all face coverings in public, in your own home you can wear what you want. It is also a safety risk. Terrorists and bank robbers have been known to wear burqas to carry out their crimes. Antifa shouldn’t be able to cover their faces in a demonstration, they are up to no good anyway, or they wouldn’t wear a face mask, neither should anyone else. It is part of common human interaction to be able to see someone’s face when you are speaking to them. And it is alien to Western culture, it is not our custom. When in Rome…….If someone feels they need wear a burqa there are plenty of countries to live in where it is acceptable. To say so is not an irrational fear of Islam it’s simple common sense. Accept the laws of the country you live in. Religious freedom does not override the safety of the community.
    Face masks for breathing problems are different, they don’t cover the whole face.

    • “Perhaps the answer is to ban all face coverings in public,”

      Can you see the Liberal-Stupidity© in this statement?

      Denmark is targetting a very specific and historical abuse of women. Female are not the target. The right hand of Islam being held back, is.

      These ‘Unfairness,’ ‘Sexist’ and ‘Islamophobia’ propaganda claims, (outraged for Liberty, Equality and Freedom of Conscience), will not stand up in any of their Sharia, Socialist and Communist courts that proclaim “the truth is no defence, the victim took offence.”

      The mentally unstable have now the greater voice over the sane. And if you read, you can hear them.

    • right, ban all public mask wearing. We have CCTV cameras all over the place in public areas. How can we allow individuals to make themselves exceptions to the cameras.

  5. musselma, Sarah L: “I thought we lived in a free society, where people can believe what they want…”

    Islam does not allow people to believe what they want. Women, men and children need protecting from it. Period.

  6. I take issue with this: “the islamic culture insists on moving here and not the other way around.”

    Islam is not a culture. A cult, yes. An Ideology of conquest, yes.

    The hijrah, migration to settle behind enemy lines to make the dar-al harb Islamic, is a most meritorious act in Islam.The Mohammedans will kill and die to make the world Islamic. What are you prepared to do to defend your religion, your culture & civilisation?

  7. I will have to remember your analogy on concealed carry the next time I do more the laugh at someone pushing gun control.

    If the women were wearing it willingly it would be semi acceptable but they are wearing it to remain safe from being raped by the other members of their religion. The idea of women having to wear a specific article of clothing to be safe from rape is evil. The religion that pushes that idea is evil. The people who accept the argument it should be allowed are allowing evil into the nations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*