1. Hard to know what to make of this except that this man is lying. If he cannot thank President Trump for getting his son out of a Chinese Prison, then he wouldn’t have thanked him for bringing him home on Air Force One.
Lavar Ball says he did not say thank you to President Trump because he did not fly his son home on Air Force One. pic.twitter.com/oELTuU2SGr
— Ryan Saavedra ?? (@RealSaavedra) November 21, 2017
2. So, polygamy in the UK. This story is gob smacking. Please do click through and read it.
3. Dramatic footage of NORK soldier defecting to South while under fire.
4. We were lied to! Secret document FCO 30/1048 kept truth about EU from British for 30 years
A SECRET document, which remained locked away for 30 years, advised the British Government to COVER-UP the realities of EU membership so that by the time the public realised what was happening it would be too late.
Almost all of the shocking predictions – from the loss of British sovereignty, to monetary union and the over-arching powers of European courts – have come true.
But damningly for Tory Prime Minister Edward Heath, and all those who kept quiet about the findings in the early 70s, the document, known as FCO30/1048, was locked away under Official Secrets Act rules for almost five decades.
The classified paper, dated April 1971, suggested the Government should keep the British public in the dark about what EEC membership means predicting that it would take 30 years for voters to realise what was happening by which time it would be too late to leave.
That last detail was the only thing the disgraceful paper – prepared for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) – got wrong.
(Two points. One, this should be grounds for revolution in the UK against the government without any guilt whatsoever, as this is the government against the people and national sovereignty in the most blunt and deliberate possible way, and two, what sort of equivalent documents does Trudeau have or operating under for Canada?)
5. Interesting exchange of ideas in England
Look how quickly Muslims surround him pic.twitter.com/lnaPgjOuNc
— Tommy Robinson ?? (@TRobinsonNewEra) November 22, 2017
6. Church is ordered to silence its bells at night after 900 years because of ONE noise complaint from neighbour who couldn’t sleep
A 900-year-old church has been ordered to silence its bells at night after one sleep-deprived resident complained the relentless chiming was keeping him awake.
The bells at St Peter’s Church in Sandwich, Kent – first built in 1100 – currently chime every 15 minutes, even during the night.
Sandwich’s 5,000 residents have never previously complained, but noise pollution officers from Dover District Council were drafted in the check if they were a noise nuisance.
They deemed the chimes to be ‘too loud’, and on Monday this week the church was issued with a noise abatement notice.
(If a person moves to a town where this has been going on for a thousand years, I think they maybe shouldn’t get to shut it down against the wishes of the 3300 out of 5000 residents that petitioned to keep them ringing. It should also be noted that under sharia law, no church bells may be heard outside the actual church itself. Minarets can though.)
7. Video of the North Korean defector with explanation of what we saw in yesterday’s raw video of the event.
(Recently I have had to have conversations with people defending communism and even claiming that Mao was a great man and the stories of his atrocities which eclipsed Nazi horrors where simply CIA manufactured propaganda. Still, one has to wonder why it is that your fellow utopian citizens will shoot you in the back for trying to escape the utopia while nations based on truth and freedom have to try and stop the rest of the world from entering.)
Raw security cam footage again:
Thank you Richard, M., Wrath of Khan, Xanthippa, ML., Johnny U., and a long list of wonderful people who have contributed links to this site over the past couple of days.
4 – This makes me wonder just what Obama signed and never gave to the Senate?
“I am reminded of a document I discovered in the National Archives at Kew in January 2002, when sifting through papers released under the 30-year rule relating to Britain’s negotiations to join the Common Market. It was a confidential 1971 memorandum, clearly written by a senior Foreign Office official, headed “Sovereignty and the Community”.
