5 Replies to “Free Speech and democracy Trumps political correctness”
She is right the net gives us a way to get around the media filters that are designed to control what you know and how you think. One of the real big things I have learned is to always be upset when people start telling you how you are to think. Thought control of one of the many evils of the left and it is one that is up near the top of the list of evils.
We should be thinking about how we’re going to defend ourselves from internet exposure. Our friends in Europe might be at risk already, and Canada might get sticky.
Google, mind-control, monitoring social media – all of what was revealed in Wikileaks is damning.
We dodged the bullet this time. The crazy left is walking wounded; they may harm us yet.
I want us all to be safe and prepared. Any suggestions?
“She is right the net gives us a way to get around the media filters that are designed to control what you know and how you think.”
Richard, I’m morally obliged to ask if you are now willing to modify your previously averred calculation of another “century” (your own personal estimate) being needed to reverse the (admittedly horrendous demoralization and) damage done by these past several decades of Cultural Marxism.
“One of the real big things I have learned is to always be upset when people start telling you how you are to think. Thought control of one of the many evils of the left and it is one that is up near the top of the list of evils.”
I can only trust how you might be referring to the way that so many of America’s public schools—and supposed “academies of higher learning”—have seemingly abandoned even the slightest pretense of instructing their students with respect to such crucial intellectual instruments as “critical analysis” and the irreplaceable process of “analytical thinking” that might [GASP!] enable them to question all of the shaky propositions which so many modern (morally relativist, transnational, multicultural, globalist, and culturally relativist) university professors deluge their minds with on a daily basis.
Please let me know whether or not you take any degree of offense at my efforts to clarify aspects pertaining to your earlier statements.
As I’ve previously noted, the internet is without historic or modern-day precedent when it comes to propagating information (factual or otherwise) to the greatest number of people, in the shortest amount of time. If those who esteem truth most highly can, somehow, adequately harness this incredible intellectual power-tool, there are few things out of reach for honorable individuals who seek to permanently change this world for the better.
NR, I post this link which I’m quite sure you’ve seen. If this expert is correct, then 100 years is not required to reverse the damage. Indeed, as you point out, there is no precedent to the informational power of the Internet. It could doubtlessly accelerate the process of reversing the cultural marxist damage faster than the couple of generations suggested by this expert. However, I must split hairs when you use the word “harness”. If a beautiful, wild horse is to remain wild, then the best we can do is to fight to keep any harness off of him. He will survive in the wilderness of ideas because he is genetically design to do so.
She is right the net gives us a way to get around the media filters that are designed to control what you know and how you think. One of the real big things I have learned is to always be upset when people start telling you how you are to think. Thought control of one of the many evils of the left and it is one that is up near the top of the list of evils.
We should be thinking about how we’re going to defend ourselves from internet exposure. Our friends in Europe might be at risk already, and Canada might get sticky.
Google, mind-control, monitoring social media – all of what was revealed in Wikileaks is damning.
We dodged the bullet this time. The crazy left is walking wounded; they may harm us yet.
I want us all to be safe and prepared. Any suggestions?
“She is right the net gives us a way to get around the media filters that are designed to control what you know and how you think.”
Richard, I’m morally obliged to ask if you are now willing to modify your previously averred calculation of another “century” (your own personal estimate) being needed to reverse the (admittedly horrendous demoralization and) damage done by these past several decades of Cultural Marxism.
“One of the real big things I have learned is to always be upset when people start telling you how you are to think. Thought control of one of the many evils of the left and it is one that is up near the top of the list of evils.”
I can only trust how you might be referring to the way that so many of America’s public schools—and supposed “academies of higher learning”—have seemingly abandoned even the slightest pretense of instructing their students with respect to such crucial intellectual instruments as “critical analysis” and the irreplaceable process of “analytical thinking” that might [GASP!] enable them to question all of the shaky propositions which so many modern (morally relativist, transnational, multicultural, globalist, and culturally relativist) university professors deluge their minds with on a daily basis.
Please let me know whether or not you take any degree of offense at my efforts to clarify aspects pertaining to your earlier statements.
As I’ve previously noted, the internet is without historic or modern-day precedent when it comes to propagating information (factual or otherwise) to the greatest number of people, in the shortest amount of time. If those who esteem truth most highly can, somehow, adequately harness this incredible intellectual power-tool, there are few things out of reach for honorable individuals who seek to permanently change this world for the better.
NR, I post this link which I’m quite sure you’ve seen. If this expert is correct, then 100 years is not required to reverse the damage. Indeed, as you point out, there is no precedent to the informational power of the Internet. It could doubtlessly accelerate the process of reversing the cultural marxist damage faster than the couple of generations suggested by this expert. However, I must split hairs when you use the word “harness”. If a beautiful, wild horse is to remain wild, then the best we can do is to fight to keep any harness off of him. He will survive in the wilderness of ideas because he is genetically design to do so.
https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DbX3EZCVj2XA&ved=0ahUKEwi33YudvarQAhVGPCYKHVhHCKcQtwIITDAJ&usg=AFQjCNEPkrOgbNE08PJLgrt9cEFIYhwlAg
Lol. Then I go to check your link and voila!