1. Another CBC expert on terrorism weighs in on the Ottawa shahid video
Witnesses say the attackers shouted “God is Great” in Arabic (“Allahu Akbar”).
2. Dr. Jasser gives reaction to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech
3. Ezra Levant with Marc Lebuis: Radical Islam in Canada, From Wife Beating to ISIS
6. Admiral (Ret) Ace Lyons video with Andrew Bostom on a United West video.
(I have not watched it yet but Admiral Lyons is always exceptionally lucid. Don C. offers this: “More focused with less joking around than the usual United West format. Admiral Lyons gives a history of missed opportunities since the Iranian Revolution (from around 18:00). Andrew Bostom co-hosts and among much else explains the relevance of najis, things or persons considered ritually unclean in Islamic law.))
7. Some shocking comments by members of an “Islamic Tribunal” in Texas – the first in the U.S. – about the value of Sharia Law, made on the Glenn Beck Program.
(CNSNews.com) – In a speech delivered last month to commanders and other personnel in the Iranian Air Force, whom he described as “officials who have very sensitive occupations,” Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei—Iran’s Supreme Leader and commander in chief—boasted that Iran had enriched uranium to the 20-percent level.
At the same time, the Supreme Leader noted that his government had agreed to shut down its production of 20-percent enriched uranium “for a while” in its effort to reach a deal with United States and other foreign powers that would include lifting the sanctions now imposed on his country.
Thank you M., Wrath of Khan, Richard, Don C., LCC., and many more.
Notice the odd scrambling by CNN and other major networks in North America to put out-of-context reports on what Islam is and is not in order to maintain and preserve the victim narrative. Most conspicuous is the idea that for women, islam is just a matter of pieces of cloth on the head and to know what it is to be muslim is to put a piece of cloth on your head and feel that any opposition towards you is due to people’s irrational hatred of that cloth and so they must be awful, racist people to do that. In fact, the outward symbols of serious adherence to islam today is fully and reasonably comparable to wearing a Nazi outfit or a Mao jacket for those who remember how truly evil that man was. The symbols have more meaning than just bits of coloured cloth and to trivialize it that way is to transform a news agency from what its name implies to a rather evil form of self destructive propaganda. Not to mention destructive to all of us.
This scrambling seems to be the result of more and more stories of mosques and islamic institutions being outed as beachheads and forward stations of a takeover of Western civilization. The disparity grows shrill and the cognitive dissonance from it lessened as it gets more difficult to ignore reality in favour of the narrative. Not that many won’t cling to it. For those that can’t be bothered to take the dive into what is actually and truly in the interests of liberalism, the spell of moral superiority is hard to break and you can hear it with those who cling to the ‘religion of peace’ nonsense as well as the notion that opposition to islam is racism. Yet none of those people will ever debate the facts. Just pre-digested rhetorical devices provided by the Frankfurt School.
The time required to explain it to them grows short however.