Spain may want to go back to calling itself, “Al Andaluz”: Links 1 Aug. 7, 2017

Posted on by

1. British police selectively accept hate crimes reports, but only against non-whites.

2. How is this not an invasion? Spain.

3. One author has pointed out a kind of upside of the refusal to allow the building of a Synagogue in Australia. It is proof official that the problem is Islam.

But, as well as revealing the cowardice of the local council and their slithering appeasement of Islamic violence and Islamic Jew hatred, this story has also revealed to the world a lot about Islam itself. The large amount of mainstream media coverage that this story has had has caused many to note that it’s not the Jews whom the cowardly council members are afraid of, but the Muslims. Therefore, this case has inadvertently disclosed to the world that Islam is a problem.

 

Does anyone really truly believe that this decision would have been made in the manner and for the reasons it was if there had been no Muslims in Australia? Of course not. Although anti-Semitism can come from many sources, it is in the modern world, primarily from the ideology of Islam that the sort of murderous Jew hatred that the Bondi councillors are worried about.

4. Canadian immigrant, who gets presumably 6 figures worth of government paid medical care for a pre existing condition, complains to the media about having to shell out a few dollars for a perfectly coloured prosthetic. Literally she has a problem that could have been solved by a pair of socks.

Maybe she should have had the surgery in Kenya. Im sure they had the skills and would have happily paid for all parts of it as well as the perfect shade of prosthetic as well. Don’t Canadians go to Kenya for medical care all the time? I mean apart from FGM of course.

5. Iran monitoring activities of Iranian Christians in U.S., Europe

“If your name comes up anywhere, anywhere that it shouldn’t, then they will keep watching you.”

Even if you think you have escaped to freedom in the West, where authorities remain willfully ignorant about the threat you are under.

“Stunner! Iran’s Basij monitors Christians in West!,” by Bob Unruh, WND, July 24, 2017:

It’s a surprise to no one that Iran’s radical Islamists monitor Christians and others inside their borders.

But now a worldwide Christian ministry, which reaches out to those who are being persecuted, warns of signs that such spying continues even as those members of the faith move to the West.

Officials with Barnabas Fund explain the reports they’ve seen.

“In Iran, Christians are monitored closely and their activities filmed. When the authorities decide to crack down on Christians, they are beaten up, arrested or sometimes they just disappear. One of the main organizations responsible for this is the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The Iranian constitution gives the IRGC a specific responsibility for protecting the Islamic revolution ideology in Iran and exporting it to other countries. Closely associated with the IRGC is the Basij, which has a similar ideological basis but whose members, recruited from school age, hold other full-time jobs.

 

Thank you M., Kel F., Wrath of Khan, ML., Shabnam, and many more who sent in materials. More coming today. 

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

7 Replies to “Spain may want to go back to calling itself, “Al Andaluz”: Links 1 Aug. 7, 2017”

  1. 2 – screw tthe night sticks you need shotguns, sub machine guns, squad automatci weapons and if posssible one of the pod mounted full auto 12 guage shotguns made by KRISS.

    • And FAST! I was so shocked I read through the source articles.
      At least 250-300 overwhelmed border guards.
      They THINK– because the men dispersed in groups around the city, Ceuta.
      The Israeli understatement: “This will end in tears.”

  2. Item 3 – The council decision was upheld by the Land and Environment COURT, a judicial body created by the State Government of New South Wales. The COURT also considered the risk assessment inadequate, i.e. the court declared that based on its knowledge the court considered the danger to be far greater than allowed for in the application. This decision creates a public legal precedent that all future building applications for a mosque must consider. The danger contained within is so great that no nearby building can be protected from it.

    • Only if they apply it that way. As the danger comes from muslims, they may apply it against target buildings of muslims. But if they go by actuarial tables, then mosques also are at high risk of incidents based on the actions of its members, or of a rival mosque.

      We live in an age of selective enforcement based on politically correct poker, and islam however. So I wouldn’t count on this precedent affecting any mosque applications.

    • Imagine there’s Sharia
      It’s easy if you try,
      To have a faith to die for
      Virgins in the sky.

      Imagine all the kufar
      Submitting ’cause or else they die. Oooh ooh

      Maybe it’s because I’m A Believer
      No other God to praise but One
      Maybe you’ll come and join us
      Or your daughters will be gone.

      (You know the rest).