1. Homeland Security’s Mohammed Elibiary: Caliphate Inevitable
A firestorm has erupted online after senior Department of Homeland Security advisor Mohamed Elibiary tweeted that a “Caliphate” is inevitable and compared it to the European Union.
He also recently criticized “drive-by” attacks on Islamism. Elibiary has a history of pro-Muslim Brotherhood advocacy and has close ties to a Hamas financier.
(Gee whizz its almost like Obama is, well is on the other side!)
2. Muslim man murders pregnant prostitute because she was working near a mosque
(You can tell this man was highly influenced by the run-away best selling book, ‘What would Mohamed do?’ a primer in Islamic ethics and murder techniques)
3. Sudanese woman released again and for the moment is somewhat safe at the US embassy.
4. Now this is interesting. Ontario farmer charged with illegal slaughter of sheep for muslims but the muslims who did the actual slaughtering are not facing any charges.
An Ottawa farmer claimed discrimination in court Monday after he was charged with operating an illegal slaughter plant without a licence while the Muslim men who bought and killed his sheep were not.
Anthony Scissons sold live sheep to the men in October 2012 from his farm in the rural community of Dunrobin, west of Kanata.
(Canada joins the 2 tier law club with England it appears.)
More on this here: Muslim men describe ritual slaughter where they throw the farmer under the bus claiming ignorance and not standing up for him whatsoever.
5. David Cameron gave his annual Ramadan message. Here it is with a couple of minor corrections for accuracy.
Thanks M, Wrath of Khan and many others. Hell of a day ay? And Ramadan doesn’t even start till tomorrow. I hope everyone has their festive Kevlar jackets back from the dry cleaner for the holiday and Vladtepesblog will be posting helpful tips on how to remove blood from various protective materials over the month for us kafirs who get in the way of the religious muslims being all peaceful etc.
I would have preferred ” dhimmi ” cam-moron to have said ” islam in a man is as dangerous as rabies in a dog ” one of englands greatest men Winston Churchill ,,had the balls to say it [ ed uk]
1/ It has ever been thus.
Talking with the jihadists is a strategy for losing
Within the Muslim world, “sizable groups and schools of thought” view the West as weakening, in decline, unwilling and maybe unable to defend itself. They further believe that Muslims have a religious obligation to exploit this opportunity to expand “the writ and word of Allah.” “Modern jihad erupted in full force with the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979 in both the Shiite and the Sunni world.” Thousands of jihadist attacks have followed over the years since.?
Jihadists of the Sunni variety are now fighting on more battlefields than ever, and the Shia rulers of the Islamic republic of Iran, with their eyes on future jihad, have spent an estimated $100 billion to develop a nuclear weapons capability. If they achieve it, our grandchildren will live in a very different world. It’s amazing how many people still don’t grasp that.
http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/24/may-talking-with-the-jihadists-is-a-strategy-for-l/?page=all#pagebreak.
At this point in history David Cameron should be giving a Ramadan speech that starts with, “Hey, Muslims. I’ve got something to say to you.” Why is he still kissing their asses as the world burns with a thousand Islamic fires? Why do they keep acting as if there isn’t a problem? Who’s ordering them to do that?
#1
I’ve seen with my own eyes that the Russians used to bring young people from all over the world to Moscow, put them through university, expose them to an unbelievably large assortment of anti-American “documentaries” about how lousy life is in the USA, and generally be quite nice to them as they welcomed them into the friendly Soviet family.
Why is it so impossible to imagine that the KGB had a program of looking for charismatic, intelligent individuals who might one day get into politics and, well, rise as high as they can go. Or maybe it’s the Saudis or Pakistanis or the bloody United Arab Emirates. There are dozens of different national spy agencies that could be behind it.
Everything that Obama does is always the exact perfect thing from the point of view of the worst of our enemies. Mohamed Elibiary advising Homeland Security? Half a billion going now toward defeating al-Assad and fighting on the same side as ISIS, no less? Letting the Iranians get the bomb? Siding with the Muslim Brotherhood over the people of Egypt. They got one inside, folks. Just like they nailed the Twin Towers and the Pentagon…
Chris,
They’re doing just that all over Latin America. Shittes are wildly ambitious proselytizers.
