News links for Feb. 21 2014 – 3

1. Muslim solicitor’s career in ruins after she lied to cover up her father’s speeding points then tried to have trial in secret for ‘cultural reasons’ until Daily Mail won legal challenge

(Just another example of a muslim trying to be able to beat the system and suffer no consequences for a failure for reasons that could never apply to an indigenous British person. Disgusting.)

2. Butcher’s assistant who stabbed popular boss 51 times in unprovoked attack before going on machete rampage is jailed for 27 years

3. January 2014: Interesting article about the man who was planning to destroy a Via rail train, his motives, beliefs and continued attempts to live under sharia law in Canada. Read it now while we are still allowed. Also here, an article about the interview by Clare Lopez.

4. A brilliant example of Islamic logic. Islam, a former PM says, is under siege in Malaysia, because if Islam loses its iron grip on all policy, then things may appear which offend muslims and Christians may get to use the word, ‘Allah’ to refer to their god. (The one thing I do agree should be a crime. Allah is no more god than peter pan is Donald duck. Real or imagined, they do not have the same attributes. For one thing, Donald can’t fly)

5. Switzerland: Racism watchdog calls immigration vote a ‘setback’

(My suggestion for this watchdog, would be to work on China, Japan, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Zimbabwe and about 30 other nations which have always had extremely racist and restrictive laws about immigration or do now, and when they meet the approximate diversity and equality for outsiders that Switzerland now enjoys, they can come back and wave their finger at the Swiss)

6. The Truth about the UN:

Dedicated to Mark Steyn:

Thank you UK Pete, Fjordman, Yucki, Ox AO and all. Thanks again.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

9 Replies to “News links for Feb. 21 2014 – 3”

  1. 3/ Sure would save time and money not having Muslims in Canada in the first place.

    Since we’re going to have them, we can look forward to seeing lonely idiot Canadian girls and lonesome idiot Canadian boys arrested along with their jihadist ‘Canadian’ boyfriends in the future, tearfully defending the terrorists’ actions in interviews with the press. Anguished families, lives in ruin and youthful suicides, bonus items in the wreckage our time and money have bought.

  2. 5/ That she isn’t off lecturing the Chinese, the Saudis and the rest of the world underscores her own racism of lowered expectations.

    The Switzerland she is pressing for will be more anti-Jewish. In pressing for it, she is no doubt stoking anti-Jewish feeling. Her position serves no one except foreigners wrecking Switzerland, and a wrecked Switzerland won’t serve them.

    ‘Awareness-raising campaigns for young children are important.’

    How sinister is that.

  3. On Switzerland’s vote to curb immigration

    Quote from the article: S.S.-D.: Integration programmes are a positive thing as long as they don’t aim at assimilation. Integration is for people arriving here and contributes to better social cohesion.

    This is an absurd statement. The Swiss are well integrated in the first place,. Allowing immigrants with a totally different, or even hostile culture, can never improve social cohesion. It is like adding water to whiskey, and then claiming that the drink is more proof.

  4. @5 Common anti-sense vs common sense!

    ‘Foreign pig’ does not violate racism law (swissinfo, Feb 21, 2014)
    http://bit.ly/1fpKm9l
    “Calling someone a “foreign pig” and “filthy asylum seeker” is an insult but does not violate Swiss anti-racist legislation, the country’s highest court has ruled in a judgment published on Friday. The Federal Court had been considering an appeal by a policeman against a suspended fine imposed by a court in Basel for using the words to an Algerian whom he had detained on suspicion of bag-snatching.The incident occurred at the Basel Watch Fair in April 2007. The suspect had been handcuffed, and when the policeman was going through his papers and discovered that he was an asylum seeker he used the words in the presence of numerous bystanders. The court found that the terms did not violate the anti-racist law because they were not directed at a specific ethnic group or religion. It also said that using the word “pig” (Sau-) or “filthy” (Dreck-) followed by mention of a person’s nationality was not a violation of the law either. The two prefixes have long been used in the German-speaking world as terms of abuse, the court said. Although they are insulting, they cannot be regarded as an “attack on human dignity”, as defined by the law…”

  5. #4

    I can’t for the life of me understand why any Christian would think that Allah and God were the same Guy. Why are so many people so dumb? Allah says that Jesus is a Muslim, and that He is not His son, and that on Judgement day He will be be right there with a pitchfork if you don’t convert to Islam before you die. Does that sound like the God of the Christians and the Jews? Would the God of the Jews say that Jews were the descendants of apes and pigs? Is there a spot in the Bible where God boasts about being the biggest, best liar in the universe? Allah and God are not the same guy! The people who claim that they are, are called, “liars”.

    I suspect that the poor Malaysian Christians are suffering from Stockholm syndrome. Allah is definitely not their friend, and at some level they’ve got to know that. It must be unthinkable to live in a Muslim-majority country…

  6. Dedicated to Mark Steyn/ Dr.Charles Krauthammer, on my Read-every-Friday List, writes,

    “The myth of ‘settled science”
    I repeat: I’m not a global warming believer. I’m not a global warming denier. I’ve long believed that it cannot be good for humanity to be spewing tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. I also believe that those scientists who pretend to know exactly what this will cause in 20, 30 or 50 years are white-coated propagandists.

    “The debate is settled,” asserted propagandist in chief Barack Obama in his latest State of the Union address. “Climate change is a fact.” Really? There is nothing more anti-scientific than the very idea that science is settled, static, impervious to challenge. Take a non-climate example. It was long assumed that mammograms help reduce breast cancer deaths. This fact was so settled that Obamacare requires every insurance plan to offer mammograms (for free, no less) or be subject to termination.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-krauthammer-the-myth-of-settled-science/2014/02/20/c1f8d994-9a75-11e3-b931-0204122c514b_story.html

  7. If you don’t have time for the full article linked above, just read this last bit:

    Climate-change proponents have made their cause a matter of fealty and faith. For folks who pretend to be brave carriers of the scientific ethic, there’s more than a tinge of religion in their jeremiads. If you whore after other gods, the Bible tells us, “the Lord’s wrath be kindled against you, and he shut up the heaven, that there be no rain, and that the land yield not her fruit” (Deuteronomy 11).

    Sounds like California. Except that today there’s a new god, the Earth Mother. And a new set of sins — burning coal and driving a fully equipped F-150.

    But whoring is whoring, and the gods must be appeased. So if California burns, you send your high priest (in carbon -belching Air Force One, but never mind) to the bone-dry land to offer up, on behalf of the repentant congregation, a $1 billion burnt offering called a “climate resilience fund.”

    Ah, settled science in action.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*