Canada leads the world in selective enforcement for Islam and the left: Links 1, July 15, 2017

1, Trudeau explains how the charter of rights and freedoms must be selectively enforced to advantage muslim killers of infidels at all times in any country, while the victims of said Muslim killers must be avoided, not just ignored.

Danish Youtube analyzes the EU 2016 report on terrorism and de-spins its ludicrous attempts to delink Islam from terror, and exaggerate the danger of “right wing extremism”.

3. Leftist win another war with history, this time in Canada

South Park really did the definitive thing on this issue. Once its OK to ban statues or shows or words, then anyone can get anything banned if they find it offensive and we become authoritarian, puritanical and fascist in no time flat. But that, is what groups like ANTIFA actually want. Study postmodernism. it is about the sacrifice of the individual to the state even to the extent that an innocent person who is killed by the state should consider it a privilege to die for the enhancement and glory of it.

We should understand that the collectivist left and collectivist right in Europe both fully hate the liberal with its notion of individual rights. And tearing down statues is a classic stage in this process.

I find the statues of the antisemite and eugenicist Nellie McClung highly offensive at many levels, But I don’t advocate it be torn down. Tour groups should be made to listen to stories about how she would have had 90% of them forcibly aborted instead.

4. Italy: Messina Mayor cuts power to migrant accommodation

5. Italy: German naval ship brings 923 migrants and refugees to Calabria

6. Tony Blair makes up stats to oppose BREXIT

Thank you M., Johnny U., EB., Wrath of Khan, Buck, Richard, Yucki and all how left great content in the Reader’s links post.

Much more to come. AA really awful story about a woman attacked by a muslim because she had a dog.

 

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

13 Replies to “Canada leads the world in selective enforcement for Islam and the left: Links 1, July 15, 2017”

  1. Of course and understandibly most examples of occupation and colonization are grounds for resentment by the occupied,and in those situations where the occupied gain independence and self-rule result in name changes,etc in an attempt at erasing the telltale and outright signs of minority rule,eg.,name of country changes,cities,towns and street names change to reflect the new order.
    Now wouldn’t it be refreshing if the countries in their new found independence gifted the country with a magnamosity into the future instead of resentment of the past.

  2. There may be a case for deportation here,if the Somali woman is not a citizen,but only a resident.Otherwise,assault charges and education may be in order.Usually,the problem is with young Muslim males not integrating well into our communities.Dogs can be a source of friction in any community,and I doubt Muslims generally would behave like this young female.

  3. 1 – The things that can be said about Trudeau’s actions and statements start with malfeasance of office advance to accessory after the fact to murder and end with treason against humanity. That murderous piece of pig feces was what the Geneva Convention calls an illegal combatant, under international law illegal combatants have no legal rights the captors don’t want to give to them and drum head court-martials and immediate executions are legal.

  4. I find the propaganda in the video on terrorism offensive, Fascism/Nazism is a leftist philosophy not part of the right. Having vented the fact that there was only one action by the resistance that could be called terrorism is somewhat worrying. At this stage in the Invasion and the Civil War there should be more. It the Europeans don’t start fighting back soon their only viable option is going to be refugeeing out if they can find some nation that will take them. The Jews can go to Israel but where will the rest go?

    • “Fascism/Nazism is a leftist philosophy not part of the right.”

      I suppose you could argue this till the cows come home,but for all intents and purposes,Nazism is Right-wing,just as Communism is Leftist.Anyway,that is the consensus of most scholars,and while I did find the debate interesting enough,I will leave it to the scholars to debate.That said,it is nice to see that neither the left nor right wants anything to do with it.Still,the Right needs to learn to live with its dirty linen,Nazism,just as the Left needs to live with Communism.Tough tittie,to both the Left and Right.

      • In Europe in the 19th and 20th century, the great philosophical divide was between leftist collectivism and right collectivism. The differences where Lilliputian.

