Gov’t urged to pronounce husband, wife, wife, wife

Some interesting thoughts in this article from Canada’s David Harris and others…

From WND.COM

Posted: November 27, 2010
10:45 pm Eastern

By Ellis Washington
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

SAN FRANCISCO - AUGUST 12: Opponents of same-sex hold signs outside of San Francisco city hall after a decision to lift a stay on same-sex marriages was announced August 12, 2010 in San Francisco, California. California Supreme court Judge Vaughn Walker lifted a stay on same-sex marriages in California just over one week after his ruling that Prop 8 was unconstitutional. Marriages will be allowed to resume on August 18. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Canada has recognized same-sex “marriages” since 2005, and now apparently is preparing to take the next step in the “progressive” movement, with arguments scheduled in coming days before the equivalent of a state Supreme Court on a plan to repeal laws against polygamy and bigamy.

The CBC has told the story of Zoe Duff, a director of the Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association, who has two male common-law partners and believes Canada’s polygamy laws need to be stricken because they don’t permit her to live her chosen lifestyle.

The situation involving the Vancouver Island woman is expected to be the subject of hearings planned before the British Columbia Supreme Court over the coming weeks.

Understand the dark side of what’s really happening in America. Read “HOW EVIL WORKS”– autographed!

If the advocates for multiple partners are successful in the provincial court, their next hurdle would be the Canadian Charter, where Section 293 of the Criminal Code at this point still bans polygamy and threatens offenders with a five-year prison term. Section 290 makes a similarly serious crime of bigamy.

Observers note that American values appear to be following Canada’s down the slippery slope of lifestyle choices.

For the rest of this article, please click over to WND.COM

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

5 Replies to “Gov’t urged to pronounce husband, wife, wife, wife”

  1. It seems to me that some countries are getting to the stage of letting people do whatever their wont and to hell with the consequences,

  2. Polygamy is bad for girls and it is bad for boys. Polygamy was outlawed by our ancestors thousands of years ago because it is an evil, primitive, backward, wrong practice, suitable for horses and lions, but not for humans. Polygamy benefits only the fifty-year-old guy at the top of the pyramid, as it benefited Mohammed and Warren Jeffs in the past. This is really scary that people are even talking about legalizing this evil, it should be a complete no-brainer. What comes next, legalizing cannibalism? Hey, why not have sex with your mother and then murder your best friend? It’s all relative, isn’t it? I mean, like, everything is everything and nothing matters…right?

  3. Polygamy is fine, between consulting adults. It’s totally up to them, and has nothing to do with the state at all, which should stop sticking its nose into other people’s business. It’s about time it got out of the marriage/relationship game all together.
    Nothing to do with the state at all.

  4. blinguard,

    this issue is about grooming little girls to hop on a 50 year old fart’s tiny wiener…

    what you ‘anything goes’ adults do for fun does not concern anybody..

  5. Van Grungy has got a lot of truth in his statement, mainly polygamy is about a small group of men wanting to have more then one woman to have sex with yet still be able to say they are married. It is like the various cult leaders who insist on sleeping with any and all of the female cult members. This isn’t about freedom of any form, it is about a small group of men wanting to have multiple sex partners. The men never matured beyond their teen dreams.