About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

3 Replies to ““it is in The West” -Ibn Warraq”

  1. So can someone tell me why are our genius leaders have allowed Muslims to be here?Do we not have enough problems already re: financial, environmental, aging?

    Why do our leaders till refuse to discuss this and agree that Islam is an otherabrahamic religion?

    Their pension, their power and the perks.

    Reagan was right – the problem is government. Especially in Canada. We are already paying 42 -44% of income to taxes. How much of that is going to finance Islam or the result of new security costs or welfare costs due to Islam?

    Enough is enough – we must begin a party that has on its platform, the goal to deport any muslim, whether born here or parents born here to be deported.

    The media, CTVCBC will verbally crucify us but I am prepared even though your typical Canadian, especially our brain ded females, do not deserve this protection.

  2. I found out about that debate yesterday via Cherles Chronicles on Pajamas Media… After that, having felt my stomach turn after hearing William Dalrymple spew his ignorant nonsense in the intro to the debate, I decided to look him up at Jihadwatch and found this. Hugh Fitzgerald’s destruction of Dalrymple in that article is priceless.

    In addition to it, Fitzgerald described Tariq Ramadan’s performance exactly as I perceived it. His ramblings, without a whole lot of connections and clarity between everything he tried to say, made it hard to really listen… After a while, his accent too started to get in the way.

  3. At the end of the debate, the pro-civilization/anti-inbred-bedouin-savagery side missed an opportunity to make an excellent point with which to show how immoral the other side was. After one of his points had been joked about by David Aaronovitch if I’m not wrong, Charles Glass said that those weren’t his words, but Sir Winston Churchill’s. At that point, the debate moderator said “you can’t go wrong by quoting Sir Winston Churchill, can you?”

    Just imagine, had there been an opportunity for that, what the pro-civilization side could have left the audience to think about if they had managed to quote Churchill’s brilliant and flawless observations on mahoundianism:

    How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *