One of the most distorted words Muslims use as part of their arsenal against the rest of the world is the notion of defense. Of course in Islamish, (we need an actual word for the language of Islam as opposed to Arabic which can be used to actually mean what one says if they are not religious Muslims) defense means that if they encounter any resistance when enforcing sharia law against the unwilling infidel, then they take for themselves the right to redouble their efforts in forcing Islamic laws and conditions on an area as they are ‘defending their religion‘ even though the rational person would see it as encountering resistance to an offensive. I plan to do a video on that soon.
For the moment however, let’s look at this tortured logic from a Swedish MP and printed in a Pakistani newspaper. One can begin to see why the left and Islam can be bedfellows. They both indulge in projecting blame onto the victims when it suits their various (nefarious?) purposes.
The left like to blame successful people for the assumed horror of the lives of the less hard working or less successful. Muslims like to blame women who have been raped for whatever happens to them if it is by muslim males. (Yes often more than one. Shall we ask Laura Logan?) And here of course, most expedient of all, when Muslims commit acts of horror, murder, vandalism, arson, mass destruction it is the fault of whoever said or did something for which a case can be made, insulted Islam. Whether what was said or done, was factually correct or not.
There can be no mistake that Islamic demands to submit to sharia compliance is a threat of violence and that any violence they do uses the logic of the classic neighborhood thug. The idea that you have called for the violence done to you because you would not submit to the bully’s demands.
But perhaps what is most distressing of all, is the relatively new idea the leftists have inculcated our entire Western culture with. And that is the notion that peace is far more important than anything. Than our culture, our history, and certainly and obviously our freedoms as the leftists have been working three shifts to erase those at every level.
Eeyore for Vlad.
From The News.Pakistan
Sunday, October 14, 2012
From Print Edition
LAHORE
NASIM Malik, a Swedish social democrat politician, has asked those who genuinely stand for the world peace to unite against those who produce sacrilegious, baneful material and who, in the name of freedom of expression, are bent upon destroying the little hope the humanity today has for peace.
While talking to The News from Sweden on Wednesday, Nasim Malik, an elected reserve member of the Swedish Parliament, expressed great concern over the ongoing highly deplorable acts of provocation against Muslims of the world. He said that the Muslim world deplored the brazen act of blatant provocation by the production of an anti-Islam film.
It is another inflammable act, fueling tension, violence and bloodshed. At a time when every effort is needed to pacify emotions and create an atmosphere of harmony amongst faiths and communities, this film has hurt the sentiments of Muslims all over the world, flaring up large-scale demonstrations and protests.
Nasim Malik said that some months ago one of the great Muslim leaders and scholars delivered several addresses, including one at Capitol Hill in the United States, admonishing the world to avert the serious threats to world peace and save humanity from an unprecedented destruction.
In such provocative situations, he asked the Muslims to remain calm and never retaliate violence with violence.
Malik pointed out that Islam is peace and its reaction to such devastating behaviour should express tolerance. The acts of burning flags, petrol pumps, properties and cars to show their anger are not according to the teachings of Islam.
By doing so they send a wrong message to the world community, he said. He said that the production of such films and caricatures was obviously not the work of one individual. It is a painful realisation that very countries which purport to bear the flag of peace are themselves the destroyers of peace. This is a flagrant desecration of all the International Charters which promote religious tolerance and respect for all faiths and founders of faith.
The governments of the countries where such material is produced must act sternly and seize and destroy such material forthwith and those who sanctioned its production must be duly dealt with.
Malik says that he as a Swedish social democrat politician and elected reserve member of the Swedish Parliament appeals to those who genuinely stand for the world peace to unite against those who produce such sacrilegious and baneful material.
That is only ONE film .. what about all the flags those camel fuckers burn … that means something to us BUT we don’t have a neanderthal mentality of the brained washed muslims. Fuck Allah and Mohammad; the is satanic.
Tortured logic can only be broken by pointing out the hard facts of eternal damnation in the Afterlife.
The only thing that was unacceptable, uncivilized, offensive, repulsive and so on an on… was the sight of grown Muslim men behaving worse than something not long down off the trees. Was there not even one man – Mr Malik included- or one woman from their endless list of scholars and experts who could provide a reasoned -counter argument/s as to why they considered this movie so offensive and should be removed in breach of the producer’s rights under the 1st Amendment? Do they not understand the seriousness of such an absurd demand or is this what Islam does to the human mind? Render it so sterile and so dumb that violence is all they have instead of reason. By their reactions you shall know them! As for the lefties it is business as usual. However, there are limits- they cannot be allowed to trade on hard earned liberties for the benefit of the few and to detriment of the many! Democratic principles/values are not their private property to squander as they will!
“We love peace, but not peace at any price. There is a peace more destructive of the manhood of living man, than war is destructive of his body. Chains are worse than bayonets.” — Douglas Jerrold
(What do you suppose Mr. Jerrold would have thought of Islam?)
The left uses Islam and Islam uses the left, each thinks the other side is a useful idiot, the left has more people in place in the west but they don’t have as many trained fighters.
I wonder how long before the fall into bickering and then violence?
Excellent comment Richard; as the saying goes, “when an irresistible force meets an immovable
object” ………
And we are stuck in between them.
Use the arguments of the one against the other.