Austria: Journalist says it’s time to discuss whether Islam should be banned in Europe

A comment of Wolfgang Fellner in the daily newspaper “Österreich” has provoked outrage among local Muslims. In the Wednesday edition the published stated: “Now we must permit discussion about whether or not Islam as such should be banned in Europe.” According to the Islamic faith community, Fellner is thus attaching “the central human right of religious freedom”.


The journalist has since clarified this, saying he doesn’t support this position himself, just thinks we should be allowed to discuss it. Of course the implicit admission – that there are things we’re not allowed to discuss currently – is in itself inherently sinister.

4 Replies to “Austria: Journalist says it’s time to discuss whether Islam should be banned in Europe”

  1. The first thing to note is that the religion is xenophobic, it’s core texts call for the death of non-Muslims and is especially focussed on a hatred of Jews.

    Key aspects are that non-believers are deemed to be haram or unclean along with pigs dogs, urine and faeces. That is about as de-humanising as it can be. When I hear a Muslim talk about Humanity I often think that they are only referring to Muslims. This fits in with their definition of innocent which is only a devout Muslim.

    Another key phrase linked to the Islamic concept of slander is “spreading mischief” on the land, which you will find in verse after verse, this is in affect any unbeliever by their existence.

    “5:32 On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person – unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land – it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.”

    Note the key use of spreading mischief in this verse, what this means is that it does not apply to non-Muslims in terms of their very existence.

    Its this type of details that needs to be exposed for what it is and this verse 5:32 is especially important as many Islamic’s use this verse omitting the part where it says “unless… for spreading mischief in the land.”

    Any imam using this verse after an atrocity should be deemed to be a supporter of Jihadist’s.

    We need people like Donald Trump to understand this, then we need to expose this at a global level so that the duplicity of Islam is understood by all non-Muslims, then from that its simply a matter of treating people who follow this xenophobic religion as not being worthy of any respect, especially in our societies. This is hearts and minds and this is the way to defeat Islam at a global scale.

    This is why they are so desperate to curtail freedom of expression and this is why our current leaders are just as much the enemy as the Jihadists, because the way to defeat Islam is staring them in the face and yet they are passing laws that block people pointing out what I just did.

    Islam is a crime against humanity, pure and simply that, as Ross A Lloyd so correctly pointed out.

  2. This discussion will be held many times in the coming years, the answer is going to vary depending on the politics of the group debating the question yet the end result is going to be that if we don’t want to commit cultural and national suicide we must decide if we can tolerate any religion that doesn’t tolerate other religions?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *