Daily Mail:
- Professional panel accepted Khalil Jamil’s conduct was not sexually-motivated
- He claimed his strict Muslim background meant he lacked basic understanding of appropriate workplace behaviour
- Jamil was cleared of professional misconduct and was instead given an official warning
PUBLISHED: 06:07 EST, 31 August 2012 | UPDATED: 10:45 EST, 31 August 2012
Warning: Khalil Jamil blamed his behaviour on his restrictive background
A pharmacist who made crude remarks to three of his female colleagues has escaped with a warning after a panel heard he came from a ‘restrictive Muslim background’ and was unaware of the offence his conduct had caused.
Khalil Jamil asked one of the women about her favourite love-making position and quizzed another about the mating habits of her horses – but a professional panel ruled his behaviour was not sexually motivated.
The General Pharmaceutical Council panel found Jamil acted inappropriately by making the comments and standing too close to his assistants.
However, they accepted that his background in a strict Muslim community meant he was unfamiliar to working in such an open environment with women and his basic social skills meant he lacked understanding of appropriate conduct.
As the remarks were not sexually motivated the panel cleared Jamil of misconduct and gave him an official warning.
It also took into consideration the fact that Jamil had remedied his actions by attending a ‘dignity at work’ course.
Panel chairman Patrick Malmo QC said: ‘He felt the source of this behaviour in 2009, was that he comes from a very restrictive background, with little social life, and none at all outside of his own community.
‘He lacked social skills, and had little knowledge of how one should be when working with colleagues.
‘He was unable to distinguish between friendliness and over familiarity.’
Mr Malmo added: ‘We do not think there is a serious risk of this kind of conduct being repeated.
‘Although we do not find the registrant impaired, we have the ability to issue a warning, and given the circumstances of this case, we believe it is necessary to do so.’
Ah well, you see, he has a beard, pajamas and little white hat, but he is not a dirty unwashed Muslim sex-pest because there are no sandals. He actually has shoes on which means that he is 10% civilized!
Thank God for that. We can all sleep at night.
You must all realize, that his strict Muslim background means that he does not know how to behave appropriately in the work environment, but at least he’s wearing shoes, so he’s getting there. With a little encouragement, he might even remember to take his pajamas off in a morning and put on a shirt and some trousers, instead of dressing like a filthy, lazy, smelly, primitive degenerate.
There’s hope for everyone (maybe)!
They (the people in power) know that he’s guilty, he knows he’s guilty and his victim knows he’s guilty but they bow to this muslim pervert and allow him to go free. Who’s the bigger criminal and who needs the sanction? The more this two tier justice is allowed the worse it will get. Your choice, put your tail between your legs or man up and fight back.
When is we say “your tits are nice” “nice body” “great legs” we are put up on sexually harrasment charges?
He asks personal questions and gets away with it. its a shame the female(s) didnt turn around and break his skinny little jaw, but then again he would scream the victim card.
I wonder if he had to go out the back to bat one off when he asked about the horses.
The two tiered judicial system is alive and well in Britain, it is a shame to see Britain sinking to this uncivilized level.
No two tiered judicial system ay, what a load of bullshit. This panel reflects years of marxist brainwashing.
the only brainwashed people are muzzies, brainwashed since the 1400’s and still going strong
We live in a country where women are over-sexualised and sold as ‘products’
for capitalist gains. A woman’s beauty is splashed around everywhere, and
she is only judged by that. Islam tells a woman to cover up so that she is
not abused as Western women are.
IA
http://www.londonschopolofislamics.org.uk
If islamic women wish to cover up excessively or abuse themsleves with their head covering or face veil, in the heat, it is up to them, though many of those moslems women are hypocrites and do not cover up. Iftikhar should point out all the hypocrisy that is hapenning in their islamic community. But please do not force it in on us decent infidels and make us decent infidels uncomfortable due to the irrational impositon of islam. Often times it is the behaviour of the wealthy islamic community is to be blamed for the restrictive and backward islamic predominant environment. After gaining all the wealth from the west, those islamic people began to arrogantly and inappropriately judged western women based on their backward islamic standards. If moslems don’t like to see us infidels, they should just only look at their rude islamic women . Moslems people should not make us infidels uncomfortable based by their inferior standards of morality. It is called freedom of choice, to wear according to the weather, occassion or personal choice. OUr infidels choice of clothing should not be dictated by the islamic community(where hypocrisy and double standards are rampant in asian region). Islamic community have no right to make us infidels feel uncomfortable. Moslem people have no right to control us INFIDEL women. Anyway, one should not be judged by what one wear. It is mostly asian and islamic people that need to behave more decently.
@IA…..You muslims , who are known to abuse, beat, rape, disfigure & oppress females on a daily basis have a hell of a lot of nerve thinking you can tell other people how to treat women. The term hypocrite & much worse comes to mind. Now piss off.
Why is it iffy you can only post and not debate? is it because you cut and paste from a set script and dont have the answers at hand.
If you mudslimes dont like the west, piss off! simple as that dont tell us all about shitlam we dont give a fuck!
If you wanna gauge how people feel about shitlam have a look on facebook there are thousands of pages against this cult and its barbaric members.
We infidels and western modest women listen to our own minds. Most of us infidels subscribe to a more modest dressing and modest behaviour. Modest dressing does not belong too islam only. Islam ic people are trying to erroneously claim or boast that modest women exist only in islam when there are in fact more of us infidels and western women who are far more genuinely modest women and more well behaved without the control of islam.
Heeeeeeeereessssss iffy with more bullshit on shitlam
Iffy is a typical “dawah” crackpot. Posts the same bullshit again and again …
Islamozombie spammer.
What if one of the women asked him about the evil demon he worshipped?
How many animals had he sacrificed to it?
How many women he’d raped for Allah?
How does it feel to practice superstitious magic instead of genuine religion?
You need to figure a way to legally deal with your judiciary.
Though eib makes an excellent point.
too bad he wasn’t working with me, because I would have taken himin the washroom, shoved a long dildo up his ass and asked him which direction he liked it best from,
then pleaded innocence on the basis of not taking my meds that day, or having too much to drink, or not being aware, that islmics who wear dresses to work, don’t like anal stimulation