I would like to suffix this video with some additional reasoning to support the position of these gentlemen.
The natural bond that exists between a mother and child in islam is already broken and overpowered by the need to support, and be seen to support islam as the dominant set of memes in one’s life overall. We see this both in honour killings and in mothers proud to send their children out as walking bombs to kill the unbelievers and achieve virgins in paradise.
The motive of the misnamed ‘honour killings’ becomes clear when you read Reliance of the Traveler, the section on killing without retribution where it explains that should a child or grandchild dishonor the religion, not the family or tribe except by extension when they dishonor the religion, that the parents may kill the without retribution from the umma or islamic community.
So it should not be difficult to comprehend how muslims could turn on their non-muslim casual acquaintance or other non-blood relation in this fashion if they can actually murder their own children with pride.
The second point of additional reasoning is investment. Typically the human being, and likely domestic animals to a degree, tend to favour a thing they put a lot of work into. For example, beyond the natural bond of a mother to her children, there is the incredible amount of work and self-sacrifice which is often the case with raising children. This goes a decent distance to explain what a parent will do to protect a child as they are also protecting their own investment. Muslims who are religious, especially the men, may go to mosque 5X a day and adjust every facet of their lives to fit in with the sharia on even the most basic matters. When a person has that kind of investment in a system of thought, they likely would have no hesitation to turn on a non-muslim with whom they have a casual or business or even closer relationship.
H/T Oz-Rita
Excellent interviews. Please add Jamie to Vlad Tepes.