About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

9 Replies to “Jack [email protected] Rebel: Yorkshire terror wave”

  1. Thanks, Jack. That was a sad but enlightening report. You are so right about the other terror attacks, the rapes, the assaults, the acid attacks, etc. that carry out allah’s command to strike terror in the heart of the Kafir. But these men are not Islamists or a lone wolf. The precise word is jihadi or jihadist for they are involved in hijra (migration to Kafir lands) for jihad.

  2. Completely lucid and studiously articulate.

    Exactly the sort of new voice we need in the digital counterjihad. Without Buckby’s eloquent and original style, things might remain at a supposedly acceptable “legal low” for women and men alike.

    I’ve just finished all that I’m willing to read of her book, “Warrior Marks”. Despite being an almost unanimously lesbian enterprise, Alice Walker’s and Prahitbah Parmar’s 1993 filming narritive of, “Warrior Marks” in West Africa and other global locations represents a valuable, irretractable condemnation of FGM (Female Genital Mutilation).

    For anyone who thinks that I’ve, somehow, hopelessly fallen into the clutches of dominant Progressive Liberal women, please know just how much I appreciate your good wishes…

    That various Christian, Jewish, Hindu, and countless other “faiths” have been unable to make any sort of realistic set-back to world-wide FGM remains a glaring deficit with respect to supposedly-Progressive “Feminism”.

    While I might not be any sort of agendist cheerleader for Alice Walker (as in, far from it), this woman’s dedicated efforts towards eradicating FGM cannot be denied.

    Put rather plainly … If militant Lesbians like Alice Waters are the only ones with sufficient ovaries to march young Third World women away from the excisor’s knife, then it is they (i.e., both groups) who richly deserve to shrug off any and all blame or feelings of guilt.

    • Warrior Marks: Female Genital Mutilation and the Sexual Blinding of Women.

      Thank you Norseradish.

      Does Alice go deeper into the psychology of Islamised males ? That say, spiritual castration of the soul through submission to muhammad, makes them all femaled; and through this path of dhimmitude those born as real women are the masters of the world? And like Communism hates men, women are envied for their wonderful natural and easy dispositions that the muslims want to take her place? Whatever she does and wherever she goes, who she associates with, they want to take over? And therefore muslims use violence and intimidation over women, to insult and rob them, to pretend that they are still men, when they are only thugs and gangsters?

      Or is she just fighting for the right for all females to identity themselves through their clitorises? The godlessness of the femaled, where she takes over and fills the role of the male she envies, and becomes the righful husband and head over the muslims? The hijab is her strength?

      Where she is coming from? Did she reveal it?

      • Does Alice go deeper into the psychology of Islamised males?

        Within this one book (which is all I’ve ever read by Walker), she does not do so to any great extent. Despite Walker’s numerous perfunctory nods to male contributors, there is little in the way of genuine elaboration about menfolk to get in the way of her Sapphic narrative.

        Or is she just fighting for the right for all females to identity themselves through their clitorises?

        While it would be easy to cast aside her clitoro-centric mania in the name of generally opposing the entire LBGTQXYZ… “spectrum” of gender (pubic) hair-splitting, the horrors of FGM are such that anyone, anyone, including a lesbian like Walker, that raises their voice against the “sexual blinding” of women that is happening to innocent young girls around the world on a daily basis merits recognition. Full Stop.

      • “..anyone, anyone, including a lesbian like Walker, that raises their voice against the “sexual blinding” of women that is happening to innocent young girls around the world on a daily basis merits recognition. Full Stop.”
        https://youtu.be/SEbwZfkeIt8

        The part, where female circumcision has without the clitoris removed been the same role as male circumcision: hygiene?

        Anything else is barbarism.

        As I have met and spoken to such circumcised African women who wonder where all this, “It’s the Patriachy,” comes from, I wondered why believing the Feminazis who don’t ever say say, “It’s Islam, dammit,” who instead only attack men while leaving out all the dhimmi-muslims, (who are already dead from the neck up with 72 non-existant virgins in their heads).

        Did you therefore, find a chapter identifying Islam as the main perpetrator of violence against women? Or was it about male-oppression to further her Narrative? That seduction – that she is a friend of women – where the Super-Woman, the Feminist, despises the ‘breeder’ women.

        • Did you therefore, find a chapter identifying Islam as the main perpetrator of violence against women?

          Excellent question. Walker (as author) traipses the ridge line of blame and cultural relativism with the nimbleness of a mountain goat.

          It is difficult to blame the author as this was her first filming in Africa on a devastatingly painful topic.

          If I had the patience for Walker’s highly agendized (in some ways rightfully) politicizations, I would wade through her subsequent body of work for more answers … but I don’t … so I won’t.

        • I was just trying to put together the campaign against male narcissists imprisoning women so they can keep hold of their four wives (intimidation, blacking-up, and clitoris removal); with the narcissist females who degrade straight-men as all rapists and the last to get a job so that the bond of women to the men who were masters of their own homes is broken. Both using Hate Speech laws to keep the ignorance.

          The motive and angle used by the author would have been inciteful to expose. But, there is a nimble book and at least a commendation that ‘the Socialist Workers Party are covering it.’

  3. The motive and angle used by the author would have been inciteful to expose.

    In this particular case it is permissible to generalize and cite rage or anger. Any woman (or man, for that matter), regardless of sexual orientation, should be enraged by the sheer existence of FGM.

    Rest assured that Walker “slips it to the man” by claiming how FGM is a byproduct of patriarchal domination of all females. However, the author remains almost deafeningly silent about how well over 90% of FGM is committed by other women.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*