(Quite interesting so far as I have seen it)
(And this will be the next in a series of things we will forget just like about half a dozen of similar incidents in the US in the past couple of years)
Two men dressed as women tried to ram the gate of the National Security Agency headquarters in Fort Meade with an SUV Monday morning, resulting in a shooting that left one person dead, according to an official and sources familiar with the investigation.
After the gate was rammed, a guard reportedly got into an argument with the men and gunfire erupted. It is believed that the guard shot one or both of the men, who were taken to local hospitals to be treated, sources told Fox News.
A senior U.S. official told The Associated Press that preliminary reports indicate one person of the two people in the car is dead. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the official has not been authorized to discuss the incident by name.
(It wasn’t that long ago that useful idiots on the left propagated this meme. Now it appears they have gone a giant leap farther)
Administrators at a Catholic university in Florida agreed to help an honors student start a campus club that would send money and supplies to the ISIS terror army.
Hidden camera footage released Monday morning shows officials and faculty at Barry University advising a senior – identified only as ‘Laura’ – about the best way to secure funding for a club she called ‘Sympathetic Students in Support of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.’
‘I want to start fundraising efforts on campus, and what I want to do is raise funds to send overseas,’ she told Derek Bley, the school’s Coordinator for Leadership Development and Student Organizations.
Bley offered to help her create the organization and agreed with her request to ‘pass out Islamic State flags and educate people’ at an annual student ‘Festival of Nations’ fair.
The video is from Project Veritas, a conservative ‘guerilla film-making group’ that last week captured a Cornell University dean agreeing that ISIS and Hamas would be welcome at the Ivy League school.
Gruesome new images have emerged showing Islamic State militants stoning a blindfolded and bound man and woman to death in Iraq after they were accused of having sex before marriage.
Taken in the ISIS-stronghold of Mosul in Nineveh province, the shocking images show a large crowd gathered to watch the jihadis murder the defenceless couple.
Young boys clamber onto their fathers’ shoulders to get a better view of the man and woman being charged with ‘fornication’, before the familiar white-bearded face of ISIS’s elderly Mosul-based executioner-in-chief Abu Ansar al-Ansari orders their stoning to death.
(Lots of images at site)
(If he can stall the trial a year or two he can use the ‘it was a temporary marriage and halal’ defense)
The girl was taken from Nairne Street at around 4pm on Thursday.
It is believed she was dropped off 30 minutes later three miles away in Whitefield Street, Hapton, where she was found and later returned home.
Imran Khan, 33, of Accrington, is accused of taking a child under the Child Abduction Act, Lancashire Police said.
He has also been charged with breaching a Sexual Offences Prevention Order and inciting a girl under 13 to engage in sexual activity
(And this is why you don’t allow muslim clowns or magicians for your kid’s birthday parties)
Thank you Tundra T and Buck for all your help this morning. I will be working a lot on getting Geert Wilders’ speech in Austria ready for us all today which means not as much time for posting news. But I would like to offer a thought on some of what is posted.
This is not the first writings here about the ethics of showing islamic atrocities. Regular readers will notice that this site has switched from Youtube to LiveLeak for many videos as they seem a little less concerned about horror in video. Horror that to a degree at least, I feel should be seen. This boils down to a conflict between two views on the matter. The view that censors these images as a lot of arguments. That it is re-victimizing the victims. I suppose to a degree it is. That its pornographic in a certain manner and shouldn’t be seen by the public. To a degree this is also true but one never knows how another individual will view anything. But in large numbers we can. That this material is designed by muslims to intimidate the unbeliever and make him more compliant due to fear of islamic mastery over them. I’ll come back to this one. The argument that carries political weight however and forces video streaming services to not carry this material is that it may inspire others or ‘radicalize’ people to join the islamic cause. There is no doubt whatsoever that this is true.
All I can offer to counter these good points are the following:
point 1: It is better to show the suffering of victims to those still unaware of the new world order so that many may make decisions to avoid circumstances where they themselves could become the victims. We already see now the lack of sympathy to those women who go to islamic lands and get in trouble. This is because at this stage we expect Western women to know the risks associated with travel there. Having said that I genuinely do blame the mass media for massaging the truth about islam to the point where most really do not understand how sharia works. Maybe 1% of the Western world’s people read sites that would give them a true picture. For the rest, some sympathy is probably deserved.
Point 2: A warning should suffice to let people know what they are about to see should they click play.
Point 3: This material is meant to intimidate and force compliance. But that only works where muslims can take political power. Ultimately this boils down to a race. By showing what islam does, I would wager that 10,000 Western people would, once content with the veracity of the material and the motives for the behaviors, find islam and islamic law abhorrent. They would shun it and fight it. They would apply pressure to governments to stop its incursions. That would be, 10,000:1 for each person who was inspired to join the islamic cause whether it be for religious reasons or the odd psychopath or rapist pedophile that sees islam as an opportunity. These are odds I am happy to roll the dice on. Because by censoring this material such as the Daily Mail does show in item #4 it does make gains for liberal democracy. And even those who come forth inspired to join the barbarians in our midst, offers clarity and resolution which work for us as opposed to the Obama-Cameron narrative of Islamic ambiguity. A strategy which most certainly works for the enemy as they use it themselves.
We need to win this race and that means we show this material to good people now or else they will show it to good people later for a radically different purpose.