Accused rioter Mohammed Issai Issaka berated in court after refusing to stand for Magistrate Jacqueline Milledge

Once again a moronic lefty judge submits to the preposterous notion that the irrational and superstitious beliefs of immigrants should trump the law of Australia as determined through centuries of rational and democratic jurisprudence. The fact that she challenged him on his stance looks like a victory but it is actually a loss. It is nearly an enemy gambit actually. Because it leads the way to muslims being able to show contempt for our laws legally if they can cite scripture to show where it is required of them.

Her argument is a defacto admission that islam and sharia trumps secular law. Just as in the payout in the previous post on Sweden.

Eeyore

H/T M

Daily Telegraph Au.

Accused rioter Mohammed Issai Issaka berated in court after refusing to stand for Magistrate Jacqueline Milledge

A MAN accused of rioting during last year’s violent Muslim protests has been berated for his “disrespect” after refusing to stand before a magistrate at his court hearing.

Mohammed Issai Issaka, who was charged with riot, assaulting police and resisting arrest over the September incident, this morning said his religious beliefs stopped him for rising for the court – the standard practice whenever a judge or magistrate enters or leaves.

Magistrate Jacqueline Milledge repeatedly demanded Issaka stand for her, telling him she didn’t accept his refusal.

Click to continue:

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

9 Replies to “Accused rioter Mohammed Issai Issaka berated in court after refusing to stand for Magistrate Jacqueline Milledge”

  1. Its called contempt of court….and upon a judge’s order this piece of human refuse could rot in jail until he decided to stand……….the judge was just spineless……………….

    Regards, Don Laird
    Dogtown, Crankville County
    Alberta, Canada

    “Somewhere between here and there………………….”

  2. Have you noticed that if you ­rearrange the letters in ‘illegal ­immigrants’, and add just a few more letters, it spells, ‘Go home you free-loading, benefit-grabbing, resource-sucking, baby-making, non-English-speaking ********* and take those other hairy-faced, sandal-wearing, bomb-making, camel-riding, goat-********, raghead ******** with you..

  3. @Tony……..now that was priceless!!!…………bravo sir!!!…..well, bloody done!!!!

    Regards, Don Laird
    Dogtown, Crankville County
    Alberta, Canada

    “Somewhere between here and there………………..”

  4. Now, if the judge entered the courtroom dressed decently, (as she would in a Sharia Court), in a burka, then factually he would not see her and would not have to stand. No one would need to save face, the Communist nor the Fascist and they could have had a quickie-marriage in the Gender-Neutral toilets behind the building and their love-child off to a nursery quicker than you could say“skip to me loo me darlin'”

  5. Tony, that was awesome! Moronic lefty judge is putting it mildly. This is institutionalised stupidity to the max! Rule of law is now subservient to sharia. Anglo-Saxon Common Law is now that much closer to being replaced by primative, evil sharia law, and all because of dhimmi leftist trash who hate their own history and culture.

    “Amor Patriae Nostra Lex”

  6. Daft people should just remove his chair. Make the prisoner stand in the dock, as we did back when child rape and murder were a hanging offence.

  7. We had a radio jock Alan Jones who used to talk about this stuff on radio, after a 3 year legal battle against the anti-discrimination commissar in NSW he was fined and had to apologise to lebanese muslims for calling them scumbags.
    Point is our opportunity to talk publicly on these cases is slowly being closed down by the muslim/communist alliance. They are slowly but surely restricting our free speech arteries.
    We should be out on the streets demanding the scumbag get charged with contempt of court, but were not because we (public) dont know how important it is to win each and every battle that comes before us.
    The scumbag is part of violent determined international supremist organisation who have been usurping and invading for 1400 years, the judge on the other thinks she is dealing with an uppity criminal, she also thinks shes clever and shes not, because shes got her discrimination blinkers on.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*