Iran Aggressively Recruiting ‘Invisible Army’ of Latin American Converts to Infiltrate U.S. Through ‘Soft Belly’ of the Southern Border
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/09/03/iran-aggressively-recruiting-invisible-army-of-latin-american-converts-to-infiltrate-u-s-through-southern-border/
Here’s another article describing the experience of one who got away:
With lure of religious classes, Iran seeks to recruit Latin Americans
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/with-lure-of-religion-classes-iran-seeks-to-recruit-latin-americans/2013/08/10/8e3592c6-f626-11e2-9434-60440856fadf_story.html
From what is going on in DC and other capitals they are putting as many people as they can in western political parties to influence those parties and hamper our defense of the west.
Recipe for failure.
(And Failure starts with “F” as in Four as in “4 Horsemen.”)
VICE News – video – Christian City Under Siege: The Battle for Iraq (Dispatch 5)
5/ The speech as written could have been delivered as satire, deriding and exposing Muslim vice and folly, but British TV seems to have run short on canned laughter these days. The improved version brings some badly needed contact with reality.
Things have reached a pass when Stephen Fry looks about as plausible in that role as any actual British PM holding the office in recent memory.
2/ Where is Shariah justice when you need it? So long as England is running parallel legal systems, Farooq here could have his head chopped in Trafalgar Square. He wouldn’t mind. Make it a weekly thing – Farooq, Hassan, Ali, Mohammed…
Re: The caliphate
I have no problem with a caliphate. In fact it is vital there is one, and what we have been doing for the lasr decade has brought that about. Whether it is by our design or not, it is irrelevant.
The caliphate will not be treated as a EU, but a beligerant USSR. The difference being that the caliphate will not have the power of the USSR.
All measures that were applied to the USSR, will be applied to the caliphate- very restricted immigration – in fact none but diplomats will be allowed. No economic dealings with the caliphate except that are necessary for us. No aid.Nada.
Unlike in the days of the Cold war, the caliphate will not have India and China as friends. Quite the opposite. The caliphate will be attacked, invaded and some territories captured as part of the war, and there is nothing they will be able to do about it. Our resident Muslim population will be treated as sleepers were in the cold war. They will be in a dire position.
This is a really good idea.
Can you work it up and publish it or post it where it’s likely to be seen by a broad and more diverse public?
Re : Caliphate
A couple of years ago I wrote here at Vladtepes
How is it, that since 9/11, not one leader in the Western world has stepped out of line of the mantra that Islam is the RoP. Not one. No exception. After every terrorist outrage – 9/11, 7/7, Madrid, Beslan, Boston, etc etc , every Western leader comes out and mumbles the same old – Islam is a RoP, tiny minority of extremists etc etc – you know the spiel. Not one, no exception.
This in itself must a beg a question or two. There is hardly any doubt that this unity of response, carried over a decade, and over different governments, is an agreed Western policy. If it were not so, then at least one leader would have demurred from the spiel.
As the combined military forces of Islam are no match for even a medium sized Western nation, while Jihadi terrorism are mere flea bites, one has to ask the question – what are our leaders up to.
I have no doubt now that that war is a coordinated strategic policy, in which all Western nations are taking part. The clue is that even the most vehemently neutral nations, Sweden, and once even Switzerland, were part of the allied forces in Afghanistan. Sweden, Switzerland???
Even when there is a change in government, the incoming government is informed by senior civil servants that it has no real choice in this matter, no matter what they said while electioneering. Note the way that with socialist Hollande, France has continued the policy with even greater vehemence then the previous conservative Sarkozi – Syria, Libya. Ditto democrat Obama – drones, Syria, Libya. Ditto conservative Cameron after Labour Blair.
An important part of the strategy requires that Western governments maintain the fiction that the West is not at war with Islam.
Our leaders are not stupid, and even if they were, the senior civil servants ( See Yes Minister), are not. There is something afoot. As Bush and Blair have maintained, they will be vindicated in 50 years or so.
DP-
You can use most of the latter post as introduction to your first entry, why the West should support a “Caliphate”. It’s more contemporary that way.
This is very good, worth more extensive circulation.