HONOR KILLING DESCRIBED IN FINNISH COURT AS BRUTAL RITUAL MURDER DURING SENTENCING

Posted on by
Last year, when the story broke about the murder of an ethnic Pakistani woman who divorced her husband, (also from Pakistan), the Tundra Tabloids reported that the Finnish police and prosecutor were treating the crime as just a homicide, void of any outside Islamic  influence. Well it’s now obvious that the prosecution has changed its mind. The murder by the 35 year old Pakistani defendant was described as “a very premeditated, raw, ritual slaughter”  with the perp getting a life sentence, by the Lappeenranta court. A life sentence in Finland means a minimum of 11-12 years in jail. KGS

NOTE: This report in Finnish, states that he got life, or at least 11 yrs.

A former spouse accused of killing an ethnic Pakistani woman (sitting in the middle behind the paper) will receive the verdict today. On the left is his translator, Riti Sandu, on the right  his lawyer Heikki Lampela.

The handling of the case that happened less than a year ago in Lappeenranta, will come to an end today in  the South Karelia, district court.

The last time the issue was discussed in the District Court was in April of last year. The convicted man was sent by a state at the time, to a mental facility for study.

It is a story in which the victim, a 34-year old Pakistani woman was living in Finland. The killer was the woman’s ex-spouse, who also was born in Pakistan. They had been married during the  years 2005-2007.

In District Prosecutor Mark O. Ahonen’s view, it was very premeditated act of murder, a raw ritual slaughter.

According to Defense lawyer, Heikki Lampela, it was just an act of murder.

After the murder, the killer tried to escape from Finland, but the police arrested him at the Helsinki-Vantaa airport.

H/T Kumitonttu 

3 Replies to “HONOR KILLING DESCRIBED IN FINNISH COURT AS BRUTAL RITUAL MURDER DURING SENTENCING”

  1. Too bad they don’t have the death penalty, this man (for lack of a better word that isn’t a cuss word) deserves to be put to death so his breathing doesn’t pollute our air.

  2. The west needs to reinstate the death penalty for crimes like this.

    The convict will only get the chance to spread his brand of hatred in prison by practising dawa.

    Without the threat of death hanging over them, Muslims can get away with whatever they want. Witness the rising crime rate among Muslims around the world.

    There is only one real way to stop it from spreading. And we know its not by molly-coddling them…

  3. Properly applied the death penalty does deter crime, back in 1920 the Brits passed their first gun control law, the stated purpose was to stop the use of guns to commit crimes, over the next year gun crimes increased. In 1921 the Brits passed the law that said if you used a gun in a crime they would hang you, in a year almost all gun crime stopped, then in the 1960s Britain did away with the death penalty, no London has more violent crime and gun crimes then any US city of equal size, and there are more gun crimes per hundred thousand in Britain then in the US. Harsh gun control laws and no death penalty create crime and violence.