Once again a moronic lefty judge submits to the preposterous notion that the irrational and superstitious beliefs of immigrants should trump the law of Australia as determined through centuries of rational and democratic jurisprudence. The fact that she challenged him on his stance looks like a victory but it is actually a loss. It is nearly an enemy gambit actually. Because it leads the way to muslims being able to show contempt for our laws legally if they can cite scripture to show where it is required of them.
Her argument is a defacto admission that islam and sharia trumps secular law. Just as in the payout in the previous post on Sweden.
Accused rioter Mohammed Issai Issaka berated in court after refusing to stand for Magistrate Jacqueline Milledge
A MAN accused of rioting during last year’s violent Muslim protests has been berated for his “disrespect” after refusing to stand before a magistrate at his court hearing.
Mohammed Issai Issaka, who was charged with riot, assaulting police and resisting arrest over the September incident, this morning said his religious beliefs stopped him for rising for the court – the standard practice whenever a judge or magistrate enters or leaves.
Magistrate Jacqueline Milledge repeatedly demanded Issaka stand for her, telling him she didn’t accept his refusal.