With chilling candour, this paper (from FCO folder 30/1048) predicted that it would take 30 years for the British people to wake up to the real nature of the European project that Edward Heath was about to take them into, by which time it would be too late for them to leave. Its author made clear that the Community was headed for economic, monetary and fiscal union, with a common foreign and defence policy, which would constitute the greatest surrender of Britain’s national sovereignty in history. Since “Community law” would take precedence over our own, ever more power would pass to this new bureaucratic system centred in Brussels – and, as the role of Parliament diminished, this would lead to a “popular feeling of alienation from government”.”
“I was working in the Civil Service at the time and I can vouch for this being the mandarins accepted creed. Cynical? Well at that time the other big government problem was Northern Ireland to which the mandarin’s policy was keep the lid on and by 2000 the Catholics will have out bred the Protestants and the problem will have disappeared. Equally cynical but now of course an unforseen new, fast breeding, alien, population has arisen on the UK mainland which will sweep Sir Humphrey and his mandarins away and install a Caliphate eventually. The Rolls Royce minds of the FCO are not omniscient after all.”
is it wrong to be Angrey about number 4
I honestly and sincerely believe that it is wrong not to be so outraged by #4 Buck, that there should be a full blown revolution on the streets over it and a full overthrow of government.
“I honestly and sincerely believe that it is wrong not to be so outraged by #4 Buck, that there should be a full blown revolution on the streets over it and a full overthrow of government.”
Of which “Brexit” is the merest speck of a reaction. Words like “sedition” and “treason” pale into insignificance by comparison to this massive betrayal.
My heart goes out to those few Britons who actively yearn for their own long-ago-forsaken Second Amendment rights. All the rest (i.e., “sheeple”) can take the proverbial piss.
“Words like “sedition” and “treason” pale into insignificance by comparison to this massive betrayal.”
That use to be an Anglo American right that descended from the Saxon law of “Let All Free Men Be Armed”. This right will return to all free people who survive the coming chaos.
If you’re NOT angry, you’re lost.
I can’t figure out how a country could justify shooting somebody for the crime of trying to get out of the country. Why should the government care if a person wanted to leave other than that they know that they have made life so miserable that half the country would leave if they weren’t physically forced to stay? It’s like you’re dancing with a woman but have her arm bent up behind her back the whole time. It’s an undeniable admission that the country is a prison and therefore a criminal enterprise…
Glad to see that centrally-planned socialist economy is working out so well for them. Better send some money to Bernie Sanders and maybe we can have that here…
“I can’t figure out how a country could justify shooting somebody for the crime of trying to get out of the country.”
Two words: BERLIN WALL
Insert quotes about “those who do not learn from history” >here<.
One word: Refuseniks.
The history of Islam:
2. So, polygamy in the UK. This story is gob smacking. Please do click through and read it.
From the link:
“One woman who did not even realise her marriage was polygamous told the programme — The Truth About Muslim Marriage — that her husband had repeatedly put off following the Nikah ceremony with a civil marriage, which would have given her a number of important legal protections with respect to her children and the division of assets.
She eventually “found out that he had been married to another woman for 13 years before he met her and had another wife as well. When she refused to carry on in a polygamous marriage, she was unable to get a divorce as she had only had a Nikah. She had to sell her house and most of her assets and ended up homeless and had a mental breakdown.””
As someone who always has defended women’s rights and gender equality, this is just one more example of why I cannot summon up a shred of sympathy for Muslimas.
A woman that complies—without any violent objection—in this gendercidal (new word!) farce deserves whatever she gets. It will only be when there is an epidemic of Lorena Bobbitt-style “at home surgeries” in Islamic households that I shall ever reconsider my lack of compassion for Muslimas.
Let’s not even go into how Western Feminists remain deafeningly silent on this entire matter. Their’s is a betrayal—not just of gender and womanhood but of essential and basic human rights—whose scale staggers even the most imaginative mind. It makes all of that previous mid-century whinging about “barefoot and pregnant” and being “chained to the stove” ring supremely hollow. Please pardon me whilst I vomit.
There are few better examples than Muslimas of, “Be very careful about what you wish for…”
I love it!