Shaun Tuck: Police probe footballer who encouraged riots and bomb attacks on mosques

It would be nice if just once the police actually arrested and charged the Muslims who both in mosques and out in the open preach hatred of the infidel, genocide of Christians and Jews, sedition of the British government and democracy itself, and the countless other way-over-the-line crimes muslims do as a matter of central dogma as a believer in islam.

And frankly people should not be destroying every mosque in England.

The Government should.

The Mirror:

The non-league striker called for Muslim children to be beheaded in apparent revenge for the street killing of Drummer Lee Rigby

Police probe: Shaun Tuck in action for former club Marine
Police probe: Shaun Tuck in action for former club Marine
Gareth Jones

A footballer who encouraged people to riot and “bomb and gas every mosque in England” following the terrorist beheading of Drummer Lee Rigby could be prosecuted.

Shaun Tuck is being investigated by police following his vile rant on Twitter which saw him calling for Muslim children to be beheaded in apparent revenge for the street killing of the 25-year-old soldier.

Click to continue:

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

10 Replies to “Shaun Tuck: Police probe footballer who encouraged riots and bomb attacks on mosques”

  1. The title of this article is wrong. He didn’t just encourage others he said he was going to do it.

    This is the comment that could land him into jail,
    ““I’d be going through there door mate an taking there kids head off an killing whoever was in site!!””

  2. Yes, Shaun Tuck should give some serious thought to the sobriety of his Tweets, but as long as Muslims like Anjem Choudary remain free to work tirelessly and openly for the annihilation of the British Peoples, it hardly seems fair to go after Shaun, considering he has every reason in the world to be really angry. Honestly, it’s as if the governments of the Western World are staying up nights trying to figure out bigger and better ways to screw things up. I really don’t get it. If Winston Churchill were alive today, I do believe he would have David Cameron arrested.

  3. Well in the US that is still not a crime unless it has immediacy. In other words, angry people say “OOOOooooo I’m gonna kill him-her-them all the time as a matter of course and unless you say, ‘tomorrow afternoon at 3:00 over at the tennis club’ it isnt a crime. In fact thats arguably how muslims get away with the constant vague threats to kill and genocide everywhere. They are vague about when and how.

  4. Given enough provocation the Brits and others around the world will react, the reaction will take longer to come then we would like, and will probably be more violent then most would like, but it is coming.

  5. “…And frankly people should not be destroying every mosque in England.
    The Government should.

    LOVE IT ! 🙂

    @OxAo

    “This is the comment that could land him into jail,

    ““I’d be going through there door mate an taking there kids head off an killing whoever was in site!!””

    It actually should not because – as unimpressive as his grammar seems to be, he did put this sentence in the “conditional” ie “I’d” ..meaning: “I WOULD”..

    //end of grammar nazi mode 😉

  6. “And frankly people should not be destroying every mosque in England.

    The Government should.” Well said

  7. Actually, “I’d be going” could also be interpretted as “I should be going” i.e. “I feel it needs to be done, but actually, I am just too civilised”.
    Difference? When a jihadi says it, he might actually do it. This guy? Not so much. Just ranting.
    Take away their speech and you risk leaving them only violence. Much better to let the people rant.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*