        Goebbels spent a lot of time early on with the party smoothing things between the international communists and the National communists or NAZI party.

        All these beliefs held that the state was supreme and that the individual was nothing. The hated enemy of both the left and right collectivist, was the liberal.

        Me.

        The collectivists all believe that the state was all important and even when in nocents where killed by the state, they should feel honoured to have sacrificed to it.

        The liberals believe that the rights of the individual is supreme and what government must exist, should have the job of protecting those rights.

        Thomas Jefferson wrote up a document or two showing how that can be done.

        Fascists are just another form of authoritarian leftism, just like international socialism, which were close allies of the Nazis till Hitler decided that National Socialism was the one true path, and Germany’s National socialism.

        Source: Chapter 4 of understanding Postmodernism by Stephen hicks.

        I would suggest people at least read that chapter or listen to it before buying into the leftist propaganda that fascism or nazism is somehow “right wing”.

        • “Fascists are just another form of authoritarian leftism,..”

          Like I said,we could argue this till the cows come home,and I’m not a farmer.Some things we just have to agree to disagree,and move on.

          “I would suggest people at least read that chapter or listen to it before buying into the leftist propaganda that fascism or Nazism is somehow “right wing”.”

          I am familiar with the arguments,and I didn’t dismiss it out of hand,but after due consideration,I accept the majority opinion that Fascism is indeed part and parcel of Right wing ideology.No need to get your Knickers in a knot here.Both Right and Left ideologies have made notable contributions to Modernity,and while both ideologies are imperfect,the two are as necessary to our civilizations as are the two sides of a Gold Eagle coin.

          • If international socialism/communism is the far left and national socialism/communism is the far right where is the non socialist political ideologies? You have no room for them in your political model.

            • If international socialism/communism is the far left and national socialism/communism is the far right where is the non socialist political ideologies? You have no room for them in your political model.

              Brilliant, Richard!

              Calling the Nazis a “hard right” or “right wing” ideology is preposterous (or just plain stupid). Especially after taking a few seconds (too much to ask of some people, I realize) to consider how Germany’s policy of Völkisch equality—brought to its pinnacle by the Nazis—served as the model for America’s own welfare system during its Rooseveltian (FDR) plunge into this nation’s current (poisonous) mixed-economy of Socialist Capitalism.

              After all, does: (from the above link)

              “The Nazis sought to dismantle what they deemed to be an unnatural hierarchy of the middle class and nobility who had allegedly jealously kept their wealth and titles while failing to justify their hierarchical position through their actions in World War I.”

              …sound like anything but the most Liberal and Progressive sort of doctrine?

              Again, brilliant, Richard!

      • The problem is the left and right are on a horizontal plane. But You were meant for a vertical plane. Don’t forget your Plato.

        “We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.” – Plato

        “A sensible man will remember that the eyes may be confused in two ways – by a change from light to darkness or from darkness to light; and he will recognise that the same thing happens to the soul.” – Plato

        Grayscale: from darkness “0” to light “10.”
        Totalitarian regimes are stuck in the mud, zero.

        Prof. Brad Birzner’s lecture on “The Meaning of Liberty During the American Founding,” best explains that vertical plane.

        • “Bradley J. Birzer, Citizenship in a Republic of Letters”
          Haustein Center – July 12, 2014

  5. Bravo for Cornwallis
    Fuck the dummy crackpots who want the statue covered
    So pathetic of these impotent to change history
    And continually apologize for history
    The primitives lost the battles and they were treated well
    By being given land to settle(wow compare what they did with their land to other situations)
    Also attempts were made to try to educate their young

    I’m getting a mini in bronze of Cornwallis for the hood of my car
    In memory of all the Indians he slaughtered on his way to founding
    Halifax….
    three cheers for Cornwallis

  6. Good old Willie new how to say what needed saying.

    ” “The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interred with their bones.”

    Promoting genocide deserves no reward before or after death.
    It deserves only the severest condemnation.