British government abandons basic principle of treatment of prisoners in democracies

Paul Golding, co-leader of Britain first, has been attacked by muslims in jail and is said to have had his nose broken.

For those who remember the world first for a British man getting the death sentence for littering, Kevin Krehan, this should come as no surprise. But when you see a second ‘Islamophobe’ get put in prison where muslims have easy access to him you cannot write it off as an error. You have to conclude it is policy.

Even child rapists get protective custody in democracies so that the other prisoners will not exact a measure of justice beyond what the judge, speaking for the state, has ordered.

When the UK starts allowing muslim prisoners to take revenge in a state run zoo against people who have a legal right and perhaps even an ethical obligation to criticize immigration and enemy ideologies, you know the state has, to use a very English term, lost the plot.

England, like Sweden and possibly soon, Canada, may need to be sequestered by states who have a sense of self preservation and wish to continue to operate under the aegis of reason.

Quoting from the Mirror:

District Judge Justin Barron said he had no doubt it was the defendants’ intention to use the trial – which involved Muslim immigrants in a “particularly brutal and emotive rape” – for their own political ends.


He added: ‘This was a campaign to draw attention to the race, religion and immigrant background of the defendants.”

It is likely too late to bother pointing out the judge, that the rape was what was “particularly brutal and emotive”, and that Paul’s pointing out the immigration and religion background goes to motive. One that the state deliberately avoids, while simultaneously knowing its true.

In a democracy, the obligation of the opposition is to oppose state policy. However in France, we see with Le Pen, and the Netherlands, as we see with Geert Wilders, the judicial branches have been hijacked specifically in order to criminalize the legal obligation of any sort of shadow cabinet to oppose policies that defy cultural-Marxism.

In many countries, like the UK, there simply is no opposition. There is a Marxist party headed by May, and a Postmodern party headed by Corbyn. In Canada, well its yet to be seen as Canada’s Conservative party has not yet begun to broadcast any policy, although I do have reason for hope.

Paul was jailed for “harassment” of convicted child rapists. Yet if a crowd gathers to torment a convicted non-Marxist offender, who reading this imagines them even being arrested?

Put a stick in England, start rotating it and turn on the vertical toaster. That democracy is done.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

12 Replies to “British government abandons basic principle of treatment of prisoners in democracies”

  1. I hope Canada has found its Trump and will soon be on the way to repairing the damage the radical left has done to your nation.

    • That may be the case actually. Waiting till closer to the election to get into that subject, but I think the Conservatives may have picked someone with both the understanding and the cabability to return Canada to a rational place.

      • I hope so. I’ve been praying for God to send my good neighbors to the north their own version of our President Trump ever since you all got stuck with that freedom destroying, quisling, pansy version of obama you now have in office.

        God Bless America…


        God Bless Canada!!!!

        May Freedom Always Reign in both of our countries!!!!

  2. The only hope left for the UK is that there will be a revolution against these tyrants just as there was when the American Revolution took place. What does it take for the decent British people to finally rise up against their government? How many more Brits have to die or their women and children raped before they say enough is enough?

    • I’m not sure, to tell you the truth.
      For any decent people the fact that their kin have been systematically raped and murdered would be enough.
      It seems that Brits need something more…

      • Look at the level and length of indoctrination that the Brits have been going through, when the US revolution occurred we were revolting to regain our rights and Englishmen. Now the left (and to a lesser extent the right) spent the majority of the 20th and the 18 years of the 21st Century teaching the Brits that they don’t have any rights anymore.

        It takes time to break through that level of indoctrination and bring about a revolution. It took 12 to 15 years of growing oppression by the British Government before the US revolted, this was at a time when the people were freer then now and use to freedom. The Brits have been gradually taught that their rights no longer exist, this makes it harder to get a revolution.

        Having said that look at the massive protest by the soccer fans and the vets. Notice how the police and antifa stayed away for fear of touching off a riot/revolt. Now look at what Tommy Robinson and a few others are doing, they are sowing the seeds of revolt and there are indications that the seeds are sprouting.

        If things explode in Europe this summer (Italy looks to be the spark) we will then discover if the Brits are still Brits or if they have become serfs to their new feudal masters.

  3. Ismailia, Egypt—– In 1928, a Muslim, school teacher, Hassan al-Banna, created The Muslim Brotherhood. He was opposed to the British in Egypt and the Jews in Palestine. Islam does not recognize geographical boundaries, nor does it acknowledge radical and blood differences, considering all Muslims as Umma (global community of Muslims) the Muslim Brethren (Brotherhood) believe that the caliphate is a symbol of Islamic Union and an indication of bonds between Nations of Islam. THEY SEE THE CALIPHATE AND ITS RE-ESTABLISHMENT AS A TOP PRIORITY.

    al-Banna was concerned with what he considered the greatest threat to Islam: the rise of secularism and western culture in Muslim societies. To counter this danger, al-Banna began dawa (proselytization) in SCHOOLS, MOSQUES AND COFFEE HOUSES, spreading his pan-Islamists ideology and emphasizing the need to return to SHARIAH.

  4. In the 1990s, the late Mohammed Mamun al-Hudaibi, the supreme guide from 2002-2004, stated that in a caliphate (Muslim rule) envisioned by the Brotherhood, daily life would be GOVERNED BY ISLAMIC TEACHINGS AS INTERPRETED BY ISLAMIC JUDGES, with no need for a state ruler to impose man-made or general laws. DEMAND SHARIAH — Islam is the solution.

    The Brotherhood has built a grassroots base and used this democratic process despite the groups political goal of UN-DEMOCRATIC, Islamic rule.
    The Dhimmies have served their purpose.

      • The Ikwan basically conspired to revitalize Islam, as it always had been, up to where the various allies destroyed the Caliphate after WW1. So they are a kind of reformist or ‘protestant’ movement if you will.

  5. Islam has been around for 1400 years, I did say Omar al-Banna created the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928, Sayyid Qutb, Mohammad Ma’mun, Osama bin Laden, Khalid Sheik Mohammad, blind Sheik Omar, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Sheik Monzer Taleb, Mohammad Morsi all member of the Brotherhood. CAIR is the Muslim Brotherhood, and many countries have outlawed them. The Muslims from day one have said they cannot accept mixing with jahiliyyah. There will be no law but Shari’ah law. Imams in Canada are calling for a caliphate. Check out Imam Mazim Abdul-Adhim, living in London, Ontario, Canadian head of the terrorists group, Hibz ut-Tharir has been openly speaking about a Caliphate for years. Should he not be charged with sedition and deported?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *